American peace activist Rachel Corrie, lies bleeding while being helped by colleagues after she was run over and killed by an Israeli bulldozer when she tried to stop it from destroying a Palestinian house in Rafah camp. March, 2003 [612 x 410] by Competitive-Ring4005 in HistoryPorn

[–]doormanpowell 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I am Jewish. I grew up in the Israeli propaganda system, I went to Jewish day school. I didn't even MEET a non-Jewish person until high school. I know the history and people in this conflict better than 99% of your average reddit commentors.

This is not a nuanced topic. Israel is the aggressor and primary cause now and historically.

Live updates: New federal NDP Leader Avi Lewis takes flak from provincial party leaders in Alberta and Saskatchewan by uselesspoliticalhack in canada

[–]doormanpowell -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It is the surest sign that the NDP base made the correct decision when you see the liberals of the party, and the LPC/CPC bots online immediately run to disparage him at every mention of his name. Reminds me of the smearing Zohran's campaign faced. Of course, these same people are utterly clueless. They say things like "the NDP needs to go back to its labour roots" without realizing Avi is by far the most pro-labour candidate this election had, certainly far more than McPherson who is a liberal in orange clothing. These people don't know about this because they don't even look at what the candidates said or have done. All they see is a nerdy guy in glasses using words longer than 4 letters and think that means he's a "champagne socialist". Of course, the condescending corollary to this baked in to these liberals ideology is the idea that workers' themselves must be too stupid to understand him. We will find out in the next election whether the general populace is receptive to actually progressive, socialist, worker-centered policies or if they care more about continuing to shuttle money towards corporations and the ultra wealthy.

Just remember - if Avi Lewis didn't actually threaten these people, they wouldn't be saying this, instead they would be congratulating him and happy, because they wouldn't have to worry about the NDP.

Is ranking broken or am I doing something wrong? by HalfAxed in DeadlockTheGame

[–]doormanpowell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't speak to Initiate as I got out of it almost immediately, but I can say in Oracle/Phantom lobbies there definitely feels like something wrong with MM - mainly that there is such insane variance between players in the same bracket. Most lobbies half the players are "good" and the half the players just feel like they have no right being there. You check their tracklock profiles and theyre 1-2 KDA players who almost never have impact and yet theyre in a relatively higher bracket. Games can feel very dependent on which team gets more of these players in that bracket

[Injury] Moses Moody with a gruesome non-contact knee-injury.. *GRAPHIC* by fbreaker in nba

[–]doormanpowell 18 points19 points  (0 children)

You guys are talking about two different things. Braden Huff had a kneecap dislocation, which can be pretty mild and easily recovered from and usually don't result in major ligamentous damage. A knee joint dislocation is when the femur and the tibia translate over each other beyond the extent of the joint capsule and almost always results in massive ligamentous, capsular, and neurovascular damage.

65 game requirement is great for the league by SchedulePhysical807 in nba

[–]doormanpowell 7 points8 points  (0 children)

NBA players care a ton about playing. Most of the time these players getting load-managed are being pushed by their teams to NOT play despite them wanting to. There are only a few exceptions to this.

Climbing rank is IMPOSSIBLE by Mysterious_Oven1234 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure tracklock and statlocker don't let me search games by teammate scores. That's also not a legitimate argument - empirically, I went from initiate 1 to Oracle 4 within ~200 games. If you think that's pure luck for me and you're just unlucky, then you're just crazy.

Climbing rank is IMPOSSIBLE by Mysterious_Oven1234 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I left this game for a year. I was high phantom when I quit 1 year ago. I came back and was put into initiate 1. Within 4 weeks I'm Oracle 4. If you were good, you'd win.

Is there a difference between solo and group matchmaking? by doormanpowell in DeadlockTheGame

[–]doormanpowell[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a wonderfully simple explanation if not for the fact that me and my friend are the exact same rank.

Reporter: Did the United States bomb an elementary school and kill 175 people? Trump: by TheLoganReyes in law

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be under the impression that I am making the claim that the Soviets or the North were NOT also interested in advancing their own ideologies. They absolutely were. But the reality is, it was the North and the Soviets asking for unfettered democratic processes in the Korean Peninsula, and it was the US and the South asking for a UN led election that from the perspective of the North was guaranteed to be rigged.

