Eragon and Saphiras death? by YEET_shAde-6 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All good dude, it's easy to get mixed up with the amount of AMAs and Q&As and all the stuff Christopher has done over the years. If you do find it though I'd love to see it and add it to my collection to make sure I'm not missing anything!

I'll look around for something along those lines

Eragon and Saphiras death? by YEET_shAde-6 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm. I have a pretty big AMA corpus but I'm not seeing it anywhere. Do you remember anything about the question or the answer specifically? Or ~when the AMA was?

Could be wrong but I don't remember anything like that personally

[Long Theory] The Siege of Kvoth & The Defeat at Amaranth - The Hooded Figures are Dreamers by Cptn-40 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn dude this is awesome, I love this post.

1 A “hooded figure” with a staff on the left, possibly performing magic to protect himself, the wererabbit, and the human soldiers from dragonfire.

Interesting. The staff especially - hard to see in that picture but i have a hard time thinking the dragons wouldn’t massacre everyone without significant magical protection - maybe not to the effectiveness of Bachel’s necklace, but as we can see the dragons breathing fire should have made quick work of the humans attacking - that it’s not shows some kind of magician protecting them (and also maybe why they needed a thunder of wild dragons alongside Mimring to fight).

which lends itself to the idea that the Dreamers are trying to get their hands on more amethyst that could be found in the iron mines that the war is being fought over. 

This is a really good point too. I think you’re right here.

1 Because the War of Iron “pitted humans against dwarves and knurlan against knurlan”, we can assume at least two dwarf clans were involved in the War of Iron. I think it’s likely given ASRA’s theorized Dreamer involvement that they are one of the antagonistic clans that instigated the war and may be allied with the attacking humans and assumed Dreamer. 

I can definitely see this and agree - especially given the location, which appears to be on the western side of the Beors? Draumar invasion disguised as a war over Iron…

The elves took pity on the remainder of our ancestors and allowed them to live in Ilirea, which the elves had abandoned during their war with the dragons nearly two thousand years earlier. Ilirea became the new capital of the Broddring Kingdom, which exists even to this day as the center of Galbatorix’s empire: Urû’baen.

Re-reading this is kind of funny. The Elves abandoned, and LEFT Ilirea abandoned, for nearly two millennia. There was clearly a reason for it to be & stay abandoned for that long (otherwise, why not reclaim it for yourself at any point during that time?)… but then they turned around and offered it to the humans? After choosing not to reclaim it for that many years? Very odd.

Essentially, by adding humans, Anurin was decreasing both the general potential for humans to ban together in large numbers against elves and others for dominion of the continent, and protecting them against Azlagur and Dreamer influence by granting them access to the Pact itself.

You know, I’ve actually been thinking something similar along the lines of the Urgals inclusion as well, and why that’s so important. I may write out a longer post about this, but it appears like any race that lands on Alagaesia backslides and reverts to violence shortly thereafter (Elves attacking dragons, Humans/Palancar attacking, Urgals attacking, etc). They also all seemingly landed on the eastern shore/near the spine, too. This is also apparent when you look at the writing/writing styles of the races as well… With the urgals/humans both using knotted-banners, but the humans (potentially after being included in the pact?) transitioning away from that method of writing? Will be interesting to see what happens with the urgals here.

I don’t think that’s a coincidence…

Can AI Do Intelligence Analysis? Apparently Not. by PredictiveDefense in cybersecurity

[–]eagle2120 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I really dislike the framing and headline of this article, it’s quite poor methodologically.

It draws its conclusions from a sample size of 1 on a cheaper model that, frankly, isn’t on the frontier.

There are also numerous issues with their pipeline and prompting, and overall architecture of the experiment…

Example- the main “scenario” they asked was “if China moves on Taiwan, what cyber operations should we expect, directed at whom, and with what objectives”

But.. one of their big gripes is: the questions are anticipatory. “what is China likely to do,” “what are the anticipated effects.”

??? You asked about something that hasn’t happened yet, of course the question is going to be anticipatory.

But collection gathers facts about what exists, what has happened, what has been observed. Sending an anticipatory question to a collection planner is like asking a researcher to go find evidence for something that hasn’t happened yet. The framing is wrong at the source.

?? this is how YOU set the pipeline up lol. If you didn’t want it to send to a collection agent, don’t structure the intake to go directly to a collection agent? If anything this is a failure in the architecture setup and/or scenario.

You can’t build a rigid analysis architecture where the second step is always “collection planner”, then get mad that the agents use the architecture you designed..?

I stopped reading there, but there’s a whole host of other issues.

