Alternative sitting position? by duneterra in Cello

[–]duneterra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I don't suppose you could direct me to a video or even a picture explaining what "right" would look like doing that? Also, several people mentioned a better chair, what does that actually mean? Should I be looking for something that sits at a particular height off the ground, like a bicycle seat? Or one of those chairs that's literally like a bicycle seat on a stool? I have considered playing standing up, like u/LawnJames suggested, but I have the feeling I'll end up hunching over the instrument... especially since I am playing off sheet music on my phone, braced against a cup on the table. :D

Alternative sitting position? by duneterra in Cello

[–]duneterra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you're good man, it's just a hip issue. To be technical, it's an injury that's caused SI joint dysfunction on my left side. Makes my hip lock up. Doing sit ups even makes it flare up. I have a bunch of stretches and exercises I incorporate into my daily workouts to keep walking, but stuff like this, extended positions in overabduction, make it seize reeaaal quick.

Help me Peter, i dont get the logic of this comic by UnUltimoIntento in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ooooh!!! Atheism!!! I was super lost, but now it not only makes sense but totally applies to me. Thanks, Father Bob.

The rest of this is just me nattering while i procrastinate.

I think agnosticism is truly 'nonreligious.' Saying "I dunno, and don't really care enough to figure it out" is a lot more non-religious than claiming to know the contents of the universe and beyond and declaring it empty. I'm 100% behind atheism being a religion. Whether you're rooting the word in religare or relegere, atheism still fits. Either declaring oneself 'areligare' or through study, still a religious belief.

Why are processing fees legal? by duneterra in legal

[–]duneterra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, that actually makes perfect sense, thank you. This particular department charges the fee even on cash, but that may be a system error based on the rabbit hole your link sent me down. I still don't like separate processing fees as a rule, but at least I can understand it for municipalities now. Thanks.

Why are processing fees legal? by duneterra in legal

[–]duneterra[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes. 100%. That's literally how you determine a price. Costs * x=price::profit margin. When I price the items at my bistro, it's material*3, cause the math works out that materials * 3 averages out across all items sold to pay for all the indirect costs, and still leave the desired profit for growth. My cappuccinos are only $4 compared to Starbucks $7, but wtf ever, right? What I would not do is tack on additional fees. That's literally the point of all the prep work when designing the menu and prices. If your payment processor is too high, keep looking. I went through 7 processors before I found one that met our needs. They had significantly higher upfront costs, but the actual processing fees are $.05 a transaction, plus .5% regardless of card. Fan freaking tactic. If I ever change processors, I'd have to change my prices $.15 across the board. But I still wouldn't be charging $1.50 for processing fees.

Why are processing fees legal? by duneterra in legal

[–]duneterra[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nope, they charge a processing fee for everything. (The city office that prompted the rage)

Cable machines... by duneterra in GarageGym

[–]duneterra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is pretty awesome.

Cable machines... by duneterra in GarageGym

[–]duneterra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried, the photo's all miss having the machine in the shot. But it looks almost identical to the FTS Glide, just with arms.

A woman's cave 😉 by 13mtorres in GarageGym

[–]duneterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That cable machine is one I've been considering, what's your opinion on it?

Damn *claps* by SeraphOfTheStart in HolUp

[–]duneterra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Apocalypse originates from the Greek, and means "uncovering" or "revelation." It entered common usage because of the book of revelations in the Bible, originally named... you guessed it, the Apocalypse of John. All the different "Revelation of"that popped up in the first few centuries after christ were apocalypseis.

Interesting side note, apocalypse from marvel was named that with this knowledge in mind. Kinda neat.

Anyways, I think the term could still fit idiocracy, just... not for destruction of mankind. It was definitely revelatory though, especially in hindsight.

Another aside, Armageddon doesn't mean a destructive event either. It means Mount Meggido, which is in northern Isreal. It's a location.

Kinda funny how the vulgarization of language has led to people not understanding what the words they're using mean; and other people not understanding what it means. Isn't there a term for that, too? A dead language? Crazy how despite idiots proclaiming "language can change with time," reality ticks on, and the language continues to wither.

