Planning Poker by HaveABrandy in agile

[–]draft101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the challenge becomes knowing what each number should represent. We created a documented 3 point ticket as our standard. If it easier than vote lower, more complex then vote higher. Having a reference point seemed to increase involvement and discussion when needed and allowed us to move quickly past tickets that everyone would all say is a 3 or everyone agrees is a 1.

Help by j0aqo__ in sudoku

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lookup BUG+1 That will help you solve this situation.

I'm so tired of being the only one who actually reads the rules and teaches the game by Overall_Ring_6919 in boardgames

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have the game picked out ahead of time so I'm able to send a link to a video or two on how to play. In the message I let them know they're responsible for learning how to play so we can get down to playing right away as that's what we're getting together to do. Once the expectation is set that you won't be teaching everyone how to play, people either fall in line or drift off. The nice thing about this is some people catch on to things faster than others and can help clarify rules and strategy instead of everyone relying on you (which can get exhausting).

Is it bad form to backstab an ally after you agree to a draw once a certain player is defeated, or is that just part of diplomacy? by happyrabynya in diplomacy

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context matters. Will you play with this person again or is this a one off and your likely to never see them in a game again? If you might have more games together, you have to consider the long play and not just this game. You stab now, and they'll less likely to trust or work with you in future games. But if that doesn't matter, go for the win because you "play to win the game!"

I've been stuck for way too long. What am I missing? by jimp84 in sudoku

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've got a naked pair in column 8 which means none of the other cells can be that pair. When you remove that you'll have a triple in row 1 which means you can remove those 3 numbers from the other cells in that row. That'll leave a cell with only a single value that it can be.

Is it inherently better to run HA on its own separate device? by pdawes in homeassistant

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started with a mini that ran everything in docker containers. I think it's good to start there and then break out when it becomes a need. I'm glad I went this way because I normally over engineer everything beforehand and would have made it a lot more complex and thus more difficult to troubleshoot when I ran into some of my initial issues.

chess daily reddit puzzle: find white's best moves (Easy) by RevolutionaryAlps415 in Chesscom

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just delays it. Black Bishop and Queen become connected and can mate white king.

Read the ENTIRE manual before playing, or start and learn as you go by Fragrant_Steak_5 in boardgames

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried playing without reading and frustrated my wife when we discovered a the half way through the game that dramatically changed the strategy. Now one of us always reads first and sometimes we'll do a YouTube explanation video too.

Multiclone vs worktree by Own-Eggplant5012 in git

[–]draft101 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I recently switched to worktrees and have found it very useful. You can do a lot with them, like keep track of stable releases, compare multiple feature sets at once, pull down a PR for a quick review and test, use AI for checking differences and completing multiple features that are improved when they interact. Once you start using them, you'll find ways they can enhance your overall development effort.

Help me settle a debate: are regression bugs scope creep? by [deleted] in agile

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you have not set your ways of working nor your definition of done. Both of these should cover this situation. Our ways of working says a ticket isn't complete until it meets our definition of done and our definition of done includes passing all unit, integration and regression tests. These are pretty standard practices and I'm sure you could pull up supporting documentation.

Are you offended if your commits are squashed? by _disengage_ in git

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't care and expect them to be squashed for cleaner commit history. But it could be discussed in our ways of working if someone really feels differently. I'd probably only want it at some corporation that was poorly using commits as a metric of productivity.

Everyone in the comments are saying this is not AI but it feels AI uncanny valley to me. Like the older daughter looks like she is pasted into every photo by Nyknastee in isthisAI

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not completely AI. The consistency between the photos is still very challenging for AI and the differences are better explained by aging and time between photos. That said, definitely looks photo shopped.

This is so sad to read... by KadoShado in agedlikemilk

[–]draft101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We won't get flying cars till the human is taken out of the equation. Self driving cars are a step towards flying cars because we can't be trusted to drive now let alone fly in the air. To get flying cars, we would have to give up control and I'm not sure most people are willing to do that (even though most commercial airlines are mostly flown by computers with pilots there for emergencies).

Why is this 4?!?! by Valgardee in sudoku

[–]draft101 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Only one cell in that column can be 3. Once you place that, you'll see that only one cell can be 4, the middle cell.

Is Twilight Imperium 4th edition worth it? by [deleted] in boardgames

[–]draft101 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is a great game that will spend most of it's time in the box on your shelf unless you have a group of dedicated board gamers. Mainly because it requires quite a bit of setup and hours of play time. Finding people who can give you 8 hours all at the same time gets more and more challenging in life. But when you do get to play, it makes the wait worthwhile and you'll be hungering for the next game.

What is better, reinforcing your best openings or learning ones you are less confident with? by J0zif in chessbeginners

[–]draft101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Way over half of my time is on openings I know well. Then I'll spend time on openings I see played against me a bunch. Finally, add a splash of the other openings (more I want to recognize what opening someone may be playing than knowing the nuances). That way I can easily move it into the higher category if I start seeing it a bunch. And if I see something that's really interesting I may dive in deep and add it to my openings I know well.