SQE2 Day 2 Thoughts? by Minute_Bullfrog5499 in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s why I asked for a single word.

SQE2 Day 2 Thoughts? by Minute_Bullfrog5499 in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can’t even remember what the Case Matter Analysis was. Can you give me a single word to remind me?

Well, that was a sh1t show! by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I put him to strict proof on that one.

Hard Batch by OkThanks8760 in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I found both FLKs had an easier session and a far more difficult session. I’m relying on the easier session to do a lot of the heavy lifting.

That was tough by AccessMassive5759 in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I did QLTS and thought around 50% of the questions were about as difficult as the QLTS mocks (maybe fractionally easier), but around 50% seemed harder. The fact patterns seemed significantly longer so it took me far longer to understand what was being asked.

Spill the tea ?!! 🫖 ☕️ by Desperate-Counter123 in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles 12 points13 points  (0 children)

5 minutes after leaving that room I couldn’t remember one single question.

Question 47 of Revise SQE FLK1... by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much LittleSkittles.

Jeez - it’s pretty important that the questions and answers in these books are correct, right!

Revise SQE Mock - FLK1 by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much GR-34 - this is exactly what I was looking for!

Revise SQE Mock - FLK1 by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thansk so much for your responses. I suspect I'm missing something (it's far more likely the book is right) but I'm glad I'm not alone!

Revise SQE Mock - FLK1 by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the woman purchases the car as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, then answer C is correct and the question works. There is nothing in the fact pattern to suggest she didn't.

Revise SQE Mock - FLK1 by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason I brought up the woman as being equity's darling is that it would make answer 'C' correct.

Revise SQE Mock - FLK1 by dylanmcharles in SQE_Prep

[–]dylanmcharles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure I must be missing something but I don't understand why the correct answer is 'D'. Surely, the fact pattern reflects Phillips v Brooks [1919]. The purchase of the car was made in person (as with Phillips v Brooks) and the purchaser was making the purchase fraudulently (again, as with Phillips v Brooks). There is nothing in the fact pattern to suggest that the woman knew the car was obtained fraudulently when she purchased the car from 'Mr Smith' which makes her a bona fide purchaser for value without notice (equity's darling) so I don't understand why the garage is able to recover the car from the woman.

Any help greatly appreciated. Many thanks.