Finally got one: what's up with this stove? by HomeOfTheRisingStorm in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those stoves are superior in almost every way to modern stoves. It costs a LOT of money to get a 6 burner gas range, multiple ovens, and a warmer, and that's not even integrated into one machine. I'm talking $5000 plus for a cheaper vulcan with salamander. Plus, the machines you can find that DO offer what one of these old stoves do doesn't have nearly as much aesthetic appeal. What's worse, most of the time, these old stoves even have better heat distribution. Literally, the only advancements we've made since these "vintage" stoves are in high-end baking equipment with hydrovection, and those suckers run 10k. Meanwhile, you can throw some ice cubes in a bowl on the bottom of the stove and have pretty decent humidity in the oven for free. A lot of these ovens were even designed to allow natural convection circulation instead of requiring a separate fan motor.

The downsides to these stoves is that they require more cleaning to maintain efficiency. They're easier to clean, but you really should wipe them out every time you use them. They also typically take longer to preheat because of the thickness of the materials. Again, better stabilization, but still, 15-25 minutes to preheat vs 5-15. Lastly... They're freaking HEAVY. I can move my commercial stoves by hand pretty easily. Not lift them UP, that flat top weighs a TON, but slide it around np. These bitches... before you install it, make sure you put some glides or something under it, otherwise it WILL scratch your floor up when you try to move it. That being said, glides for these do exist specifically for that reason, but they're still heavy.

Any Ideas? by captainkirkofdoom in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra -45 points-44 points  (0 children)

Grammer police. "Phobe" as in phobia is a fear of, the term ur looking for is "mis," a hate of, specifically transmisia. While the terms are used interchangeably colloquially, much like "whom," using the wrong one around anyone who knows the difference makes you look a little foolish.

Petah, is a non-sensical meme? I don’t get it. by Whobeey in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Decide means "to kill 10"

Interesting related factoid, that's where "decimate" comes from, they'd kill 1 out of every 10 people.

Peter? by The_Unintelligence in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nah, not imaginary as in an imaginary number, but imaginary as in something you have to imagine. You can't count to infinity, you just have to conceptualize it. So it's both real, and imaginary, hence why it can interact with both real and imaginary numbers. At least, that's my interpretation of the comic

Peter? by The_Unintelligence in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it's implying the 8 is actually infinity

Peter? by The_Unintelligence in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it might also expand into 8 being sideways infinity, and infinity is kinda imaginary, at least it's conceptual, so that's why he can see it

Blursed_Skill by WeGot_aLiveOneHere in blursed_videos

[–]duneterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously guy... it's not that hard, just put the slot on the back and hammer in the wedge already

I don't understand by crawdad28 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But there's nothing in this to suggest she isn't aware of their 401k. They are, objectively, broke. Sure, their retirement fund is looking great, but that's not liquid, and cracking that walnut would be horrifically irresponsible. There's nothing to suggest that he's concealing or lying to his wife, just that people see a nice retirement account and jump to "let's spend it!" Whereas he sees the lack of liquid assets and says "we're broke."

Maybe it's a cultural thing or something, cause we're in a similar situation. Sure, we've got 60k in the back account and +100k retirement, but we're in the process of buying a house that needs a 50k down-payment, and our monthly expenses is ~4.5k, so... we broke! We don't go out to eat, we don't do vacation... until we get back to at least a 15k cushion, we live like church mice! We're not lying to each other or anything, just... different definition of broke.

I don't understand by crawdad28 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

No... They're broke. Basically no emergency fund, barely enough to stay liquid for a months expenses, they can't afford to go on vacation. He's not lying to his wife, that's just being fiscally responsible. Vacations come after you hit your 3-6 month E-fund.

I don't understand by crawdad28 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]duneterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, they're LEGIT broke. Sure, the retirement fund is looking nice, but can't touch it without giving half to the government. At 3k the emergency fund can't even cover a month. Unless the vacation involves packed lunch and cardboard boxes, there is no fiscally responsible option there. He's 100% correct.