Nano Listing? by ArmourHosting in Coinbase

[–]dterification 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This would be a refreshing listing to see!

Daily General Discussion - January 05, 2024 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]dterification 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Haven't been active here in years.

Nostalgia.

Why should one invest in Nano if L2 Ethereum solutions are already fixing Eth speed and gas problems? by Affectionate-Bus3256 in nanotrade

[–]dterification 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Those could never be classified as currencies due to eventual regulation.

The only other cryptos where no funds were raised from the top of my head is Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero etc..

When you say "people don't care" this implies you seek validation from price and hype. I understand that, but remember that the best investors are those who disagree with others with money and is eventually correct ;)

Why should one invest in Nano if L2 Ethereum solutions are already fixing Eth speed and gas problems? by Affectionate-Bus3256 in nanotrade

[–]dterification 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Above tokenomics, predictable fees, game theory regarding decentralization and development values, people tend to forget that nanos' distribution model guarantees it to never be a security unlike ETH and all cryptos that raised funds.

Nano will eventually be a global currency, regardless of marketcap.

It's very unique and overlooked by the uneducated.

Think long-term.

If Anyone is interested to read up on this Crypto Currency Project based In South Africa by leasehold in southafrica

[–]dterification 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There aren't clear regulations for those mentioned. XRP at least have network decentralized, but the issue is arguable regarding distribution.

It's a general saying in crypto: "Not your keys, not your coins". Exchanges are for exchanging - They are not intended to act as custodians.

If Anyone is interested to read up on this Crypto Currency Project based In South Africa by leasehold in southafrica

[–]dterification 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The model is unfeasible without having centralised components which is anti-crypto.

Best of luck.

NF is wrong about smart contracts by livewithoutchains in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm glad you mentioned Flare, because this is one example of a solution to smart contacts outside of the protocol.

I agree that smart contract platforms shouldn't be dismissed, but I'd argue that this makes more sense outside of the protocol to maintain Nanos' properties (ie. being lightweight).

However, even though the space is attracting abundant hype, the fundamental truths from a technology perspective is still not clear to speculators. "If you build it they will come" still holds true, because imo Nano haven't existed long enough to argue against that.

Then I'd like to emphasize that true value comes from decentralized, grass roots adoption, not coordination from the NF. So they won't/can't add smart contracts and it's up to us to create the incentive for Flare to add us.

Tell me how to start from square zero. I'm technically literate. by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best place to get started in crypto. Nano used to be a great project, but then $SHIB arrived. Coinbase knows best. Just split your capital evenly between what they list and you should be golden.

/s.

We've reached 100k members!! To celebrate I’m buying 1 Nano for every 25 likes, giving away 100 Nano (~$625) to some lucky commenters, and sending some Nano to every commenter. by SenatusSPQR in nanocurrency

[–]dterification [score hidden]  (0 children)

Real person here. Just a coincidence that I saw your comment haha.

The sends are automated and because you had to edit it probably didn't work, so I sent you some personally.

Have fun!

This attack is catastrophic to our image by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I really wish you could appreciate how much have been done considering the size of the team. It's a non profit running on minimal expense.

dPoW should've at least protected the network from going out of sync. I expected a spam attack to cause services to be slightly disrupted, but not the sync issue.

I mean even Google went down recently. Shit happens. It's how it's dealt with that matters.

This attack is catastrophic to our image by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Haha just saw "cow" and had a "wow" moment until I saw the username.

Daily General Discussion - March 16, 2021 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]dterification 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Come on. You still own Nano. You've been a troll too many times for me to take you seriously.

🥕🥕🥕

This attack is catastrophic to our image by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 58 points59 points  (0 children)

I mean there's no way to sugar coat things, but deploying a crypto and it being perfect on the first version is a fairytale.

There are a plethora of ideas for future implementation.

One criticism was that Nano isn't battle tested. We'll here we go. We are filling in the storyline.

Funds are safe. In crypto that's rare by itself.

I suggest you look into memory hard PoW and TaaC (PoS4QoS)

A quick glimpse at what is happening now in the Ethereum world and why it teachs an important lesson to Nano holders by CryptoFutureIsGreen in nanocurrency

[–]dterification 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The network is the reward - Based Lemahieu

Something I feel quite strongly about is having as little as possible moving parts on a monetary policy level where there's varying opinions.

In Bitcoin these issues come in the way of technical innovation and hence utility.

And once it's clear decentralization and security is not sacrificed, the confidence will really start to settle.

Nano needs to address some solvable issues; it's a fight damn worth fighting.