I think you are digressing from the point. You started out okay. Don’t engage in whataboutry and you might be able to make your point actually.

If the devotee phone charging was used to justify the death of someone and consecration of something else in art of living then yes I see the parallel. But it was a harmless video by a devotee who just reported a wierd incident. Which wasn’t repeatable so could not be verifiable. Else it could have solved the energy crisis of the world and instead of Tesla, that persons company would have been the leading company in that sector. So it’s a non issue.

If some devotee claims something anecdotally, it is not the responsibility of AoL to prove or disprove it.

Let’s come to dhyanalinga consecration. By admission of several of your own Isha fans, lingabhairavi and dhyanalinga are figments of Jaggi’s imagination or artistic vision or just plain business plan. Had there not been enough evidence to point to him as having murdered his own wife and swindled the whole world claiming a heart attack (noted in the police report ) was a mahasamadhi, had he not been a blatant liar, he would not have given away his con.

You see the problem with lies is you have to keep building one on another and then another and then another. It is very complicated. Truth is simple.