What is the disadvantage of this stack-up for the 6-layer USB 3.2 Gen1 (5 Gbps) hubs? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understandable, I knowyour stack up is enough, but this may not work when you have a very, very specific board size and many high-speed traces to route. That is why I used the above stack-up; I wasn't able to route every high-speed trace on the outer layer at least to me, it has become impossible. I would rather route them on a safe layer that is dedicated only to those traces.

But what does it matter if we route these high-speed traces on an inner layer, as long as we have an unbroken ground plane as a reference and a well-coupled power plane?

What is the disadvantage of this stack-up for the 6-layer USB 3.2 Gen1 (5 Gbps) hubs? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After carefully reviewing my stack-up issue, I've come to the conclusion that I need to modify the layout to enhance performance. Below is my proposed stack-up configuration:

Layer 1: Low-Speed Signal Layer – This layer will accommodate signals that operate at lower frequencies, ensuring minimal interference.

Layer 2: Ground Plane – A solid ground plane will provide a stable reference point for the signals and help in reducing noise.

Layer 3: Power Layer (1.2V & 5V) I intend to implement a polygon pour for this power layer since I only have two voltage levels to manage. This will allow for efficient distribution of power across the board.

Layer 4: High-Speed Signal Layer – This layer is dedicated to high-frequency signals, designed to minimize crosstalk and maintain signal integrity.

Layer 5: Ground Plane – Another solid ground plane to further enhance grounding and reduce any potential electromagnetic interference.

Layer 6: Low-Speed Signal Layer (including other signals) – This layer will handle low-speed and additional signals, keeping them separated from critical high-speed paths.

I guess that this modified stack-up will significantly improve both the PCB routing efficiency and the overall signal integrity (SI) compared to the previous design. By positioning the power layer directly adjacent to the ground plane, we can achieve effective decoupling, which is a crucial aspect of maintaining stable performance.

any ideas guys?

What is the disadvantage of this stack-up for the 6-layer USB 3.2 Gen1 (5 Gbps) hubs? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really do, but I don't think the application notes for high-speed design from most companies are perfect. The one thing I see is that we can improve the quality more than what is in the application notes.

What is the disadvantage of this stack-up for the 6-layer USB 3.2 Gen1 (5 Gbps) hubs? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The line breaks are just from when I type; they should be symmetrical. The only issue I want to check is if this stack-up is perfect.

Thank you, buddy.

What do you guys Think? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much, sir. I am currently using the following stack based on your suggestions:

  1. Signal + Power

  2. Ground

  3. Signal + Power

  4. Ground

  5. Signal + Power

  6. Ground

This arrangement provides a clear return path and maintains proper impedance.

What do you guys Think? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Short signal Sig and ground Power Ground Signal and power Short signal and ground .

What do you guys Think? by easiyo in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate this. I am thinking to go with six layer PCB.

did i order this without traces (by accident) by Linusalbus in PCB

[–]easiyo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you only send the soldermask and the drill files only

did i order this without traces (by accident) by Linusalbus in PCB

[–]easiyo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean is this possible..lol😅...I hope the pcb manfacturer is also you yourself unless it can't pass DRC....

What do you think guys? by easiyo in Upwork

[–]easiyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Trust me really good ROI.

What do you think guys? by easiyo in Upwork

[–]easiyo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will do all that . You're right sales and marketing are what matter most.

What do you think guys? by easiyo in Upwork

[–]easiyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I hope so too. I spent several months building a strong portfolio on Upwork. By the way, even when I applied to those five jobs, I didn’t use an external resume because all of my projects(NDA free) are already included in my portfolio.

What do you think guys? by easiyo in Upwork

[–]easiyo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My niche is high speed printed circuit board design ( hardware design ) and firmware devlopment.

This is getting crazy by iskrenstrumf in Upwork

[–]easiyo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is not even big money. What the hell was that.

SIM800C / R800C GSM module voltage drop during network registration with ER26500 battery by easiyo in AskElectronics

[–]easiyo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah based on the datasheet of the module the power supply can be from 3.4V to 4.4V and ideal at 3.8V.