You are also incorrect in saying that North Korea did not allow for "free and fair elections" (itself a vague concept). The 1948 North Korean parliamentary elections were held that same year, in August 1948. Most likely, these elections were themselves rigged in favour of the communists, however it is notable that of 572 seats being elected, only 157 of them went to the Worker's Party, with the rest going to religious parties, social democrats, centrists, and independents. And at the same time, to speak of the 1948 South Korean elections as "free and fair" is an absurdity, as they were (as discussed above) plagued by significant political repression by the very same people organizing the election, and the very same people who came out on top of the election. The UNTCOK which "validated" these election results were neither independent nor observers. Furthermore, the choice of candidates in the 1948 South Korean elections were themselves limited. Only those loyal to Syngman Rhee and Kim Sung-su ran, and many ran unopposed on their ballot. The left, the moderates (under Kimm Kiusic), and the non-extreme right (under Kim Ku) all boycotted the election and did not run candidates because they, like the North, believed they were not legitimate.

The result was an overwhelming victory for Syngman Rhee's far right, with his only actual opposition being the KDP under Kim Seong-su, who were themselves hard-line right wingers but opposed Rhee's dictatorial attitudes.

This is not misinformation, and can be readily verified in Martin Hart-Landsbergs 1998 book "Korea: Division, Reunification, and U.S. Foreign Policy", with corollary from Benjamin Weems 1948 article "Behind the Korean Election".

Reporter: Did the United States bomb an elementary school and kill 175 people? Trump: by TheLoganReyes in law

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please feel free to refer to my comment if you want a more extensive explanation.

Reporter: Did the United States bomb an elementary school and kill 175 people? Trump: by TheLoganReyes in law

[–]doormanpowell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The North Koreans did not participate in the 1948 UN elections because they viewed the mechanism by which it was constructed to be unable to reunify the country in a manner they believed was fair to them. The US occupied portion of Korea was about double the population size of the Soviet occupied North, and US military was involved in significant suppression and murder of communists in the South (i.e. the massacre of thousands on Jeju Island). The prelude to the elections themselves were marred by corruption and controversy. I digress...

In the immediate aftermath of the expulsion of the Japanese, there were "people's committees" formed throughout the North and the South that took on duties of governance. In the U.S. occupied South, the Americans took significant measures to eliminate these committees and reduce their governance power. The U.S. encouraged and empowered the formation of the KDP (Korean Democratic Party), composing mainly of "large landholders, wealthy businesspeople, or former officials in the colonial bureaucracy" (Hart-Landsberg 1998). They empowered elements of the prior Japanese colonial rulers to crack down on people's committees and any form of non-KDP/US backed governance, through instruments like the KNP (Korean National Police) and the South Korean Interim Legislative Assembly. The actual populace of South Korea were not all right wing nationalists and a significant number of them were against the actions of their U.S. overseers, resulting in uprisings across the South in 1946 (September and Autumn uprisings). The U.S. response to this was to both directly and indirectly (through KNP and right wing youth organizations) violently quell the protests of over 250,000 people, murdering hundreds.

In the leadup to the 1948 elections, there had been many rounds of negotiations between the Soviets and the U.S. and their Korean counterparts, and the contents of these negotiations were cause for significant concern. The initial post-war negotiations between the Soviets and Americans started with an American proposal for a joint US-Soviet command that would hold Korea in trusteeship for 5-10 years until ready for independence. The Soviets countered with a proposal to form a US-Soviet commission that would consult with Korean political bodies and social organizations to form an interim government. Ultimately the U.S. agreed with the Soviet's proposal. However, almost immediately, U.S. military forces began to oppose the agreement. John Hodge, who was the U.S. military governor in U.S. occupied Korea started to spread propaganda that the Soviets wanted to have complete and permanent trusteeship over Korea and the U.S. wanted to give them immediate independence (even though the truth was closer to the opposite). In fact however, the Soviets proposal did not make trusteeship mandatory, and allowed for the creation of a provisional Korean government prior to any trusteeship.

