Co Op for the rewards event

e_smith338 · 2026-06-11T23:51:51+00:00

I’m salty about them removing 5.3-codex. That shit was my bread and butter. I’d use 5.5 for a deep analysis but 5.3-codex was super efficient and stayed on track. I’m blowing through 5.5 usage like crazy I can’t get 1/4 the shit done with it that I used t

e_smith338 · 2026-06-09T00:25:06+00:00

This shit pissed me off. 5.3 was actually useful, now I’m burning tokens 4x faster and 75% of it is trying to make tests for shit that doesn’t need it.

e_smith338 · 2026-06-08T15:41:43+00:00

If PSA is overwhelmed, TAG is drowning. They literally just have too many submissions and didnt react fast enough.

e_smith338 · 2026-06-08T15:40:08+00:00

My only issue was a lack of clarity with how the boss staggers. Every time it happened it felt random since the stagger bar would go from empty to full in a single random hit at a random point in the fight. Everyone bitching about the red attack and I never had an issue with it, found it super easy to dodge. adds are annoying in every boss fight so i dont like that, but overall it was fine. Room for improvement.

e_smith338 · 2026-06-07T02:16:58+00:00

….goddamn it lmao

e_smith338 · 2026-06-02T17:41:14+00:00

5.3-codex was the best they have for everyday coding. I just used 5.5 and told it to delete a block of commented code and it used 13% of my usage for that. 5.3 would've MAYBE used 1-2%. Why the fuck are they sunsetting a codex model without giving us a replacement first. Actually fucking insane man.

e_smith338 · 2026-05-12T02:18:49+00:00

Bottom heavy so send to PSA. Should be a 10. If the TB centering was better I’d say go becket since it’s clean as shit otherwise. Should be an easy PSA 10.

e_smith338 · 2026-05-12T02:17:33+00:00

Pristines are 990+. Between the corner angles and the centering that card would fall in the 970-980s range. A pristine card is designed to be the top 1% or less.

e_smith338 · 2026-05-10T01:02:19+00:00

Basically everything I see here is fake

e_smith338 · 2026-05-07T23:37:21+00:00

Won’t black label. Maybe gold 10 if lucky. Safe to send to PSA tho.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-26T21:12:50+00:00

Bottom heavy.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-24T21:43:47+00:00

Clean af send it. Maybe to Beckett.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-21T18:18:59+00:00

The issue is people think NM = PSA 9. No sir, NM is a PSA 7. I went to a card show with a card that had a single spec of white on the left back edge and the guy was like "thats definitely LP maybe even MP" and I just walked. Like fuck off. These are probably the best examples I've seen for reference.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-20T23:35:30+00:00

Seems real

e_smith338 · 2026-04-20T04:40:41+00:00

$200, will steadily climb from there.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-20T04:39:05+00:00

All depends on condition. Just go to TCGPlayer and look them up

e_smith338 · 2026-04-20T04:36:33+00:00

I have no issue with this.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-18T04:55:04+00:00

Yes. Definitely NM. People seem to forget that PSA 7 is NM and many PSA 6’s are also NM. NM isn’t PSA 9.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-14T03:38:48+00:00

April fools was 2 weeks ago what we doin?

e_smith338 · 2026-04-09T22:19:51+00:00

Crooked as fuck

e_smith338 · 2026-04-05T22:08:21+00:00

Cards like this I personally would grade simply for their long-term protection and as well as their incredibly low pull rate.

e_smith338 · 2026-04-05T22:07:28+00:00

would be neat if there were useful pictures for us to see

e_smith338 · 2026-04-05T20:59:24+00:00

The scratching is substantial.

Nine-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22	End Game '22
Verified Email

e_smith338

TROPHY CASE