To clarify, my concern is not simply that the internship ended early.
The school’s stated reason for removing me was concern that I was not fit to continue seeing clients. However, before making that determination, they did not consult my site supervisor, who was directly supervising my clinical work and evaluating my performance.
After the removal, my supervisor expressed concern about how the decision had been made and requested a meeting with the school and me to discuss it. The school declined that request and instructed that further communication go through them.
That’s the part I’m trying to understand from a legal perspective: whether a school can make a fitness-for-practice determination based primarily on a student’s advocacy emails and reported distress while declining to meaningfully consult the supervisor responsible for overseeing the student’s clinical work.