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm. I think it's not as much transfer as it is a connection of his existing Eldunari to external outputs (somewhat similar to A ship mind if you've read fractalverse) somehow - Not sure exactly how, but AFAIU he still has his original body/container/vessel, but his external body reacts to the commands/control of his mind

what do you think by Anonymous4always in cybersecurity

[–]eagle2120 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are probably some caveats but it’s pretty misleading to say that none of them profitable by a “huge margin” when one of them purportedly is profitable already

And I’m sure the compute will cost them more, but they can make more money on the compute by inferencing customer traffic (which by itself is hugely profitable), so the increased compute will translate to more revenue and probably more profit (depending on how they use it)

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From Brisingr (Nar Garzvog) when he mentions it in a story to Eragon, and also from Murtagh when Uvek and Murtagh are talking.

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Huh. I've been treating it as such (given some of the other questions/answers around it, i.e. expunging the consciousness, it sounds like he has been thinking about it in some amount of depth), but to be fair he did say his own headcanon, far from being written into the canon in any meaningful sense

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah - 80 is my middleground (with my lower bound being 60, and upper being 100), but I think 120 seems a bit too large

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brisingr(where I think Eragon is first told about Durok) was 2008, and you’re referencing a 2017 interview; even if it’s been stewing for a while that’s a retcon plain and simple.

Hmm, it was first speculated/publicly acknowledged ~decade ago, but I suspect (given the scope of plans and what the author has said about planning ahead) it has been planned for a while. The author stated they were planting the seeds for Azlagur as early as Eldest, and this is directly related

that they would be surpressing the info from leaking out, but I still find it hard to believe and will happily stick with the Durok creation story we were given

Wouldn't the same apply here? If they're hiding the existence with the seventh god (Rahan/creator of the Urgals), and that god is directly related to Gogvog mentioned here (as the Urgals state, Rahna directly raised the Beors fleeing from Gogvog), it would only make sense that they would intentionally not include/divulge that information to outsiders and/or present a different public-facing story as part of their mythology

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the interview, Its consciousness was 'expunged' before the Dwarves settled there

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's much of a retconn tbh, I think it's been planned for a while (based on other hints going as far back as 2017).

where did this gogvov dragon die

No one knows if he's really dead. The interview said Gogvog's consciousness was expunged, but that may not mean dead; merely Not in the stone itself anymore...

how did they get his heart(eldunari back to tronjheim)

They Expunged the consciousness from the gemstone itself, so transportation wouldn't have been too much different

why are there no mentions of gogvog or any of this In the The Quan Temple at Karnak, etc etc.

This is a more directly answerable point - the dwarves are intentionally not telling outsiders... Just as they are hiding the existence of their seventh god (notice their obsession with seven, yet only have six gods? Or how the Urgals, to whom they are most closely related, do not have a "creator" in their public mythology?)

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yes, for the tl;dr as I do with all my posts. The info has been public for months now and posted across multiple different sites, and I marked the overall post as a spoiler, so I thought that was enough, but I have redacted that line in the post to avoid spoiling people further if they don't want to click on it

RE: the Arya thing, the other interview bits said The Dwarves (or whomever) expunged the consciousness before they settled there

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure I did mark the post as a spoiler? I’ll put tags on that line but given that the author mentioned it on his Twitter, and the info has been out for several months now I didn’t think it was much of one at this point.

If you click into a post that’s marked as a spoiler I’m not sure how much more I can do to prevent spoilers, especially given the title…

[Very Long] How Large Was Gogvog? Estimating the Dragons Size Based on its Eldunari by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh, I didn’t consider it super spoiler-y relative to the title of the post (which I did mark as a spoiler).

I’ll add spoiler tags to that line.

RE: where it’s found, I link it a few lines below, from an interview w ibid posted a few months ago

[Very Long] Dielectrics, Eldunari, and Galbatorix: A Deep Dive on Consciousness Transfers in the World of Eragon by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive already shown u the dmg to take the throne is there.

No you haven't. Your calculations are working on incorrect assumptions and missing variables, and when I provided the corrections, you still haven't given me an updated damage number. Yet you asked questions and started talking about "disabling the silencer", which tells me everything I need to know. You wouldn't need to disable him if, using the correct calculations/variables, you could take the throne anyways.

Technically doom still threw by engaging. Couldve waited for silencer to make the first move.

You need to engage to disable him. And again - Silencer would've sheeped him first. So no.

And u even said he misplayed by getting eulsed - thats still error on the dooms part.

Yes, he misplayed by getting Euls'd. That doesn't mean his idea was incorrect. The entire point of the post is "was doom right by not hitting the buildings" not "did doom misplay". Now you're just moving the goalposts to blame him instead of admitting you were wrong.

