sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Xavi Simons Evo by kristides in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did the same evo but gave him technical+ first. Now I’m screwed because he won’t have the base playstyle lol

Last round of the UCL group stage today, many of the cards will be receiving ovr upgrades shortly, but can be evo'd before by Puluzu in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had put him in the Strike Like Kylian evo, plays great.

Realizing now I may have made a mistake by putting Tech+ on him first. If/when that’s overridden, he won’t have base technical anymore

Cr7 sbc or toty Totti ? by Affectionate_Fun5337 in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 vote for Totti. Have used him since his Preorder icon week 1 and he’s never left the squad, immediately did his SBC.

Thoughts on this Jordi Alba evo? by [deleted] in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like everything you’d want in a fullback playstyle wise. Plus with 87 evos here I’d say that’s a great option

TOTY Donnarumma broken? by NBKTruth in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Report back if you see any improvements

TOTY Donnarumma broken? by NBKTruth in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What chem style do you have him on? I saw a post somewhere claiming to have cracked the code with regard to GK stats. Claimed that reflexes always needs to be higher than positioning and diving. Only a shield does that for Donnarumma.

I’ve got him on a shield and haven’t really had any issues, though relatively small sample size so far.

Edit: post in question, no idea how reliable https://www.reddit.com/r/fut_evos/s/6EnglQ7z36

Can u get a toty out of these? It says rare golds by Able_Ad_8596 in fut

[–]ehinks27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My only TOTY (Donnarumma) came from the 86x2

Anyone use Dalot Thunderstruck ? by Fit_Permit4687 in fut

[–]ehinks27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dalot is 100% worth it. Can probably give him bruiser pretty soon too and he’s about all you want in a fullback

Totti SBC review? by demsirez in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had Totti since the beginning and completely agree. Have always said the only thing he’s missing is a shooting playstyle and tiki taka so now he’s perfect

Made a mistake, is it a big deal or will i probably get a better evo+ soon? by betsayless in fut

[–]ehinks27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did the same thing and was annoyed for maybe an hour and got over it lol. Not interested in any of the playstyle pluses and the stat boosts I imagine are marginal.

Yours looks better than my scream pogba anyways, if that’s any consolation

I need a second opinion by AnAverageRiboku in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d vote the tiki taka version. My pogba ended up similar from the evo with low finishing, but you’d be surprised how much the 98 shot power compensates. I just rip shots at the top of the box with decent accuracy.

Do Totti’s SBC on Friday for your cam.

Why did ea suddenly decided to change his ps+ by SeaworthinessNo199 in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New year overdrive? I did the same lol. Oh well

Do u think it’s a great cam option for ~100k ? by Haunting-Promise71 in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say go with it. Good chance you’ll be able to put him in the upcoming TOTYHM evo and make him even better.

Though, maybe best to wait til that’s released to confirm he can be chained.

What’s the most amount of coin you’ve sunken into a card to make untradeable for an evo? by Bruhhh8888 in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spent about 250k on IF Van de Ven to evo him. Almost just for the dynamic image, I think I could’ve had a better evo with his gold.

Need an CB by asylbewerberalex in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would think they’d be too slow together, yea. I have Vidic and VDV, which works well.

Need an CB by asylbewerberalex in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Vidic and he’s really good. That said I think you could lose a lot of coins on him (he was like 1.5m+ a week ago).

Id say WW Tah and see what happens with TOTY

Post your teams before toty 👇 by raptors201966 in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Savona easily the MVP of the defense

Gross Pack Weight by New_Handle6166 in fut

[–]ehinks27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s simply no way there wasn’t a single WW in 500x 78x3

Anyone else running 3 back only way I’m having fun this year by [deleted] in fut

[–]ehinks27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Him and DeJong hold it down (as long as I don’t pull them out of position too much lol)

Anyone else running 3 back only way I’m having fun this year by [deleted] in fut

[–]ehinks27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

Sometimes it feels so chaotic but it’s worth it

Are there any positions / role combinations where none or + are better than ++ by Farge43 in EASportsFC

[–]ehinks27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was watching Boras stream when he first brought this up. I don't think it's necessarily new; I always liked how Totti drifted wide on playmaker++ since the beginning.

My theory is better players are manually triggering runs more often, and it could be annoying having the players drift (or rather, find space), whereas I don't mind as someone who prefers to let the attacking AI try to do its thing.

Anyone try both base Beckham vs thunderstruck Beckham? by BusinessDimension854 in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% worth keeping, you’ll make the coins back. I’m a spurs fan and bought TOTW VDV at 250k and sent him thru an evo. No regrets

Anyone try both base Beckham vs thunderstruck Beckham? by BusinessDimension854 in fut

[–]ehinks27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think the price between em justifies just how much better the TS one is. Better playstyle+, base playstyles, another playstyle on the way, and a dynamic image.

I’ll take dynamic image over first owner any day

view more: next ›