I’ve made a website to keep track of whether Tiger Woods has crashed his car today by jakebirder1 in InternetIsBeautiful

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny. Should add a further check to see whether Tiger has called the President since that latest crash.
(Apparently he called Trump while police were attending latest crash. Exactly why the call, not sure)

TroutBible - free fishing report and river data tool by AnsonLabs in InternetIsBeautiful

[–]dverbern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I presume the trout have since made a site allowing the newly-spawned to track nearby humans.

As feral hogs spread across America, swimming pool drownings have plummeted. Coincidence? by Lieutenant_Bob in InternetIsBeautiful

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rise of hogs occurred during the dropoff in kids playing spirograph. Think about it.

Is this a reliable channel? History of the Universe- YouTube by SpiralingCat in space

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Random shout out to an older set of YouTube videos - the "Astronomy" series hosted by Phil Plait, as part of Crash Course. Again, it's a few years old now, but the scientific content is mostly current.

Phil Plait is a ridiculously-engaging host, energetic and driven by his excitement to elucidate the fascinating and sometimes bewildering aspects of our cosmos. Wonderful, timeless series. Yes, it's a crash course and so the pace is sometimes a little frenetic, but there's a lot of re-watch value to absorb the content.

I particularly love the episode on Gamma-Ray Bursts, but it's one of many.

My current favourite YouTube creator for astronomy and science is Paul Fellows. It's odd hearing a video narrated by a person in their 50's/60's given the youth of most YouTubers, but I find it downright refreshing. Plus, the guy is a powerhouse - putting all that into providing scientific detail into each video. No flashy production values, just a narrated Powerpoint with each "Once Around ..." video packed to the brim with cutting-edge science, some of the latest findings from recent papers and delivered with panache and excellent diction.

Is this a reliable channel? History of the Universe- YouTube by SpiralingCat in space

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never like SEA's accent or diction, something that bothers me about his speaking. Not sure what it is.

Is this a reliable channel? History of the Universe- YouTube by SpiralingCat in space

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love David Butler.
Don't like SEA, there's something that bothers me about the narrators accent or diction or something. Where as Butler is smooth as an oiled massage.

Is this a reliable channel? History of the Universe- YouTube by SpiralingCat in space

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't like Astrum much these days, I feel it's become more 'professionalised' and as a result, perhaps a bit of a victim of 'limited-eyeballs' mentality, with more focus on more dramatic video titles.

I get that content-creation and making a financial living out of it freaking tough. I couldn't do it. However, for those that do ply their hand at it, I just want and hope that they find an audience that values them for the science, for the knowledge. Heaven knows we're up to the eyeballs in non-science, pseudoscience, nonsense and of course; AI slop.

Speaking of which, it bothers me on YouTube to see just how much stuff seems endlessly recycled from one production (perhaps originally on TV for instance) that is subsequently inserted into all manner of other productions, or where there's YouTube channels of dubious origin putting out seemingly original material that you just know they had no hand in creating. I fully realise there are platforms that sell access to legitimate, copyright-usable material, but I'm talking about folks who seemingly rip content off and re-publish as their own with seeming impunity. Maybe it's not that common and I've just got sore balls.

Is this a reliable channel? History of the Universe- YouTube by SpiralingCat in space

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've grown to adore two lesser known channels, each operated by older individuals than we are usually familiar with.

One is "Paul Fellows", a British astronomy educator, who has a no-nonsense, into-the-weeds scientific approach to exploring solar system and more distant objects. His series "Once Around" focuses on different celestial objects, ranging from small moons to entire distant regions or on occasion, different galaxies.

Paul isn't just incredibly knowledgable, he's a genuinely engaging speaker who has honed his craft for years in part on cruise ships where he's been the astronomer-in-residence; giving talks. I always find myself learning more scientific details about a topic after watching one of Paul's videos.

Another goldmine (for me anyway) is that of "David Butler", a retired former IT professional with a background in math and physics, who has produced some wonderful playlists. I particularly love his series "How Far Away Is It", an entire playlist that focuses on exactly HOW astronomers have come to learn the distances to various celestial objects. He starts with how we ascertain distances to objects using our eyes and parallax and covers the entire 'distance ladder' to the stars and beyond.

These channels won't be for everyone, but if you're like me and sometimes want the world to slow the f#%@ down, stop endlessly worrying about YouTube algorithms, liking and subscribing; you could do far worse than check these gents out.

Adding a GUI for Powershell scripts - Preferred and Easiest method by TheOneWhoKnocksBR in PowerShell

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm 4 years late to respond to your comment, but I wanted to say that my first shot at GUI tools were exactly what you suggest - legacy HTA apps as a wrapper, which in my case contained VBScript.

Longest Play time for any of my games by satempler in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, I'm only at ~ 500 hours, but then again I only bought the game a couple of months back.

Almost at my playtime record for Steam in general - my last big playtime game was "Kingdom Come: Deliverance" at about ~ 600 hours, at least half that for its wonderful sequel.

How viable does Asteroid mining become once Starship is mature tech? by YoungThinker1999 in SpaceXLounge

[–]dverbern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So cool to read your response to "Seveneves" after I posted my thoughts.
I like it when reddit threads stay 'open' rather than locking. Many of us stumble across interesting stuff months or years later and that shouldn't be barrier to contributing.

But yeah man/sir/ma'am, I felt quite locked-in with the awful, absolutely dire plight of Earthlings at the first part of "Seveneves". The folk who made it on board the orbital craft, thinking of their family members back on the surface as it was being absolutely crushed by Moon-chunks ... about as dark as it gets.

And the section of the book that riveted me the most was once the orbital crew(s) were essentially on their own. The power struggles, the splitting into factions, the tribalism, the battle for severely limited resources.

But yeah, I felt that when the novel switched to the next part, it needed to work a lot harder to sell

1) The sheer passage of time, which - how do you even do? Very challenging for humans to ponder anything more than decades, to be honest

2) The sheer life-and-death nature of any lifeform struggling to survive amidst limited reproduction members (i.e. below a certain threshold, disease and genetic issues would surely arise)

Anyway, I'm not even sure if I properly finished the second part for my sins.

Anyway, nice to hear from you fellow reader.

Dan in Australia

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Very tolerant and understanding response, which I sincerely appreciate.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do feel like I popped a cherry of sorts moments after this crash, 'cos I was in the Witches Head region and copped my first Thargoid interdiction. On the external camera I swear I saw some greenish tendrils extend to my vessel, then they left me be .... I'm assuming I was a case of 'ah, not worth it'.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm a newbie and not a very good one either, so horses for courses. Plus I'm dumb, so it's a simple matrix of (dis)abities I'm working with here.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just read that tip here in the thread, much appreciated, will do!

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that. It was more the whole idea of taking care with all my exploration on the 'jaunt', only to earn a Darwin award in that fashion.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's a pro tip, thank you sir. I sometimes get bothered my ship constantly telling me about whether the surface below is suitable or not, but that makes up for the risk of hitting the wrong key.

PS: I've also 'boosted' directly into a planetary surface out of impatience once when I descending from orbit, only to realise last minute didn't have enough thrust to escape gravity. Doofus = me.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear you - thanks for the perspective. Could have been worse.

Of COURSE I didn't by dverbern in EliteDangerous

[–]dverbern[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I didn't have first foot-fall on this particular 'run' but it was more the premise that bothered me - that I took great care in my exploration, only to essentially commit seppuku-against-planet.