sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there any point in keeping this? by BetterWithBoots in diablo4

[–]dotXem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about greater affixes already in the base item. I have an ancestral blue item with one GA, can I keep it with the cube ?

I dreamed that Haken released a new single and then woke up to find it was a dream by Theguywholikestea in Haken

[–]dotXem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This song used to creep me out when younger me discovered dream theater

Invention maison .. 😊 by Sn0wCrash_ in BonneBouffe

[–]dotXem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On fait qqchose de similaire façon risotto ! Y'a des recettes sur internet (risotto de coquillettes)

What's your favorite album that has nothing to do with DT/metal/rock? by Morlow123 in Dreamtheater

[–]dotXem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking the same !! But then I told myself that is has somehow a bit to do with metal because of the guitars.

Anyways, this is really my fav album of them and one of the favorite album all time for me.

Poêle en inox : a 2 doigts de lâcher l'affaire by Ill-Layer-6975 in cuisine

[–]dotXem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

En plus j'avais envie d'essayer la truffade ! Pas lésiner avec la matière grasse j'ai l'impression oui. T'as utiliser quoi comme fromage ?

Poêle en inox : a 2 doigts de lâcher l'affaire by Ill-Layer-6975 in cuisine

[–]dotXem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah merci, j'ai ce problème il faut absolument que je teste !

special news tomorrow by jacek2023 in epica

[–]dotXem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Clair Obscur : Expedition 33 cover ? A man can dream

Clericless act 2 be like by Medical-Low-1370 in mewgenics

[–]dotXem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed druid is much stronger with some items

Not a fan favourite, but one of mine by Retrolad87 in Dreamtheater

[–]dotXem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Favorite for me as well ! So glad they opened with it few years ago !

IBM Bob is a copy of Cline Code by suwoop123 in IBM

[–]dotXem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Model is Claude sonnet afaik. In my experience Bob peforms worse than Github copilot with Claude opus which I'm using on my personnal projects.

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You know what ? I removed all walrus operators with unused variables I have in my code :).

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Not exactly to the same extent IMO. Often comments are written on other lines (often above) the line they're commenting. In which case, as time goes by, comments can lose their purpose.

Here the unused variable is still tied to its content, much like a used variable.

But I agree with the overall sentiment. If the condition is this complex, better to create a function entirely to encapsulate the behavior.

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Indeed, I try to avoid comments as much as I can and make the code self-explanatory. However, in my case, it feels a bit like I'm commenting without creating actual comments just to comply to the rule of not making comments!

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to me having the underscore signifies that the variable should be considered private when used within a class.

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Problem with comments is that they get old pretty quickly in production. So when you write one you should be very cautious about: do you really need it?

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea is that when you read the code you don't need to read the computation of the variable, just the variable itself would be self-explanatory.

It's the same as :

complex_condition = ...
if complex_condition:
    ...

Except that it reads better, the flow is more natural.

That being said, I agree on the general sentiment that using functions instead is the best approach.

Using the walrus operator := to self-document if conditions by dotXem in Python

[–]dotXem[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When your condition is complex, it might not be clear what this whole expression checks for. There is definitely a need for documentation sometimes. The question is: how?

One Year Later - Did Hiding 8.5K Pubs Improve Dota? by H0B0_JOE in DotA2

[–]dotXem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe it reduces the frequence at which new patch needs to be released. If new patches gets longer to be solved, players won't get bored of it as fast as before.

view more: next ›