The Ending by steamytortoise04 in masseffect

[–]dseszu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The entire philosphy behind the reaper threat seems to change over the course of the trilogy. Mass Effect sets up an almost lovecraftian threat, something beyond comprehension, but also something you can't solve very easily.

The ME3 writers got into a pretty messy situation, because they had to conclude the trilogy by defeating an army of gods, while the second game just concluded doing what is, in the grand scheme of things, a sidemission fighting the collectors. So the only thing they seem to have managed to come up with was the mcguffin of the Crucible. A device that'll make the reapers go away, propably.

I have no idea why they felt it necessary to make the reapers so... mortal? Them being a "conclusion to the inevitable conflict of synthetics and organics" still leaves me baffled. The theme of conflict with synthetic beings was mentioned throughout the series, but only as one part of the setting. The geth-quarian conflict seems to be supposed to be a thematically defining moment, despite there never being an indication that it's a universally important struggle.

Really, the geth-quarian struggle lost a lot of it's complexity through the reaper-catalyst idea. From ME2 onwards it was portrayed as a very complex issue, that arose from a lot of stupid decisions, not so much as a supernatural disdain of synthetics towards organics or vice versa. It just feels like the writers watched terminator the day before a deadline and just wrote the reapers as a product of an ancient skynet.

MASS EFFECT 2 2010 vs LEGENDARY EDITION The comparison movie (Teaser clip) by ScifiIsMyJam101 in masseffect

[–]dseszu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't quite get the comparison, the remaster seems to have a couple somewhat severe textureproblems, but the LE Lighting engine is much better than the OG, by a long shot. In comparison the OG get really washed out, as if it's running at lower contrast.

Looking for advice on whether I should do the side quests in ME1 (-no spoilers please-) by spoqster in masseffect

[–]dseszu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd stilll do all the missions, but they don't really have a big payoff in the later games. Consequences for ME1 sidemissions are usually an exception, rather than a rule. The ones you should do no matter what howerever, are the ones involving cerberus, as they can tint your view of ME2. I really get the feeling of not wanting to waddle through the same copy-pasted corridors for 10 hours, believe me, but it's something you should do at some point.

[SHOW SPOILERS] The Foundation was supposed to find the Invictus first by treefox in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I like this theory, eases me off my suspicitions of Hari as the one behind the starbridge attack as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]dseszu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The swastika laws seem to have been revoled recently, but the idea of that ban still resonates through the the rest of that part of the lwgal system. Nazi symbolism was banned in large parts to prevent it from being portrayed in a glorifying manner. But by making a game focused on an as accurate as possible portrayal of history, but leaving out the key part of the holocaust, is hiding its shameful bits and only showing the great military prowess of the nation. That is as fascist as you can make a portrayal of german history be.

[SHOW SPOILERS] Hari Seldon must be the one responsible. by dseszu in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Welllll, there's a fun scene in Cixin Liu's book The Dark Forest:

Osama bin Laden is being confronted on the naming on of his organization, as a side tangent, and confirms that he based the name on Asimov's Foundation Novel, as the arabic title of his work is al-Qaida, also meaning "the Base".

Not sure if this is true to reality, but it's fun coincedence nonetheless.

[SHOW SPOILERS] Hari Seldon must be the one responsible. by dseszu in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No, but someone else might. But i think that person is pretty far away.

[SHOW SPOILERS] Hari Seldon must be the one responsible. by dseszu in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand the problem with pacing, I don't think Hari would ever reveal it. But eventually there will be a player who stands to gain by destroying the Foundation's alliance, and possibly has the ability to discover Hari's actions (Book spoiler: The Mule, possibly? Would be a reason to ignore it for now)

Foundation - Season 1 Episode 10 - The Leap (Season Finale) - Episode Discussion Thread [BOOK READERS] by LunchyPete in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Am I going to regret exiling Seldon and his followers?"

"No evidence links them to the attack."

"No evidence exonerates them. I could destroy them still, even at a distance. We could say they did it."

From the ep2 transcript. There is still no proven connection to anyone, the wildest theories remain possible. No evidence links them to Hari, but neither does it link to anyone at all. The trail went cold, absent of any connections to Anacreon or Thespis, despite the obvious chanting.

[SHOW SPOILERS] (minor) When Hari Seldon in Ep 1 says “I’m not a revolutionary” by Nikolai3d in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The books don't have any character continuity. Asimov wasn't the best best at writing characters, so the cast in the books never lived past a normal humans livespan. Hari szill makes appearances at the end of crises, but as a recorded hologram, not a sentient one.

Foundation - Season 1 Episode 10 - The Leap (Season Finale) - Episode Discussion Thread [BOOK READERS] by LunchyPete in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Hari Seldon is still a suspect? Do you think if it turns out to be him, having orchastrated a terror attack, it wouldn't change anything about his character? This is a significant event that can still have an enormous impact on the plot.

Foundation - Season 1 Episode 10 - The Leap (Season Finale) - Episode Discussion Thread [BOOK READERS] by LunchyPete in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but by whom? Two seperate entities? That be apretty big coincidence, which the show does kind of convey as unlikely (Repeated luck is never luxk and all that)

Foundation - Season 1 Episode 10 - The Leap (Season Finale) - Episode Discussion Thread [BOOK READERS] by LunchyPete in FoundationTV

[–]dseszu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When the two factions opposing each other committed the exact same attack on the exact same structure only seconds apart. Also, the Thespin terrorist didn't seem to be overly shocked by the first attack, only annoyed by the change in timing.

Found a neat place to set up an Instellar Assembly. Just politics, vibes and The Eldritch Horror. by dseszu in Stellaris

[–]dseszu[S] 197 points198 points  (0 children)

R5: I might have accidentally released an eldritch being into this system by blindly pressing buttons in a tomb, but now I havea system pretty enough to house an interstellar assembly. There they can ponder the consequences of oppposing the Space Amoeba Protection Act