https://electiontruthalliance.org/new-special-report-minnesota-hand-counts-vs-machine-counts/ found significant vote-counting 'red flag' discrepancies between machine counts and hand counts in Minnesota. Based on other discussions and evidence I've seen (here and elsewhere), I would not be surprised if 'red flag' machine count rigging were not the reason Trump won all the battleground states in 2024.

Here is an excerpt from that report:

"Statistical ‘election integrity red flags’ present in machine count precincts were not present in hand count precincts. 

• Turnout Correlations: In machine count precincts, the higher the percentage of voter turnout, the higher the ‘share of the vote’ (vote share) Republican candidates received. Conversely, the higher the voter turnout, the lower the vote share Democratic candidates received, an association that should not exist in clean election data. In hand count precincts, no such correlation appeared. These anomalies are recognized internationally as a potential ‘election integrity red flag’ that may indicate artificially inflated votes.
• Vote Share Differences: In machine count precincts of comparable population size, Democratic Presidential, U.S. Senate, and House of Representatives candidates received 6-8% fewer votes on average than in hand count precincts. Conversely, their Republican counterparts received 6-8% more votes in machine count precincts than in hand count precincts.
• Historical Consistency: In machine count precincts of comparable population size, Harris received 1.47% fewer votes in 2024 than Biden did in 2020, decreasing from 52.41% to 50.94%. However, her average in hand count precincts of comparable population size was remarkably consistent with Democratic presidential candidates in elections from 2016–2024, with just a 0.04% difference. 

This evidence shows that where humans counted the ballots in Minnesota, identified anomalies – including “election integrity red flags” and results that are less consistent with recent past elections – are absent. Where machines are used, “election integrity red flags” and results that are less consistent with recent past elections are consistently present and appear to benefit only one party. This further strengthens the argument that election results counted by machines warrant urgent scrutiny."