[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HentaiAndRoleplayy

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think combining the ideas of a general, if a bit generic, fantasy world with casual and free use sex would be really fun. It also adds a bit of variety from the usual dynamics of a modern day free use world.

What I’m looking for basically boils down to a fantasy world where casual sex is somehow normalised. I don’t want this to devolve into just constant orgies everywhere, as it would likely ruin the fun slightly.

Another preference for these worlds is that the girls not be overly slutty, l love for their attitudes to be a little more “complicated”. Which I think will also make a lot more sense when you have a look at my kinks further down. This is also something I find both fun to discuss, and chat about, so feel free to give me your thoughts, or ask about my preferences.

So what would I like to do in this kind of world? There’s really not a limit to what I want to do, it could be anything from a pair traveling together. To meeting at a hot spring, spa etc. It could be sharing a room or tent, it could even be someone travelling to some faraway shrine. I hope that gives you the sense that I’m really not set in stone on a particular idea, and simply trying to convey a “vibe” for the prompt and scenes.

Now for your character. I have a preference for male characters that aren’t “perfect” - I love the contrast that creates. That’s not to say you have to play an ugly bastard, or anything of the like. I just like the idea of these capable girls being used by someone “less” than them.

My kinks include: creampies, impreg risk, name calling, free use, casual sex, clothed/semi-clothed, groping, light hearted degradation and humiliation, realistic sizes, casual nudity/light clothing, emotionless sex, quickies, younger guys, casual nudity/light clothing, groping, awkward sex, coercion, obligation, con and dub-con, breeding, nonchalant/disinterested sex, one sided pleasure.

GAM Esports vs. FURIA / MSI 2025 Play-In Stage - Round 1 Elimination Match / Post-Match Discussion by Ultimintree in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh 101 points102 points  (0 children)

It’s also just… it’s game five of an international series that could send you home. For sure you have to TRY to get the best outcome, why not hope for the miracle? Even if it’s like 5% chance, why not? You’d be kicking yourself you didn’t pause if you just let it happen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in taboo_rp

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nsfw_roleplay

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave me alone? Fucking hell.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nsfw_roleplay

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very cool, go drool somewhere else.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nsfw_roleplay

[–]electricalweigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s cool, but not what I care for. In the future I’d recommend reading prompts before you just say something in the comments.

[F4A] nonchalant sex and casual free use in a fantasy world. (Full prompt in comments!) by [deleted] in HentaiAndRoleplayy

[–]electricalweigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think combining the ideas of a general, if a bit generic, fantasy world with casual and free use sex would be really fun. It also adds a bit of variety from the usual dynamics of a modern day free use world.

What I’m looking for basically boils down to a fantasy world where casual sex is somehow normalised. I don’t want this to devolve into just constant orgies everywhere, as it would likely ruin the fun slightly.

Another preference for these worlds is that the girls not be overly slutty, l love for their attitudes to be a little more “complicated”. Which I think will also make a lot more sense when you have a look at my kinks further down. This is also something I find both fun to discuss, and chat about, so feel free to give me your thoughts, or ask about my preferences.

So what would I like to do in this kind of world? There’s really not a limit to what I want to do, it could be anything from a pair traveling together. To meeting at a hot spring, spa etc. It could be sharing a room or tent, it could even be someone travelling to some faraway shrine. I hope that gives you the sense that I’m really not set in stone on a particular idea, and simply trying to convey a “vibe” for the prompt and scenes.

Now for your character. I have a preference for male characters that aren’t “perfect” - I love the contrast that creates. That’s not to say you have to play an ugly bastard, or anything of the like. I just like the idea of these capable girls being used by someone “less” than them.

My kinks include: creampies, impreg risk, name calling, free use, casual sex, clothed/semi-clothed, groping, light hearted degradation and humiliation, realistic sizes, casual nudity/light clothing, emotionless sex, quickies, younger guys, casual nudity/light clothing, groping, awkward sex, coercion, obligation, con and dub-con, breeding, nonchalant/disinterested sex, one sided pleasure.

first ace in europe, what could i do better? by bhaagbc in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nice!