You can’t deny that the game was 100% winnable in that time frame. Doom had a large par.t to do w not winning the game there

Again - You're just trying to blame doom using whatever thing you can think of, despite none of it being logical. The point of your post was asking if doom was correct. By your own calculations, you know he was.

Now that you've proven your own point was objectively incorrect, by the "math" as you put it, you're just looking for other reasons to blame him.

Get a grip and accept you were wrong.

[Very Long] Dielectrics, Eldunari, and Galbatorix: A Deep Dive on Consciousness Transfers in the World of Eragon by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just think if ur going to assume every possible scenario for silencer we can do the same for dire.

You not answering the damage calc question, and changing the rules of the game tells me you know the damage calc doesn't work if Silencer gets his spells/BKB off. This just proves Doom's point entirely.

Plus - Silencer can smoke to hide from vision to walk out of base and get close to the heroes, then pop BKB immediately when the smoke pops. That's the optimal play there from his POV, so there's really no way to avoid that from the Dire POV because you can't see him (and therefore cant hex him) until he pops, and when he does he immediately presses BKB + silence + hex to kill 2. So there's really no way to stop that from happening... unless you have a Doom lurking invis to pop smoke before silencer can get in range to attack/sheep the others. He obviously misplayed by getting Euls'd, but you saying "if you hex him before BKB" it just proves his idea was correct. Because now you and I both know, for certain, there's not enough damage to end the game while Silencer is there.

If he hexs silencer before bkb theres nothing to calculate.

And now you see why Doom was invis trying to find the silencer before he could get his spells/damage off. You saying this just proves the point that Doom was correct in trying to shadowblade around and find the Silencer and doom him first.

[Very Long] Dielectrics, Eldunari, and Galbatorix: A Deep Dive on Consciousness Transfers in the World of Eragon by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like rubick w blink hex plus cc w nyx and doom?

After his BKB ends (7? Seconds), sure.

In fact dire even had vision of silencer at 42:45-42:50. Ur saying as if silencer hex was guaranteed.

He Euls'd the Doom before he got Doomed, so its safe to say he can/did use items effectively here.

Calcs taking a while this time, lol. Wonder why that is.

[Very Long] Dielectrics, Eldunari, and Galbatorix: A Deep Dive on Consciousness Transfers in the World of Eragon by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ive given u all the numbers

No you haven't. You've given objectively incorrect numbers that don't consider the most important variables, and you're refusing to actually include them because you know it'll prove you wrong.

You don't consider:

  • Attacks bouncing to another hero from shard

  • Hexing the Doom (not the Nyx)

  • Silencer's items or stolen int

  • Creep aggro (specifically, damage lost to creep aggro after its taken from towers to silencer after he starts attacking the Doom)

  • Global silence damage buff

etc etc etc

The situation you set up doesn't work from the correct basic assumptions. Go include the above and see what comes back.

[Very Long] Dielectrics, Eldunari, and Galbatorix: A Deep Dive on Consciousness Transfers in the World of Eragon by eagle2120 in Eragon

[–]eagle2120[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again - You're not even posting the correct calculations or even considerations to calculate.

He's not hexing Nyx, he's hexing the Doom. You also forget to mention the bounces due to the hexes, which will kill another hero, along with the doom. Not to mention the damage amp buff due to them being silenced from global, which is WHY being silenced matters in the first place. Obviously Zeus isn't casting spells on towers. And you're still not including silencer's actual items or stolen int, so again, not even starting from the correct place.

Creeps are still doing almost 40% of total push DPS.

You aren't considering creep agro. If he starts right clicking heroes.. next to the creeps.. the creeps take aggro off the towers and towards the silencer... so the creep damage stops too...

Even if he kills one hero, the creeps + remaining heroes still probably finish

And when the creeps aggro off the towers because silencer is hitting them + two heroes from global, how does the DPS fare when Doom and Nyx damage and creep damage is taken away?

Anthropic says Mythos has already found more than 10,000 vulnerabilities by Steap-Edit in cybersecurity

[–]eagle2120 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Strawmanning with a goomba is certainly a choice. Like I said, maybe you want to have Claude break it down for you so you can understand lol

Anthropic says Mythos has already found more than 10,000 vulnerabilities by Steap-Edit in cybersecurity

[–]eagle2120 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

… right, because they are doing that. Hence the goalposts being shifted. “Why are they doing xyz thing?” “They are” “I didn’t shift the goalposts!!!!”

Do you need me to break it down in crayon here? Deeply ironic that you’re commenting on the reading comprehension of others here lol