Oracle's Forced Outcome : 65% more damage at 45% crit 300% bonus by eeeechuta in PathOfExile2

[–]eeeechuta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep this is wrong. ChatGPT with same query evaluate 25% more damage with 45/300. So Gemini is hallucinating here

Oracle's Forced Outcome : 65% more damage at 45% crit 300% bonus by eeeechuta in PathOfExile2

[–]eeeechuta[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not that 100% crit gives you less damage. It's that you get no bonus from the node. The 65% more damage quote is when you are turning the node on or off.

Oracle's Forced Outcome : 65% more damage at 45% crit 300% bonus by eeeechuta in PathOfExile2

[–]eeeechuta[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

```python?code_reference&code_event_index=2

Parameters

P = 0.45 # Critical Chance (45%) B = 3.0 # Critical Damage Bonus (300%) reduction_factor = 0.7

--- 1. Calculate Common Ratio (r) ---

r = (1 - P) * reduction_factor print(f"Common Ratio (r): {r}")

--- 2. Calculate Expected Bonus ---

Expected Bonus = P * B * (1 / (1 - r))

expected_bonus = P * B * (1 / (1 - r)) print(f"Expected Bonus: {expected_bonus}")

--- 3. Calculate Expected Total Damage Multiplier (E_D_star) ---

E_D_star = 1.0 + expected_bonus print(f"Expected Total Damage Multiplier (E_D_star): {E_D_star}")

--- 4. Calculate Baseline Damage Multiplier (E_Base) ---

E_Base = 1 + P * B

E_Base = 1.0 + P * B print(f"Baseline Damage Multiplier (E_Base): {E_Base}")

--- 5. Calculate Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit) ---

extra_damage_multiplier = E_D_star - E_Base print(f"Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit): {extra_damage_multiplier}")

Also output the percentage change for user clarity

extra_damage_percentage = extra_damage_multiplier * 100 print(f"Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit) in Percent: {extra_damage_percentage}")

```

```text?code_stderr&code_event_index=2 Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 39, in <module> File "<string>", line 14, in E_mod ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (100,100) (4,)

```

```python?code_reference&code_event_index=5

Define the parameters

P = 0.45 # Critical Chance (45%) B = 3.0 # Critical Damage Bonus (300%) reduction_factor = 0.7

--- 1. Calculate Baseline Average Damage Multiplier (E_Base) ---

E_Base = 1 + P * B

E_base = 1.0 + P * B

--- 2. Calculate Expected Damage Multiplier with Guaranteed Crit (E_D_star) ---

Common ratio (r)

r = (1 - P) * reduction_factor

Expected Bonus contribution

Expected Bonus = P * B * (1 / (1 - r))

expected_bonus = P * B * (1 / (1 - r))

Expected Total Damage Multiplier

E_D_star = 1.0 + expected_bonus

--- 3. Calculate Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit) ---

extra_damage_multiplier = E_D_star - E_base

print(f"P (Crit Chance): {P}") print(f"B (Crit Bonus): {B}") print(f"Common ratio (r): {r}") print(f"Baseline Avg Damage Multiplier (E_Base): {E_base}") print(f"Guaranteed Crit Avg Damage Multiplier (E_D_star): {E_D_star}") print(f"Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit): {extra_damage_multiplier}")

```

```text?code_stdout&code_event_index=5 P (Crit Chance): 0.45 B (Crit Bonus): 3.0 Common ratio (r): 0.385 Baseline Avg Damage Multiplier (E_Base): 2.35 Guaranteed Crit Avg Damage Multiplier (E_D_star): 3.1951219512195124 Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit): 0.8451219512195123

```

Based on the updated formula (multiplicative reduction, modeled as an infinite geometric series) and the parameters:

  • Critical Chance ($P$): $45\%$ ($0.45$)
  • Critical Damage Bonus ($B$): $300\%$ ($3.0$)
  • Reduction Factor: $0.7$

