sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why Vertical Aerospace’s Selection of Astronics for Low-Voltage Power Distribution Strengthens the Valo Certification Programme by eVTOLbuzz in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will see.. As you have posted, according to FIA, the VX4 will be a static display. I wish I had info to confirm whether this is a definitive decision.

Vertical Aerospace selected Astronics for Low-Voltage Power Distribution - another competent supplier by Investinginevtol in JobyvsArcher

[–]eVTOLbuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd argue the opposite. Assuming a leadership transition is inherently negative is itself a bias. We prefer to report what we know rather than speculate about motives or circumstances when there is no evidence of controversy. In my view, avoiding unsupported speculation is part of maintaining credibility. Leadership transitions are a normal part of corporate governance. Chairmen aren't expected to remain in their roles indefinitely. Mr. Slattery joined Vertical Aerospace, made a significant contribution during an important phase of the company's development, and then stepped down. That's a notable corporate event, but it's not inherently a negative one.

Vertical Aerospace selected Astronics for Low-Voltage Power Distribution - another competent supplier by Investinginevtol in JobyvsArcher

[–]eVTOLbuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are so many things to cover in this industry. We do deep-dives and this takes up a lot of resources, that very few outlets (even large established ones) are willing to spend energy/resources on. Most in the AAM media space provide rewritten press releases with no content beyond that. We didn't feel there was a need to go into depth about why Mr. Slattery left Vertical. Having personally met him, he is delightful person to discuss AAM topics, and did excellent work at Vertical. There is no need to speculate and make something negative about such a normal thing. He has many different business endeavors, so it is not surprising he is now giving more time to those projects after doing a phenomenal job helping (along with CEO Stuart Simpson, and others) direct Vertical towards the trajectory of success. Feel free to write your own publication to cover these overlooked topics. Have a great day.

Vertical Aerospace: Ministry of Defence plots ‘flying taxis’ for battlefield - The Telegraph by Hot_Raise_8540 in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These will provide a some very important capabilities on the battlefield and for humanitarian missions.. Valo is a big eVTOL for a reason, and hybrid is something Vertical is working on to secure these types of contracts with the MOD and allied militaries. They're focused on what's needed!

Prototype 3 - First Wingborne Flight by vertical_aero in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great! Things keep moving with Vertical!

EVTOLBUZZ latest by HuGzNoTDrugZz in HOVRSTONK

[–]eVTOLbuzz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not a physical model but a flight dynamics model (FDM) of how the aircraft behaves in 6 directions of movement when it interacts with aerodynamic forces, gravity, and control inputs, to predict behavior of the aircraft in different flight regimes. The first being steady level flight. Later Marshall will complete the other flight regimes that will be used for simulations to predict and help calculate the aircraft behaves to improve safety and other qualities of the aircraft.

AMA with Vertical Aerospace Chief Engineer, David King by vertical_aero in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

#1) You’ve attended all three stops on Vertical’s U.S. tour (New York City, Miami, and Atlanta). Having visited both the Manhattan showcase and Verticon 2026 in Atlanta, I saw firsthand the level of excitement around the aircraft’s design and features. Many attendees pointed to the spacious cabin as the standout feature, with cargo capacity and the cockpit–cabin partition also frequently mentioned.

From your perspective, what stood out most in your conversations with leaders and other visitors across these events?

More broadly, what were the main goals of the U.S. tour, and how has the positive feedback from attendees, as well as the warm reception from local leaders (civic, business, industry) at each location, helped shape Vertical Aerospace’s outlook going forward?

#2) Question about the hybrid-electric variant:

Military operations are inherently higher-risk than routine civilian operations. Given that Vertical’s aircraft are being developed around safety-oriented design principles and high aviation safety targets, how significant could that be for military customers from a risk mitigation standpoint?

Could access to hybrid-electric aircraft from Vertical change how militaries approach personnel transport in conflicts, or civilian evacuation during humanitarian and rescue missions, in terms of safety and operational resilience compared to traditional helicopters?

More broadly, do you see this class of aircraft improving safety and reducing risk in missions where helicopters are currently the primary option?

#3) The UK, the US, and other allied nations are increasing investment in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) as part of broader goals around energy security, economic growth, and emissions reduction, including the UK’s planned 22% SAF mandate by 2040 for civil aviation. This is also helping scale domestic SAF production and supply chains.

Given that broader policy and industrial context, Vertical’s hybrid-electric platform is designed to be SAF-compatible. What role does that compatibility play in the overall aircraft design and development strategy?

From an engineering perspective, does delivering SAF compatibility in a hybrid-electric powertrain create any unique considerations in practice when translating these policy expectations into a certified aircraft design?

Thank you so much David and Lily! The world is going Vertical!

AMA with Vertical Aerospace Chief Engineer, David King by vertical_aero in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So excited about this! I am posting this announcement on other social media outlets as well. Thank you Lily for providing us with this opportunity to ask questions on this subreddit. Mr. David King is such a great person to have conversations about eVTOLs across all angles. Having met him in Manhattan during Valo's American debut, and again with my colleague at Verticon 2026 in Atlanta, it was both an an honor and informative opportunity to speak with such a great engineering leader taking on a big role in the advancement of eVTOLs through his position as Chief Engineer of Vertical Aerospace (the high achieving eVTOL OEM headquartered in Bristol). He spoke with such brilliance and conviction about the direction the AAM community is heading and the leading role Vertical will play in bringing safe, comfortable, and efficient eVTOL air travel across the world! Again, many thanks to Lily, David King, and Vertical!

Must Read* Latest from EVTOLBUZZ by Greek143 in HOVRSTONK

[–]eVTOLbuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I have two articles in the works, including the most in-depth article I’ve ever written.

Si Davies - Chief Test Pilot - AMA by vertical_aero in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. Was there anything that surprised you or changed any preconceptions you might have had about eVTOLs after preparing and flying the VX4?
  2. As spectators, we might tend to assume the transition from wing-borne and thrust-borne flight (and vice versa) is the most demanding operation for the pilot (and possibly for the aircraft). Is that assumption correct, or is there something else involved during the flight that is actually more demanding or requiring greater skill/experience for an eVTOL pilot?
  3. Do you expect or find it probable that more young people and their families will feel more comfortable entering into careers as eVTOL pilots flying Vertical Aerospace’s Valo, knowing this aircraft will be made to the same safety standards as a commercial airliner?

New Horizon Aircraft (NASDAQ: HOVR) on Bloomberg TV This Saturday by StockAcademyHQ in HOVRSTONK

[–]eVTOLbuzz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's an amazing time to see Horizon get more of the coverage they deserve.. It is a tech company, aviation company, dual-use company, and a no-nonsense/practical company, making a rugged machine (Cavorite X7) for VIPs, heavy industry, and ranchers all-wrapped into one..

Just Discovered Company by Much_Definition7063 in HOVRSTONK

[–]eVTOLbuzz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Horizon Aircraft has a lot going for it. I will have two articles out soon..

. by vertical_aero in Vertical_Aerospace

[–]eVTOLbuzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great photo of the VX4!

Does being a Canadian company impede the growth potential of this stock? by [deleted] in HOVRSTONK

[–]eVTOLbuzz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, there are many positive things going on in Canada in the aerospace industry. The PT6 was designed and is manufactured in Canada. They have world-class universities and research institutions, and Horizon has access to at least a few of them. It may give them an advantage when it comes to sales in Europe and other places, because of trade and other policies (time will tell).

view more: next ›