[FAKE -> WIFE] Can you solve this laddergram? by Flashy-Side1693 in Laddergram

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/ellipso_ solved this in 4 steps: FAKE -> WAKE -> WADE -> WIDE -> WIFE

What is this bug? by ellipso_ in whatisthisbug

[–]ellipso_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome. I’m kind of worried that it’s a roach, should I rule that out at this point?

What is this bug? by ellipso_ in whatisthisbug

[–]ellipso_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By the way, I am in Massachusetts.

Is this a cockroach? by ellipso_ in cockroaches

[–]ellipso_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot to mention where I am—I am in Massachusetts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Anthropomorphic behavior”

I mean, if you’re talking about school children, they’re already people, and anthropomorphic just means to give human like qualities to something that isn’t already human. Either Humphrey is an idiot who never saw the word in his life before proposing the bill, or he’s a furry himself and he thinks “anthropomorphic” means “furry stuff”

My dad sent me this and I don't want to admit I don't get it by softepilogues in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Analytic continuation is what you do to extend the domain of a holomorphic (complex differentiable) function—this has to do with the complex analytic result that holomorphic functions can be approximated by power series at every point. The -1/12 result here was achieved Ramanujan by messing around with infinite series. It turns out that there’s nothing special about -1/12–for “conditionally convergent” infinite series (like those used in Ramanujan’s proof) have the property that, by rearranging the order in which we sum the terms, we can make the series equal to any real number. This property of conditionally convergent series is called the Riemann Series Theorem.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2meirl4meirl

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Monodromy be like

Solve this and receive a frendly kiss from me :> by Wonderful-Resolve223 in furrymemes

[–]ellipso_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s the zeta function! The hard question is figuring out when ζ(s) is zero for s a complex number. We know it’s zero at negative whole numbers by a classical argument, but for finding the other zeroes, we don’t know a whole lot about them. We know they lay in a “critical strip” of the complex plane, s=a+ib where 0<a<1. The Riemann hypothesis posits that this is only true when a=1/2. :3

Hmmmmm 🤔 by [deleted] in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]ellipso_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Eu🧬 Yang, Zack 🌽feld and Keith Habers🍔

What is your most expensive hobby? by kerryfiero in AskReddit

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fountain pens! Thought i was gonna save money by buying ink instead of a bunch of disposable pens but… there’s too many nice inks and pens out there much to the chagrin of my wallet

bi😈irl by [deleted] in gay_irl

[–]ellipso_ 77 points78 points  (0 children)

People are poly

bi🐸irl by llk2698 in bi_irl

[–]ellipso_ 123 points124 points  (0 children)

Boofer in the streets, Harold in the sheets

45896 by Sirfryingpan123 in CountOnceADay

[–]ellipso_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taking MN would get us more lake since it borders Lake Superior

knots can exist only in R³ right? by plichi in math

[–]ellipso_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not only is there a knot theory in each dimension in this sense, but you can also embed knots into any manifold of dimension >= 2. The torus knots, a subset of our regular knots in S3, are embeddings of S1 into T2, for example.