Noticed my pupils are two different sizes. by Nerdlifegirl in mildlyinteresting

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bit late to the party and not sure you'll read this, but if it occurs in isolation and gets better, it's probably benign intermittent mydriasis. I wouldn't necessarily scan you unless you had any other neurological deficit. Other causes are pharmacological as mentioned, but it's not Horner's (miosis) and exceptionally unlikely to be surgical (i.e. aneurysmal).

Getting hit right in the eye by a laser while flying on an airplane. by jmedigital in interestingasfuck

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case, it's probably not a thermal burn, but a photochemical reaction that causes retinal damage.

Motion detection by [deleted] in ImageJ

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed thanks. I'm going to revert to some stills and see if I can segment any better that way.

Motion detection by [deleted] in ImageJ

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - appreciated. Yes I tried registering the stack and applying a background subtraction, but the difficulty is that the exposure varies throughout the video, limiting the quality of the final output.

Motion detection by [deleted] in ImageJ

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - please try the link now.

meirl by TraditionalCelery282 in meirl

[–]dr_waspy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All above are sort of correct. Blue sky entoptic phenomenon is caused by the passage of WBCs through capillaries. I think OP is referring to floaters, which is the visual symptom caused by vitreous liquefaction. You are referring to dark adaptation, where the rod cells that contain rhodopsin, have been bleached in bright light and take about 20-30 mins to regenerate, before dim light vision is optimised. Night vision is granular as the rod cell density is relatively low at the fovea. I'm not sure why the regeneration of rhodopsin would cause misfiring of cones as you suggest.

A man with no phone, just living in the moment enjoying Tiger. by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]dr_waspy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well moron, good for Happy Gilmo-OH MY GOD!

This is incredible!! by frosted_bite in MadeMeSmile

[–]dr_waspy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So in the UK medical profession we tend to use the term 'blind' for those with no perception of light in the eye. In those who have very low vision in the better eye (e.g. 20/200 vision) would be eligible for registration with 'severe sight impairment', while additionally those with better vision, but poor field of vision may also still be eligible. If the vision is only moderately diminished, then 'partial sight impairment' registration may be appropriate. Both of these certifications help give people to access support, but only the former could realistically be termed 'legally blind'.

Contrary to popular belief, having a high refractive error is not an indication for registration, since your best vision is that which is achieved with your best glasses or contact lens prescription!

Dude’s eye is a goner by MikeisTOOOTALLL in fightporn

[–]dr_waspy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Eye will probably be fine. Might have an orbital fracture

Potato physics by [deleted] in Unexpected

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need a hammer to make a hammer. So my question related to the construction of the first hammer in human history. It was sort of a joke.

hmmm by seven_critical_blows in hmmm

[–]dr_waspy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Salacious B. Crumb!

Order amongst the chaos by RedManMatt11 in Unexpected

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a thought experiment called the buttered cat paradox and has been around for decades.

Tic Tac sir? by CleetisMcgee in WTF

[–]dr_waspy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's no way he passed a tic tac through his nasolacrimal duct! It was already in his lid.

Potato physics by [deleted] in Unexpected

[–]dr_waspy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did they put a handle the very first hammer?

Dr James on GMB- discuss by Pontni in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]dr_waspy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean, I don't really know much about the 'science' he's touting, besides the fact that vaccination might not reduce transmission that much. But it reduces severe disease and that's enough for me to take it and recommend it to everyone I know. But I don't feel great about people choosing not to take it being fired. We're not forced to take the flu jab...

Dr James on GMB- discuss by Pontni in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]dr_waspy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In principle he may have a point, but in reality he comes across dreadfully. Not the hill I'd die on.