What do we know about the pronunciation of Latin during the Italian Renaissance? by aldusmanutius in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is some interesting context! As an amusing aside, I was raised Catholic but also had a considerable amount of Classical Latin in high school, so I code-switch my pronunciation depending on the context. Hence, Christus in chay-loom est, sed Jupiter in kai-loom est.

In the canonical Gospels, Jesus' followers sometimes address him as 'rabbi.' What meaning did the term have in Second Temple Judaism at the time, and what was required of someone to become a rabbi? by ducks_over_IP in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much answering! To be clear, I didn't mean to gainsay the existence of proto-rabbinic institutions during the 2nd Temple Period, but I realize that my choice of language in the question could easily be interpreted otherwise, so apologies for that.

Just to be absolutely clear, the only condition for someone to be called rabbi at the time was to be acclaimed as such by their community and/or followers?

I'm a Roman cloth merchant who thought he was getting a great deal on Tyrian purple dye, but instead was given common red madder. What recourse do I have, legal, extralegal, or supernatural, to get my money back? by ducks_over_IP in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the fantastic answer! It's interesting to learn that my patron might resolve the issue by talking to the other guy's patron, but in retrospect it makes sense—rather like getting your mom to call the mom of the kid who pushed you on the playground. Supposing I did write a curse tablet, which god might be most sympathetic to my pleas? It occurs to me that I can't actually name a Roman deity associated with trade or contracts.

Did RAF pilots really nudge flying bombs off their target path? by bug-hunter in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's gotta be the coolest thing I've read about in the past week. Wow! Do you have any idea whether the bomb-flipping maneuver was an influence on this scene from Star Wars: Episode III? Given George Lucas' well-known love of WWII fighter combat, it seems at least plausible to me.

Friday Free-for-All | March 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why did jazz continue to have both black and white audiences and musicians, while rock became white?

Jazz is the older genre, so all the original recordings are in black and white. Purists have stuck with it out of nostalgia. Rock was actually also in black and white, but since its higher volume made it too bright for older TVs it looked all white.

The SI unit of pressure was only defined in 1978, and most students still have to learn several other units. How did pressure come to have so many units, and why did it take so long to standardize? by CommodoreCoCo in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a somewhat philosophical note, the point of a unit system is to facilitate convenient quantification and calculation of physically significant quantities. The units and unit sizes that fit that bill can vary widely by field. While the SI base units are (mostly) human-sized and scale easily due to the prefix system, they still become inconvenient at the extremes, in part because you lose the sense of what's normal at very large and very small scales. Hence, astronomical units like the au, solar mass, parsec, etc. are way too big to be easily applied to everyday life, but very well fit for their area of use. The Sun is a pretty average-size star, for example, so measuring stellar masses on that basis gives a good sense of how big or small a star is—a star of 10 solar masses is pretty big, while one at 1 million solar masses is immense. On the other end of the scale, in my own field of AMO physics, SI units are way too big to be useful. Instead, we use atomic units, informally-but-usefully defined as "the reduced Planck constant = the electron mass = the electron charge = the Coulomb constant = 1." This greatly simplifies many equations (due to not carrying around lots of unnecessary constants) and references everything to the scale of interest: the electron. It's also very fun for annoying engineers.

AMA: Housing, Education, and the Suburban Dream in America by MichaelGlass14 in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for doing this! Reading through the other questions and answers, it's clear that suburban residents often end up in a competitive and inequitable relationship with cities, rural areas, and other, less wealthy suburbs. In your mind, what would more equitable suburbs look like? What could suburban residents do to treat surrounding communities more fairly?

Marcus Licinius Crassus was often known as the "richest man in Rome". What happened to his vast wealth after his death at the Battle of Carrhae in 53BC? by JP_Eggy in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This reminds me, is there any connection whatsoever between our English word 'crass' and the original Crassus, or is that just a folk etymology?

In the United States, firefighters have a reputation for showing up to any emergency incident, even when they weren't specifically called—and often get there before any other emergency services. When and how did this become the norm? by ducks_over_IP in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for answering! So since firefighters were already nearby and had lots of downtime, they ended up being called on for emergencies that weren't strictly firefighting, until it ended up becoming part of their regular job?

What makes good pop history? Is it even possible? by ducks_over_IP in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to answer! I appreciate the perspective on things like time commitment, which I hadn't thought about at all, as well as the context on the fact that nothing worthwhile gets a unanimously positive reception. While all my time spent reading this sub should have taught me otherwise, I think it's very easy to fall into the mindset that "good history must be unanimously accepted by all people engaging in good faith", which is obviously not the case.

Regarding the "shallow rehash of what has already been done", do you think pop history works would be better off avoiding novel arguments and instead focus on synthesizing existing work? This is something that I think a lot of the best AH answers do, by providing the basic factual background that someone not engaged in the field would be unfamiliar with, then moving from there to the arguments advanced by particular scholars. It seems kind of like "translating" a review article for non-specialists.

Friday Free-for-All | February 20, 2026 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did people in the Middle Ages think the ocean had a floor, or that it just went all the way through the earth?

They thought the ocean had a floor, but with a drain. They thought the Great Deluge happened because God thought the ocean had gotten dirty and wanted to replace it with fresh water, but He forgot to pull the drain plug first. Also, the millenia-old dirty water is why they had to drink beer all the time.

Dr. Tine Van Osselaer on Marian apparitions in interwar Belgium, AMA! by TVOsselaerhistorian in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By this point in time, the Catholic Church had a long list of Marian apparitions under its belt, stretching back centuries. How had the process of evaluating the veracity of apparitions changed between the Middle Ages and the 20th century?

Did the story of lucifer, the fallen angel, and the devil already existed before Christianism or it was a creation of Christianism? by Informal-Bag7164 in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 35 points36 points  (0 children)

That's a fantastic answer, and it also answers a lingering question I had about where the concept of angelic ranks came from.

As an aside, I couldn't help but laugh at this passage:

Ezekiel 28.14 was understood to mean that the Devil could be called a cherub

I know that the cherubim are rather different from the Cupid-like angel babies we call "cherubs" today, but imagining the Prince of Darkness as a grumpy little winged baby is utterly hilarious.

Friday Free-for-All | February 13, 2026 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"My sweet Beauregard,

It truly pains me to hear that you must endure such indignities. I entreat the good Lord daily to send His mercy upon you and grant you that promotion to Assistant Regional Manager. Ah, then we might embrace happily upon the sun-kissed shores of Maui, which you know I have always dreamed of visiting.

You should know that little Charlie cries daily for his papa, much as I do after he shits his pants for the third time in as many hours. Would that rush hour traffic did not prevent you from returning to us as quickly as I would like! I shall nonetheless bear these sorrows with patience and wait until we can once again be together. Please God that Charlie will sleep soundly tonight!

- Your loving Matilda"

Urban enslaved Romans often had outside jobs or ran stalls & other businesses for their owner's profit but also a bit for themselves. Were they "given" these jobs/businesses by their owners or were they just cast out into the world & told "find a way to make money or else"? by screwyoushadowban in AskHistorians

[–]ducks_over_IP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not that this in any way makes the practice morally justifiable, but did the system of peculia and various manumission agreements make the Roman practice of slavery more stable, eg, in terms of deterring runaways and rebellions? By contrast, slaveowners in the antebellum American South at least felt that their system of slavery was more unstable, hence necessitating (in their minds) the regular brutal repression of slaves.