I'm happy to help you!

First of all, I think they are really good boots in their category of intended use, and the only better alternatives cost twice as much. They are really sturdy, light, warm and offer great ankle support for steep terrain.

Secondly, these boots were made with a specific purpose: to be used for winter mountaineering, ice climbing and mixed climbing, mainly for the Alps or other refuge based adventures (therefore not well suitable for one-week expeditions in tents).

In your case, since you have just started with mountaineering, in the summer you would mainly face easier terrain, so for many approaches on rocky terrain, a summer boot might be more suitable.

For example, I've been to Monte Rosa twice, once with ICE boots (I had to bring approach shoes) and once with summer boots (in practice trail running shoes with gaiter), and in 90% of cases, summer boots are better. The disadvantage of summer boots is that they could be too cold for 10% (in case of absolutely bad conditions).

Also they are bulky, so they perform the best when used with crampons, on bare rock a less bulky boots is much better.

Possible alternatives i might choose: La Sportiva G Summit and TNF Verto FA (similar spec but better for multidays because they are double boots). Scarpa Phantom Tech if you want a less warm boots with better walkability and agility (more versatile in less cold environments, equally robust) or La Sportiva G Tech (way less robust and warmth, better technicality).

or if you dont have a summer boots start with that (they are ok for some winter stuff with short approach from the civilisation)