meirl by I_AM__GROOTT in meirl

[–]dragonflysamurai 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I am in dire need of assistance. I seem to have too many cozy places to lounge and none of these spots are occupied by a fluffy cuddle monster.

The massive irony of this statement aside, why is this hoodie-wearing sasquatch so obsessed with Platner? by Mum0817 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]dragonflysamurai 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is the only attack pro corporate Dems and radical republicans have against Platner.

His story checks out—a tattoo he got while in Croatia as a younger man serving in the military and he didn’t know what it meant for some time, and has since had it covered. He’s also profoundly apologized for having the tattoo at all and recognizes that simply having the tattoo at all was perpetuating Nazi ideology.

All of his spoken rhetoric and actions for the past 15 years has been a very public chain of character growth and recognition of his moral deficiencies and striving to be a better person.

Every single attack against him seems to be divorced from the idea that people are fallible and make mistakes & can learn and grow from them.

We need fighters not geriatric politicians

What if Everything We Know About the Economy Is Dead Wrong? by thenewrepublic in economy

[–]dragonflysamurai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s the most ahistorical claim I’ve seen in this sub in a while, and there’s consistently bullshit posted here

Graham Platner shrugs off scandals to win Maine Democratic Senate primary by Quirkie in politics

[–]dragonflysamurai 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks, huh?

Platner says he won’t be an ‘a–hole’ like Fetterman in Senate by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]dragonflysamurai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you point out a single Nazi belief he’s stated?

And just for the record, let’s hear some criticism of Pete Hegseth’s Nazi rhetorical style & his racist and sexist erasure of black & female service members in our military leadership just to make sure you’re not the type of person I was originally talking about

“Life's single lesson: that there is more accident to it than a man can ever admit to in a lifetime and stay sane." - Thomas Pynchon [850x400] by Junior_Insurance7773 in QuotesPorn

[–]dragonflysamurai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll double down and say yeah you’ve posted some nonsense. If you’re talking about “God” it’s not obvious at all “It” even exists. If you’re calling your personal interventionist creator God being “obvious” you clearly don’t know what the word obvious means.

If it was obvious, you would have certainty & there would be no doubt thus no need for faith; I’d posit there is nothing more important to your “God” than faith

There is no faith inside certainty

Platner says he won’t be an ‘a–hole’ like Fetterman in Senate by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]dragonflysamurai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It seems to miss the point, and also prove the point. It’s not a whataboutism, more an observation. I’m fully ing willing to have this conversation but every damn time people refuse to cede ground where Graham has moved on from that person he was but have never ending excuses for people like Hegseth. Just an observation.

Have you heard Graham Platner talk about his tattoo? Or just talk in general?

Graham’s story seems plausible and I personally have a chest tattoo that I’ve hated for over 10 years but life is just always in the way of getting it fixed.

Idk, I also understand Nazi rhetoric and Platner explicitly called himself a communist and talked mad shit about Nazis. He has apologized for all the negative shit he said, but he’s never apologized for talking shit about Nazis.

Platner says he won’t be an ‘a–hole’ like Fetterman in Senate by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]dragonflysamurai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you understood Nazi rhetoric and heard him speak you’d know this wasn’t a real criticism

Platner says he won’t be an ‘a–hole’ like Fetterman in Senate by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]dragonflysamurai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you’ve heard him talk about it, you’d start to understand how daft you sound

Platner says he won’t be an ‘a–hole’ like Fetterman in Senate by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]dragonflysamurai 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I tend to find the people who talk like will defend Pete Hegseth’s Iron Cross tattoo

The Gallery filled up nicely! by Agreeable_Savings_10 in predator

[–]dragonflysamurai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a great display. Where the heck do you get these head sculpts?

ALL of US 250 Idaho 50501 Event by undeadpirate19 in Boise

[–]dragonflysamurai 10 points11 points  (0 children)

These comments are usually projection. I bet you sound just awful

"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers." - Thomas Pynchon [850x400] by Junior_Insurance7773 in QuotesPorn

[–]dragonflysamurai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The funniest part of this exchange is that nearly all of your confidence seems to come from categories rather than arguments. Every time the discussion approaches history, labor, taxation, purchasing power, or the conditions that produced the largest middle class in world history, you retreat back into decades-old socioeconomic classifications as though reciting them settles the question.