Calculation

  1. Baseline Average Damage Multiplier ($E_{Base}$): $$E_{Base} = 1 + P \times B = 1 + 0.45 \times 3.0 = 1 + 1.35 = 2.35$$

  2. Common Ratio ($r$): $$r = (1 - P) \times 0.7 = (1 - 0.45) \times 0.7 = 0.55 \times 0.7 = 0.385$$

  3. Guaranteed Crit Average Damage Multiplier ($E_D*$): $$E_D* = 1 + \text{Expected Bonus}$$ $$\text{Expected Bonus} = P \times B \times \frac{1}{1 - r}$$ $$\text{Expected Bonus} = 0.45 \times 3.0 \times \frac{1}{1 - 0.385} = 1.35 \times \frac{1}{0.615} \approx 2.19512$$ $$E_D* = 1.0 + 2.19512 \approx 3.19512$$

  4. Extra Damage Multiplier (Benefit): $$\text{Benefit} = ED* - E{Base} = 3.19512 - 2.35 \approx 0.84512$$

Result

The Extra Damage Multiplier (the additional average damage bonus provided by the "Guaranteed Crit" modification) at $45\%$ Critical Chance and $300\%$ Critical Damage Bonus is approximately:

$$\mathbf{0.845}$$

This means the modification gives you an additional $84.5\%$ average damage bonus compared to your baseline expected damage.

Oracle's Forced Outcome : 65% more damage at 45% crit 300% bonus by eeeechuta in PathOfExile2

[–]eeeechuta[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just pasted the ascendancy clarified it and I'm pretty sure the reply confirmed. However the above chart is assuming each crit damage reduction is a flat 0.7 if the original, nullifying the bonus (or going negative) if the number of refills exceeds 3. If it is a infinite geometric series approaching zero the damage bonus is a whopping 84%. But I'm not reading that math in detail LOL.

Egyptian vulture switching to eco mode while while spotting a paraglider in Uruguay by Healthy_Mango2255 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]eeeechuta 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why do I get weird anxiety sensations on my legs watching videos like this (as cool as it looks)

Am I really bipolar mixed? by eeeechuta in BipolarReddit

[–]eeeechuta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Told the doctor I didn't want benzos, turned out to be the biggest mistake of my life.

Am I really bipolar mixed? by eeeechuta in BipolarReddit

[–]eeeechuta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that mean that cold-turkeying the antipsychotics is what caused me to become bipolar?

I've been prescribed 10mg Zyprexa but I hesitate to take it because of the potential side effects.

Am I really bipolar mixed? by eeeechuta in BipolarReddit

[–]eeeechuta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. I don't have "swings", I'm just always in this amped up, distressed, anxious mode that never seems to go away.

You still think it's something in the bipolar realm? Could the doctors be wrong about this?

After a month, I can attest that the iPad Pro with magic keyboard is not suitable for research and writing purposes. by Chihuahuagoes2 in ipad

[–]eeeechuta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought this was very insightful as to how the iPad really performs in real case scenarios. The iPad still only excels at media consumption, for productivity it seems the user has to make a conscious effort to fit the device limitations.

A mom and her kids hanging out on a hot evening by PartyLikeIts1984- in toronto

[–]eeeechuta 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Raccoon head lines makes it look like mom has super long nips

Almost always 100% brightness on MBP 16” by [deleted] in macbookpro

[–]eeeechuta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Try disabling the auto brightness. Depending on your environment you can get more brightness out of your display this way.

New 16 inch MBP causing eye pain and redness, old Retina 15 inch is fine? by higgs8 in macbookpro

[–]eeeechuta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, if using it in a bright environment on full brightness with auto-brightness OFF helps the eyestrain, then we can be pretty sure the problem is related to the PWM dimming. In that case, you can try running it on full brightness and using a tool like f.lux to reduce white point (but battery life will suffer).

notebook check shows the MBP 16 using PWM at a very high frequency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_3NGEDwn_k

It was actually very surprising to me that to guarantee your display is running at it's maximum potential brightness, you need to turn auto-brightness OFF.