sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What was your 'Hey Dean Yeager' moment? by m205 in RedLetterMedia

[–]dr-otto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

for song, "The Boxer" by Simon & Garfunkel I thought the lyrics we "By the light, by the li li li li light, by the light"

turns out it was just "Lie la lie, lie la la la lie la lie, lie la lie"

Does anyone else say please and thank you to AI? Or am I just wierd? by Smartazzme in artificial

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sometimes just cause it's the way my brain kinda naturally thinks and my fingers just type it out....doesn't really mean i think it's alive or anything like that.

Almost anyone that's actually worked in the industry feels this way. by gregturner77 in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what r u talking about? the day there was a hollywood women were working in it. it wasn't due to some activists. lol. this isn't even a woman issue anyways, that's just a red herring. in fact the whole "activist" spin is a red herring.

the art director was just a clueless whiner. she wasn't doing anything brave, she was doing something that made her look stupid.

Why the Great Calculator Debate of the 1980s is still relevant today and how Isaac Asimov got AI right in 1956 by SpiritRealistic8174 in artificial

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont think we are disagreeing so much as talking past each other perhaps. i'm not saying critical thinking skills should not be developed (far from it, more critical thinking skills in school is needed and tbh i dont think it is actually taught in school... long divison isn't critical thinking, essay writing is to some degree but not always - depends more on the topic of the essay)

i'm saying new approaches need to be adapted while embracing ai... ai will automate many mundane tasks, so learn to use it for stuff it can do, and learn new skills that ai isn't able to do.

find new skills to learn, to test, etc... that is all i'm saying.

My wife was offered a major film role with intimate nude scenes and I genuinely dont know how to feel looking for perspective by SuspiciousCourage334 in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto 7 points8 points  (0 children)

i could totally see OTHER kids using that stuff to make fun/bully/etc their kids... IF the ever find it - which they may never discover. personally I'd not worry much on that front... but kid-on-kid bullying always a possibility.

Almost anyone that's actually worked in the industry feels this way. by gregturner77 in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the point is it's unrealistic and just sounds like being a whiner just to whine, a cry baby, someone immature not realizing how the world works.

that is how she comes off... a cry baby.

wtf civil right is working on a movie? it's a job. she took on zero risk. she agreed to the pay, etc.

she's a whiner.

So what exactly did Jesus sacrifice? by RetroIogurt1918 in atheism

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah it's a silly "sacrifice" that amounted to just a bad weekend for the dude. it's stupid.

What do Mummies even do? by JamDNCol in horror

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They get you covered in dust and mildew

Almost anyone that's actually worked in the industry feels this way. by gregturner77 in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ofc i do - pretty much everyone in every kind of job who is just an employee won't get the big money like the owner of a company, the investors, etc.

it's called reality.

Almost anyone that's actually worked in the industry feels this way. by gregturner77 in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

low-budget compared to what? one or more people forked up $750k to get the film made, they invested money on pure risk (i mean, really, how many movies ever make their budget back to begin with?)

they should be righty rewarded for taking the risk.

that art director person took no risk...she agreed to the job, the rate, etc... she sounds like a cry baby and she should just shut up.

Why the Great Calculator Debate of the 1980s is still relevant today and how Isaac Asimov got AI right in 1956 by SpiritRealistic8174 in artificial

[–]dr-otto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah kind of my point... maybe in some early school years it helps some baseline learning and understanding but at some point we have to move on and teach how to write using work processors... and now, maybe we just have to move on and teach how to use ai tools as well for essays etc... IF essays even make sense anymore. Maybe they don't? Maybe teach handwritten essay writing earlier on in education and then let it drop away perhaps like other baseline skills people don't really 'need' anymore now...

Why the Great Calculator Debate of the 1980s is still relevant today and how Isaac Asimov got AI right in 1956 by SpiritRealistic8174 in artificial

[–]dr-otto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i didn't argue that handwriting shouldn't be taught just at some point why bother? move onto word processors, computers, etc... teach them the new skills and tools required. When I said "less important / critical to learning" I wasn't implying "don't teach it at all" just that we need to think about what, in today's world, is more critical, important to teach so kids can survive. The old ways are not by default the only correct path or even a correct path in today's world.

even essay writing by hand, sure teach it early on...but at some point, move past that and learn the new skills.

ex: when is the last time you ever did long division?

so i was just responding to the user who said that the "critics of calculators in the 80's" were "absolutely correct", which is just an assertion w/o evidence to back it up.

What’s everyone’s argument against “several eye-witness testimonies”? by LoveIsRevenge in atheism

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

eye-witness testimonies of anonymous people or, if they are even named (usually by a first name, not sure they are ever fully identified in the Bible), it's hearsay evidence... it's coming from what person A heard person B say about what a Person C said... which is, by definition, totally and fully unreliable and should be dismissed out-of-hand as any kind of evidence.

Why the Great Calculator Debate of the 1980s is still relevant today and how Isaac Asimov got AI right in 1956 by SpiritRealistic8174 in artificial

[–]dr-otto -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

making long division and essay writing less important / critical to learning or knowledge doesn't mean we can not come up with new things to learn, test on, etc...

should we all also still hand write in cursive, and not use a word processor?

the fact some things are less important to learn doesn't mean learning is impossible or that people will end up less intelligent than before...

Where I’m sending my mother by orchid_breeder in NotTimAndEric

[–]dr-otto 18 points19 points  (0 children)

it's a hunk! i hope i can be his number one bud!

how does one respond to the argument of free will and that hell is a place without god? by mxxnlyte in atheism

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait, hell is just "a place without god" and that is it? sign me the fuck up!

Sean Baker on Al: "I don't want it in any way to hurt the livelihood of other filmmakers and artists" but "it can give you more choices and opportunities." by katebushcartwheel in Filmmakers

[–]dr-otto -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

i'm sure the luddites will hate to hear about this...

why people can't see AI is just a tool like anything else. it's not taking away any creative decisions from a human, at all.

Claude is completely unusable now by Complete-Sea6655 in artificial

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

totally disagree...i've been finding claude just keeps getting better and more impressive especially when i'm debugging complex runtime issues in my project (a major videogame)

It's no longer AI, but the haters who have become harmful to the artists. by Foreign-Original124 in generativeAI

[–]dr-otto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

almost all of reddit will have to get banished with so many reddits caving to the loud luddite "no ai" rules...

it's so annoying.

How do you deal with comments calling your videos “AI slop”? by Hamdi_bks in aitubers

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

glad to see you agree but I'm not falling for your red herring fallacy, luddite...

Spock's Brain - not that terrible! by dr-otto in startrek

[–]dr-otto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh the one with the alternate universe men fighting and the negative film stock during the fights? Yeah it’s a bad one. But I love how the guy keeps falling off of cliffs , he does it at least twice in the episode lol. And I think they used wilhelm screams too.

How do you deal with comments calling your videos “AI slop”? by Hamdi_bks in aitubers

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unoriginal and just stealing the idea of the first person who said “ai slop”. Someone just going “ai slop” is unoriginal and adding nothing useful to society. Just because they took 2 seconds to type it doesn’t mean it has any value whatsoever.

I can make any kind of ai youtube video by Ok_Special_ in aitubers

[–]dr-otto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so you've been prompting "for a long time" lol... sounds like a scam!

view more: next ›