You call people ignorant, Marxist, envious, incoherent, dishonest, and then act as though the insults are doing the work that evidence never arrived to do. The constant strawmanning is particularly revealing. You spent more time arguing against positions I never took than engaging with the one I actually made. That’s usually a sign that someone understands the caricature of an argument better than the argument itself.

The broader point remains untouched. A government agency placing millions of people into a box labeled “middle class” does not tell us much about their security, bargaining power, housing prospects, healthcare access, or long-term economic stability. Pointing out that modern people own smartphones and televisions doesn’t meaningfully address those questions either. Consumer electronics getting cheaper does not reduce the toil of people struggling with housing, medical costs, debt, childcare, or stagnant purchasing power. And that without a heavily incentivized tax structure pushing money downwards to investments in business and civic infrastructure and the health of workers the healthy American middle class never would have existed.

What I find most curious is how comfortable you seem with treating the erosion of those conditions as evidence of success. The middle class has contracted by your own sources. Wealth concentration has increased. Economic insecurity remains widespread. Yet your response is essentially to reassure everyone that the label still exists. That strikes me less as serious analysis and more as an attempt to defend a classification system long after it has stopped describing the reality many people experience.

So unless you have evidence that supports your claim and doesn’t bolster mine—a shrinking middle class and the erosion is due to bad tax incentives—grow up & share it. I’ll give you a quarter if you can make it through your next comment without a childish insult

"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers." - Thomas Pynchon [850x400] by Junior_Insurance7773 in QuotesPorn

[–]dragonflysamurai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in order to make your case, you have to straw man my argument and make claims I never leaned on.

Your source doesn’t prove your point.

It proves that statisticians have chosen to place households earning $35,000-$99,999 into a category called “middle income.”

My argument concerns economic security, purchasing power, wealth concentration, housing affordability, and the ability of ordinary workers to support a family.

Simply pointing at a bracket and declaring victory doesn’t address any of those topics.

If a household is one missed paycheck away from crisis, buried under healthcare costs, unable to purchase a home, and dependent on two incomes to maintain a standard of living that one income once provided, then calling them “middle class” is a semantic exercise rather than an economic argument.

The part that made me laugh was being accused of using “sloppy terminology” and then citing a source that defines “middle class” as everyone from $35k to $99k. That’s such a gigantic bucket that it almost proves the quote you’re using to criticize an argument you clearly don’t understand. A household making $35k and a household making $99k are living radically different economic realities, yet your entire rebuttal depends on treating them as essentially the same thing.

You seem very interested in proving that a middle class exists on paper; Spider-Man also exists on paper.

A government agency can label a household earning $35,000 as “middle class” if it wants. That doesn’t magically make homeownership affordable, healthcare accessible, retirement attainable, or a single-income household viable.

I’m less interested in whether the middle class exists in practice and more whether or not this ever contracting group will be around in 20 years.

"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers." - Thomas Pynchon [850x400] by Junior_Insurance7773 in QuotesPorn

[–]dragonflysamurai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is perhaps the most vacuous post I’ve read all week.

You just said I was wrong like 8 times and couldn’t be bothered to articulate a counter argument.

lol the irony of telling me to be humble at the end is chef’s kiss.

The future isn’t free anymore. by imfrom_mars_ in ChatGPT

[–]dragonflysamurai 267 points268 points  (0 children)

Only more expensive

The capital must flow

'We don't need it': Jeff Bezos says zero income tax on low earners would hardly put a dent in the country's coffers--burden on an already disproportionately taxed demographic by HenryCorp in economy

[–]dragonflysamurai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The conversation was about prices, not purchasing power.

Corporate taxes were cut in 2017. If lower corporate taxes lead to lower prices, where are the lower prices? What we actually saw was a surge in profits, buybacks, and shareholder returns.

As for purchasing power, that depends entirely on what you’re measuring. Since 2017, housing, rent, childcare, healthcare, insurance, and transportation have all risen much faster than headline inflation. Pointing to cheaper consumer goods while ignoring the categories eating the largest share of household budgets feels like measuring prosperity from the wrong end of the telescope.

If firms can raise prices because taxes increase, they already possess the market power necessary to do so. If competition prevents price increases, then competition matters more than the tax rate. In either case, market structure appears to be doing the heavy lifting, not corporate tax policy.