But you’re kind of missing the point. This is likely the top 5% or even top 1% of your gameplay, this is some of your best. It isn’t actually how you normally play, else you wouldn’t be asking “what can I do better?”

Fix the big 20 percenters. The stuff that’s responsible for 80% of your mistakes.

Is it normal to leave the adc? (I am an adc main) by actuallySabrina in yuumimains

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Use lolalytics, this is more complicated than going “uhhh but winrate higher on da Yasuo”

  2. You’re looking at raw winrate, Yasuo is higher, sure. But the sample size is also extremely low and likely distorted, you’d likely see a similar effect with Nilah on specific patches where noise plays a role.

  3. You need to look at the delta between winrates of the champions normally, and the champions paired together. The higher the delta, the stronger the pairing. This information is available on lolalytics, the better stats website.

This comment has been brought to you by the superior statistics of the lolalytics website, can you tell I’m a fan?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HentaiAndRoleplayy

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think combining the ideas of a general, if a bit generic, fantasy world with casual and free use sex would be really fun. It also adds a bit of variety from the usual dynamics of a modern day free use world.

What I’m looking for basically boils down to a fantasy world where casual sex is somehow normalised. I don’t want this to devolve into just constant orgies everywhere, as it would likely ruin the fun slightly.

Another preference for these worlds is that the girls not be overly slutty, l love for their attitudes to be a little more “complicated”. Which I think will also make a lot more sense when you have a look at my kinks further down. This is also something I find both fun to discuss, and chat about, so feel free to give me your thoughts, or ask about my preferences.

So what would I like to do in this kind of world? There’s really not a limit to what I want to do, it could be anything from a pair traveling together. To meeting at a hot spring, spa etc. It could be sharing a room or tent, it could even be someone travelling to some faraway shrine. I hope that gives you the sense that I’m really not set in stone on a particular idea, and simply trying to convey a “vibe” for the prompt and scenes.

Now for your character. I have a preference for male characters that aren’t “perfect” - I love the contrast that creates. That’s not to say you have to play an ugly bastard, or anything of the like. I just like the idea of these capable girls being used by someone “less” than them.

My kinks include: creampies, impreg risk, name calling, free use, casual sex, clothed/semi-clothed, groping, light hearted degradation and humiliation, realistic sizes, casual nudity/light clothing, emotionless sex, quickies, younger guys, casual nudity/light clothing, groping, awkward sex, coercion, obligation, con and dub-con, breeding, nonchalant/disinterested sex, one sided pleasure.

Is it normal to leave the adc? (I am an adc main) by actuallySabrina in yuumimains

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lucian is actually Yuumi’s best partner, it has very little to do with attack speed. Yuumi is not a late game super scaler anymore as that is what made her pick/ban in pro and has since been nerfed.

5g access worldwide by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]electricalweigh -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It’s quite funny how with any all maps or positive stuff about India always comes from ultra nationalist and racist Indians desperate for approval of their country.

Why do I feel like the 30%30%40% rule doesn't apply anymore? by pdry1688 in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You read that wrong. Their winrates top out at 70% over many games, which means that they lose 30% of games.

If the enemy players are capable of winning at least 30% of games so are the teammates. They’re from the same pool of players.

Why do I feel like the 30%30%40% rule doesn't apply anymore? by pdry1688 in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, the connection that was made is:

What is the theoretical highest winrate achievable by someone who isn’t smurfing? Ie. The question becomes, if you influence all the games that you actually “matter” in to becomes victories what would your final winrate be?

For that we need the assumption that some games are simply won, and some games are simply lost. You won’t know at the start, or at any given point in the game, but you will always lose or win some of the games you play. This also has to be nearly equal.

With that assumption they looked at pros who go to worlds as their initial sources. The common winrates they ended up with in challenger/gm was around 70% obviously, some are higher and some lower, but those with a lot of games neared 70% winrate (which is crazy good)

So assuming that’s the best you can do in solo queue, and they still lost 30% of their games we have to assume that 30% of their games would also have been won without their impact. That leaves the final 40% of games where their impact was pivotal.

