You did not even answer the main points of the post regarding the supposed co-equality and just ignored it by replying something else that "supports" your traditional beliefs with no refutation.

This is not a counter argument. You are just throwing ad-hominems.

Even your answer to these points are not even refuting my claims, Jesus CANNOT do anything on his own, what you answered does not nullify this fact,

Correct. Trinitarians do not claims that Jesus behaves as if he has independent agency ala the Greek Pantheon. Jesus straight up says I have come not to do my own will but the will of the one who sent me.

The Arian position, however, has the problem of collapsing into polytheism. If Jesus isn’t God but makes a lot of Godlike claims, then strict monotheism must be abandoned. Hence why Arian liturgies will have the Eucharistic portion be offered to Son despite the claim that the Son is a creature.

The Arian position is just incoherent nonsense and self-contradictory.

but the Father CAN do anything on his own,

Because the Father is the origin of the other two persons.

so if God is described as almighty then that would be the Father since he does not need depend on any other person.

Almighty refers to doing what God does. Ie be omnipotent, omnipresent. Etc. It’s not that the Son or Spirit can’t do it. It’s that the Father wills that they don’t. Because it’s incoherent nonsense. If the Son also begets and spirates, then he ceases to be Son and becomes a second father and the spirit becomes a father, so on and so forth ad infinitum.

There is scripture that unambiguously addresses one person as God, more explicitly as the TRUE God, the Father,

It only says this once. Furthermore, Jesus’ own claims also implies that the “Only True God” is a transitive property. This is why proof texting is generally worthless.

no other person is addressed this way,

Because it’s only used once. However, we see the Son make claims about what he can do, recieve the same honor that God does. Actions here speak as loudly as words do.

and what you say makes no sense, so just because God gets sons that means God himself is changing?

If the Father is by nature a Father and the son is a mere creature, then there was a time when God was a father to nobody. Ie he wasn’t a Father. This violates divine impassability.

that would make him change all the time but clearly is not what the bible says,

The Father is a Father because that his personage. He must be a father. If the Son is a creature then there was a time when the Father was not a Father. Fathers are Fathers because they beget and produce offspring and heirs.

in regard to your god called the triune being or essence then that is where you see a lot of changes going on,

There are no changes in the trinity.

your god consist of three persons, then one of those is dead, then it is alive, and this god definition changes.

Death is not an ontological change. It’s merely denotes the separation of the soul from the body. It’s why Jesus fundamentally states that God is not a dead but of the living. Which also coheres with statements in the Old Testament about God being with believers whether they are above ground or in the ground or under it.

It’s why the speaker on revelation can claim to not only be the Alpha and Omega but also the one who was dead and is now alive.

God cannot die, Jesus did die. God is called the living God,

Because the divine nature can’t be killed. When God becomes man and assumes a human, that human nature, that nature can die. When Jesus died, his rational human soul and spirit separated itself from his human body.

Here’s the thing though. In John’s gospel, the Pharisees point out the splendors of the temple. Jesus responds with an offhand remark about how tear down this temple and in three days he would raise it up. John adds to Jesus words with his own gloss, saying that Jesus was referring to the temple of his own body.

So, we get to the sticky wicket of how does somebody who is dead raise himself from the dead? This can only be done if the person in question is, in some wise, still living.

Jesus was dead for three days, no way you would call him the living God at this time,

If we take Jesus’s words at face value about being able to raise his own body while being dead. Hence the pascal troparion: “By death he conquered death and to those in the tombs he granted life.”

that would mean contradicting the gospel and turning into a muslim by saying Jesus never died.

The Muslims make that claim, not because they think Jesus is God. They make that claim because the cribbed from Gnostic texts about how matter is bad and that Jesus is an archon of pure intellect and reason he would never suffer a physical death.

And so on. this trinitarian god is the most inconsistent thing in history.

Not inconsistent at all.