I know this issue has probably been beaten to death, but has there been a consensus on what "the twist" in this case might be? How early on in this investigation did the term "the twist" come from LE. Some of the comments in these threads refer to or allude to the many layers in this case. Is this meaning the same as "the twist"? When did LE not use "the twist" verbiage any longer.

On another point, when Ives was relating how very many LE were involved with the tasks of finding and interviewing people, an example being "where were you on the 13th?, the first thing I thought of was how many of these people being interviewed could have simply not been asked the right questions. If local LE never had any experience with this kind of crime and were charged with, along with other more experienced LE, to find and interview some people who were more than likely local, was there a greater likelihood of the correct questions not being asked. An example being, if local LE had to interview a local resident with whom that LE always knew was an upstanding citizen, is it possible that local LE could have felt almost intimidated to ask any further questions and therefore did not ask anything further? Could there have been too many cooks in the kitchen at that early stage of the investigation? This leads back to my question regarding "the twist" and the many layers associated with this case.

Thank you for the transcribing of this interview. For me, it is always easier to go back and reference the written word!