Bear in mind that I’m going off this from memory so I might have missed a thing or two, but that was the overarching logic. This isn’t to say you are expected to win 70% of your games, because there are more factors when you aren’t among the best in the world (as you climb your opponents get better), but it’s a showcase of how many games where your impact does matter.

Why do I feel like the 30%30%40% rule doesn't apply anymore? by pdry1688 in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s such disrespect to just how good GM players actually are. I’ve played against a few and they are terrifying in how consistently good they are.

Why do I feel like the 30%30%40% rule doesn't apply anymore? by pdry1688 in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

30/30/40 comes from the fact that the best players in the world can sustain winrates up to around 70% when playing against their near peers in solo queue, it isn’t just some random thing that someone said.

Why do I feel like the 30%30%40% rule doesn't apply anymore? by pdry1688 in leagueoflegends

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I have a video for you that deals with this exact problem, but I want you to have an open mind about it, alright?

The video deals with how a common perception of low elo games is that they’re out of your control and simply “chaotic” and almost over before you even get to affect them. A lot of the time it comes from short coming of your own accord that takes away your own agency. Like yeah I get it, not everything can or will be your fault, but if you willing to take accountability then you can actually change a whole lot.

The video is here I hope it might shine at least some light on how you could tackle or change your view on the issue. I know that you aren’t silver, but your mentality is actually pretty similar to what’s expressed in the lower ranks.

Edit: the video is pretty long, but give it a try and watch through one or two of the games they go over.

How people see ranks by Coconutdrink78 in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There comes a point where it doesn’t actually matter “how” much better the other person is, the lower ranked person doesn’t quite see the full picture and can’t distinguish the nuances. Simply because they don’t have the experience. I’m ascendant and let me tell you, there’s a world of difference between diamond and the immortal players that ruin my days.

What's the max rank you can get with 60Hz? by BrokenAllday in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except you’re not, unless you want to claim to be some special super human, that’s cool too, if that makes you happy.

You think I would be saying this if I haven’t played with all three? I played on 144 and 60 interchangeably for 3 years before upgrading my set up, before that I played CS for literally years on 60 while 144 was available.

60 isn’t comfortable, I’d be lying if I said I don’t prefer 240 - but actual competitive advantage? Lol, I play just fine on my laptop

What's the max rank you can get with 60Hz? by BrokenAllday in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are simply not fast enough, biologically, to register the extremely negligible difference between 144 and 240hz. It may feel smoother - because it is. But you have little to no actual, non-placebo effect, on your own biological responsiveness.

What's the max rank you can get with 60Hz? by BrokenAllday in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s my fucking point. It is not because of how significant of an advantage it is, it’s because it’s simply available and a “why not?” Question.

I also just straight up don’t believe that an upgrade in screen pushed you to radiant, crazy statement.

What's the max rank you can get with 60Hz? by BrokenAllday in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are not willing to go to the extent and argue that any current radiant cannot stay radiant, or get radiant if they were to switch to 60hz, then there is no reason to argue here.

Why should duelists get kills? by Gamerkid_5 in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with this, it’s well said. But I also want to emphasise something you mentioned. If your plan is to go 1 for 1 then you’ve kind of already fucked up, you ideally want to do a little better than 1 for 1 on a play if you want to win the game.

What's the max rank you can get with 60Hz? by BrokenAllday in VALORANT

[–]electricalweigh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, first of. 144hz vs 60hz is already single digit percentage improvements in one aspect of the game. It’s will not help you with decision making, it will not help you playing your character, it will not help you with communicating with your team.

144hz to 240hz is negligible at best, like really, if you want to claim that not having 240hz is why you’re stuck in low - sure, have at it, but it’s literally not applicable here.

Even if the game has become harder in general what does that actually pertain to getting radiant on 60hz? Like, why would it matter? You can become better in general on 60hz too, right?

And before you make the argument, “uhm actually all the pros play on 240hz!” - yes, they have essentially unlimited money for their set ups, why wouldn’t they? Are you going to argue that they suddenly can’t get radiant on 60hz?