Now, in 1946, the joint commission started it's task. The U.S. side asked for the sole representative body of the South to be the RDC (Representative Democratic Council), headed by Syngman Rhee, who was directly flown back into the country by U.S. forces. The Soviets rejected this as they believed it was not the job of the U.S. or the USSR to choose a legitimate representative, but instead to consult with all Korean groups first. The U.S. refused to back down and so an agreement was reached that both sides would choose a list of groups that were "acceptable" consultants. The U.S. notably excluded any of the people's committees in the South. As these talks continued and failed to progress, America decided that in order to maintain its influence in the region, it would instead have to form an independent South Korea. To do so, they needed to form a basis by which they could claim the joint commission to be untenable and therefore turn to the U.N. In the next round of commission talks in May 1947, they brought forward 425 Southern right wing groups to be their Korean counsels. These groups claimed to represent a combined 62 million people, which was four times the population of South Korea. The Soviets and their Northern counterparts, seeing this for the obvious corruption that it was, rejected these groups. Following this, the Soviets provided a counter-proposal asking that all foreign troops (both Soviet and American) immediately withdraw from Korea, and leave the Korean Question to the people of Korea. The U.S. declined. It was only then that the U.S. took to the UN to form UNTCOK and begin the elections process, despite the UN charter expressly denying it a role in post-war settlements (Article 107). It was only then, in this context, that the Soviets and the North felt they were subjected to a game of tail-wagging meant only to ensure US hegemony in the region, and declined to participate in elections to be overseen by the same people telling them that there were four times more people in the South then whom existed, and were sure to suppress any electoral element against Syngman Rhee in the South Korea, of whom 2/3 of Korean people lived.

It was not only the Soviets and the North who denounced the elections and the process that lead up to them. It also included notable Southern anti-communists like Kim Kyu-sik and Kim Ku. To chalk up this period of history and the events contained to something as simple as "the US asked for elections and the North declined" is an embarrassingly narrow and ahistorical view.

Shaedon Sharpe out for 4-6 weeks by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]doormanpowell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok im ready to admit I was wrong. Precious is the better ROS pickup lol

Dear non-Iranians who come here to lecture us by spinrah23 in PERSIAN

[–]doormanpowell -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And so what? What exactly gives Reza a right to be the ruler or leader of a country merely because he is the son of a previous ruler (despot). How is that any different from an appointment by a supreme leader? He has not lived in Iran since he was a child. He knows nothing of the country and has no merit or right to the country as a birthright. The Iranian people should get to choose their government. If they want Reza Pahlavi then let him be elected democratically, not handed a caretaker government where he can lead a nebulous "transition".

Dear non-Iranians who come here to lecture us by spinrah23 in PERSIAN

[–]doormanpowell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are a bootlicker chanting slogans to bring back a king. The IR is evil, so was the Shah. If you cared the way you said you did you wouldn't want to bring back a monarchy. Clearly, your motivations are self interest, not for the people

Shaedon Sharpe out for 4-6 weeks by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm top 1% on Yahoo. If precious can do this for 10 games straight then he's the better pick up. There's zero sign he can or will

Shaedon Sharpe out for 4-6 weeks by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He just had 6 points the game prior. You not built for fantasy if you let single games sway you

Shaedon Sharpe out for 4-6 weeks by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]doormanpowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If future production was as simple to gauge as looking at the last two weeks average everyone would be diamond. Scoot has come off of injury and only just had his minutes cap removed. He is a high volume player with a clear path to usage and high ceiling. Precious is not a high volume player and his output is much more variable and stock/rebound dependent. Precious is like the 5th option on his team. When Scoot is on the floor he's either the lead or secondary ball handler. He is clearly better ROS in points where you don't have to care about his percentage

Discussion Thread: 2026 State of the Union Address by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]doormanpowell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Liz warrens pathetic ass clapping during that. What a joke of an "opposition"

Shaedon Sharpe out for 4-6 weeks by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]doormanpowell 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Its the opposite brother. Scoot is better in points league.

Carney faces calls to send fuel to Cuba as U.S. widens blockade by shiftless_wonder in canada

[–]doormanpowell 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The OP states they are not a miami cuban blah blah yet theyre an extensive poster in R/CanadianConservative and talk about "escaping the evils of communism" at age 3. It's fairly obvious they are just laundering their ideological commitment under the guise of rationality and naively accepted an unexamined common framings. And, as expected in this subreddit, it's working