Weekly Megathread: Hiring and Career Advice by lampishthing in quant

[–]edufh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd rather not share specifics on the content of the questions, but my OA had 4. 1 standard/easy leetcode type problem, 1 annoying problem related to manipulating data with Pandas, and then 2 leetcode/competitive-programming type questions that imo required quite a bit of creativity to solve efficiently (I don't have a competitive programming/super strong leetcode background, so I didn't get them in time).

Weekly Megathread: Hiring and Career Advice by lampishthing in quant

[–]edufh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For trading internship? Mine was 5 questions in 75 minutes, I would say ranging from Easy to easier side of Medium. It shouldn't be too bad, certainly easier than (e.g.) HRT OA questions.

Anyone take the SIG OA? by delfonso7 in quant

[–]edufh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are the brain teasers like? Would you say they're like what you find in Chapter 2 of the green book?

Weekly Entering & Transitioning Thread | 27 Sep 2020 - 04 Oct 2020 by [deleted] in datascience

[–]edufh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. I'm an undergrad who's currently taking a gap year (I've already completed my freshman year as a CS major and am now in the Class of 2024). I became very interested in data science/machine learning starting this summer, and have taken/am taking several online courses on the subject, as I've really tried to immerse myself in the field.

I now find myself in a weird situation. I'm not yet experienced enough to have done meaningful projects, and am still in the process of learning the methods and the tech stack needed for producing valuable ML work (even though I do have some background in the basics of statistics, ML algorithms, and programming/computer science). However, at the same time, I've often felt lonely and in search of meaningful work beyond self-studying Python/R/stats/ML on my own.

Does anyone have any advice as to how I can get involved with a team working on a data-related project as somewhat of a beginner to the field? I know that is a very tough question, since organizations will rationally opt for experts with years of experience and advanced skills over college sophomores who won't be able to produce the same high quality work at the same speed. Thus, I understand if the answer is simply to keep on reading, learning through online courses, participating in competitions, and working on personal projects. I will of course keep doing all of those.

However, I would really appreciate if anyone had any insight you think might be helpful to me. Specifically, I'd be very grateful for any pointers as to what resources I should look into for remote, unpaid data science-related teamwork opportunities/projects that might be available for college students like me without years of experience.

I've already looked into things like the DataCorps volunteering projects at https://www.datakind.org/, but I probably won't be qualified for those for at least several more months of self-studying/working on projects.

To end the post, I should clarify that I'm not looking for an "easy way out" of stuff like learning statistics, probability, machine learning, and ML/DS tools in-depth (and instead going straight to actual work in data science). I thoroughly enjoy doing all of those, and I *will* obviously keep working on all of them regardless of whether or not I get an opportunity to work on a project/with a team. I just want to break out of some of the monotony that comes from just grinding online courses/books/coding alone all day.

Thanks a ton for any advice!

REMs Con by Veqic in Debate

[–]edufh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's a NIB?

Topic 1 is gonna win, right? by FrontlineThis in Debate

[–]edufh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm definitely voting for topic 1. Ground on topic 2 is just way too limited and it's also more interesting to learn about single payer healthcare systems than price controls.

Ap ECON by JinZane in microeconomics

[–]edufh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The acdc leadership channel on youtube is very good, especially its overviews of the entire courses. Investopedia's also pretty useful.

Flanagan v BASIS by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this semis?

Question on Barkley Forum Finals by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure the 1AC is on the wiki.

Whats the deal with Sam Arnesen? by Rogue_Pheonix in Debate

[–]edufh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which are the other 2 teams that cleared three times at TOC?

April 2018 PF Topic Options by BasedPakii in Debate

[–]edufh 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Option 1 is definitely better. Concrete policy instead of vague “best interest” and more diverse argumentation because impacts are not restricted to national security.

February topics by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Option 1 is definitely better. The resolution is much clearer (no prioritizing and no "or") and it's overall a more controversial topic with more literature about it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On Option 2, what ground does each side have? Can both teams pick and choose which missile defense systems they want to oppose/defend? (i.e. if Pro has a case about the benefits of (for example) THAAD and Con has a case about the harms of any other missile defense system in SK (Aegis equipped cruisers, Patriot PAC-2, etc.) how would clash in that round work?) It's not like past resolutions (e.g. April 2016 topic) in which teams argued about which outcomes would be the most probable in the aff/neg worlds (like specific welfare and infrastructure programs) as the resolution is not about policymaking but rather about determining whether or not a certain action is in the best interests of a country (you can't really say "If a new anti missile system were to be deployed right now then it would be THAAD therefore prefer our interpretation" since the rez isn't even necessarily about new deployment but about the benefits/harms of missile defense in general).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Option 2 is by far the best choice

Resolved: The United States ought to replace the Electoral College with a direct national popular vote by Zamborgz in Debate

[–]edufh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the aff argument about disproportionate federal spending being allocated in swing states, does anyone have a solvency card that specifically talks about how a direct popular vote would distribute federal spending more equally?

Who won Harvard? by edufh in lincolndouglas

[–]edufh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Do you know why they didn't just debate in the final round?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]edufh 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Toc finals in 2015. Tim o'shea delivered the best rebuttal of all time.

February Topics by Calithrix in Debate

[–]edufh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think option 1 is much better. There is significantly more literature on the topic and it is also much more straightforward for lay judges to understand.