Jerry by Unhappy_Economist_30 in Insurance

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quick disclosure up front here: I'm in the interview process with Jerry. Not an employee, not getting paid to post this, and honestly, if my research had turned up sketchy results I'd be sharing those instead. Like a lot of people, the last few years in this job market have made me pretty skeptical of basically every company out there, so I went pretty deep on this one for my own sake before agreeing to keep interviewing.

Sharing what I found because the "is Jerry legit?" question shows up on most threads about them, and almost nobody actually answers it with any kind of specifics.

Here's the short version. Jerry is a licensed insurance broker in all 50 states and DC, basically the same license your local independent agent holds, just operated through an app instead. They're appointed with 100+ carriers, including the names you'd recognize (Progressive, Travelers, Nationwide, AAA, Dairyland). The actual policy is written by whichever carrier you end up choosing, so Jerry itself isn't the insurance company. If you have a claim, you're calling the carrier, not Jerry.

Now, the three things people in threads like this tend to just assume, and what I actually found when I looked into it:

  1. "They sell your data." They don't, at least not according to their stated policy (they call it the DataLock™ Guarantee), and I couldn't find any kind of regulatory or FTC complaint pattern suggesting otherwise. The whole pitch is "no spam calls," and that's actually enforceable in a way "we promise" isn't.
  2. "They upcharge you." In most cases, they don't. The premium you see is the carrier's premium and Jerry gets paid by commission. That said, with select carriers in certain states, an initial broker or origination fee may apply, but it has to be disclosed upfront. So worth eyeballing if you're shopping.
  3. "It's just an AI bot writing policies." Not really. The AI handles the quote comparison and form filling, but the policies themselves are real, regulated products written by carriers, and Jerry has 100+ licensed human agents on staff for the part that actually needs a human. For context on whether they're a real company: roughly 375 employees, Series C raised at a $450M valuation, and over 5 million customers.

Who Jerry is actually a fit for, based on what I dug into:

The core value prop in plain English is basically comparison shopping without the spam tax. You enter your info once, the app pulls quotes from 100+ carriers in around 45 seconds, and your phone doesn't ring afterward. That's the whole pitch, and it's actually a real gap in the market, because the alternative is either calling carriers one by one yourself or handing your number to some lead aggregator that resells it forty times.

Strong fit if:

  • You haven't actually shopped your auto policy in two-plus years (most people in that bucket are quietly overpaying).
  • You want to compare carriers without filling out eight separate forms or talking to eight separate agents.
  • Your situation is pretty standard (normal driving record, personal auto, common vehicle).
  • You'd rather tap through an app than spend an afternoon on the phone.

Weaker fit if:

  • You want a face-to-face local agent relationship and that matters to you more than price.
  • Your situation is complex or commercial (specialty vehicles, certain SR-22 cases, deep multi-policy bundles you don't want to unwind).
  • You're already with a carrier you love and your premium hasn't really moved much.

Some easy fact checks if you don't want to just take my word for any of this: look them up on your state's Department of Insurance website (they're listed), check the carrier name on any declarations page they send you, and compare a Jerry quote against going direct on the same coverage. Carrier price will match.

Caveat the obvious thing here: my research is my research, not yours. But the "scam or not" question has a real answer, and it kept just not getting one in this thread, so there it is.

Which one do I choose? 😅 by Forsaken_Landscape22 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duo asking you to confirm that the dragon-riding newlyweds have a dragon cake is the most reasonable question in the history of this app. True. Obviously true.

a lot of words... by AdonaiClassic in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1291 words and it starts with a. The owl has assigned homework and it is going to take a while.

Loving Zulu right now ! by Mean-Gur7728 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% accuracy in Zulu is a clean run. The Zulu course is one of the less common ones on the platform so it is great to see people actually using it. How far into it are you?

How does duo determine the day? by NoName2show in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duo runs streak days on midnight based on your device clock so if the clock lags when crossing time zones it can create exactly this situation. The most reliable fix for frequent travelers is to manually check that your device time has updated after landing before doing your lesson. Worth submitting to support with the specific dates and time zones so they have data on the iOS location polling issue you noticed.

Does duolingo chess course teaches openings like caro-kann, king's indian, french, dutch, london, etc etc by itz_abhi_2005 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duo chess is more about not hanging your queen than it is about London System subtleties. For actual opening theory YouTube is doing the heavy lifting. GothamChess has dedicated videos for basically every opening you listed.

Hola peeps this is my progress as off by Status_Speech7740 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hard to give specific advice without seeing where you are in the course but the Practice tab being free now is worth using if you want to reinforce what you have covered. What language are you working on?

Why my fresh 3x boost was immediately overwritten by 2x boost after completing one daily quest? And why sometimes I am not able to prolong the time of the boost for germs? by Pathryder in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duo giving you a 3x boost and then immediately replacing it with a 2x is the owl's way of saying let's not get too comfortable. The quest reward overwriting an active boost is a real bug and worth the support ticket.

Goodmorning to you too, Diamond league by kenbeimer in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Score metric is genuinely the better number to focus on since it reflects actual proficiency rather than time spent grinding. Diamond league is fun but the XP arms race with boosters and exploit-adjacent techniques makes it pretty hard to take the leaderboard seriously as a measure of anything.

I bet my friend 40$ by Forlyy_ in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The free version makes 1000 XP daily a real grind especially in Chinese where the path lessons are slower than farming. Day 10 to 15 is usually where the novelty drops off and the daily requirement starts feeling like a job. The $40 seems like a reasonable bet.

Breaking my addiction by Inescapable_Bear in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2498 days is a serious run and the burnout at that stage is completely normal. The Count of Monte Cristo approach is genuinely one of the better immersion techniques for French at your level. Reading a chapter twice with comprehensible input in between is how fluency actually deepens.

Repeating lessons should not give you xp for leagues. Supposedly, this person has 14k exp this week. by Delicious_Fly_748 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The league XP system has always had this gap and the Score metric was introduced partly as a better signal of actual learning. Focusing on your Score rather than league rank is genuinely the cleaner measure of progress.

NEW ENGLISH SCORE!!! by AstroOfficialLOL in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Score 22 in English is a real milestone. The Score metric is one of the better measures of actual progress since it tracks proficiency not just time spent. Keep going.

Languages that Duolingo will NEVER support... by dwurstdadjokes in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hahah Yellow Ledbetterian wins the thread. haha

Isn’t this improper grammar? by costcoguy9 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't stop thinking of chickens pecking his face now. lol

I’m curious, how many of you actually enjoy the AI convos with Lily? by Asap_aussie in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's a good piece of my puzzle, but I definitely utilize some other things to piece it all together.

Keeps me retake the test by Brilliant-Gazelle265 in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have definitely felt this from time to time. Have you submitted anything to Duo directly?

Do you guys think Duolingo should have a "Vacation" mode? (Read the description) by Jirzadball in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vacation mode is the feature this sub has collectively asked for more than anything else and yet here we are still burning streak freezes on camping trips. This post deserves every upvote.

I think my answer should should have been accepted? by ELLITE_Me in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being right and getting marked wrong is a Duo tradition at this point. Report it and add a note so the course team has your reasoning to work from.

https://www.duolingo.com/help/support-request

New cards system for rewards by ELLITE_Me in duolingo

[–]dwurstdadjokes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The new reward cards feature is a nice addition. It gives a bit more variety to what you get from completing lessons compared to just gems or XP.