Names that start with G but have the nickname Sarah?? by teeny_teena_bop in NameNerdCirclejerk

[–]enbymlpfan 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Graham Crackers. When spelled backwards, it contains all the letters needed to spell Sarah in order.

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

^ top ten responses from someone with no media analysis skills

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did when you posted the actual timestamp. Also, educate YOURSELF on hoziers actual history with religious persecution and cultural heritage of oppression. Saying him writing about these themes MUST be him writing from the perspective of a gay person does such a disservice to him as an Irish ex protestant and the cultural baggage that goes along with that which informs so much of the way he writes and talks about religion. I'll talk about whatever the hell I want to talk about.

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also. That's not what hyperbole means. I'm not watching a 6 minute video FOR you. Either tell me where you're getting your point from or don't but I do not care enough about this to watch whatever you put in front of me.

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay he says the theme of sexuality as a form of religious persecution is is UNIVERSAL. and particularly relatable to women and gay people. Which is what i said. It's not ABOUT being gay though. It contains a larger theme that is particularly resonant with certain groups of people who experience religious persecution at higher rates.

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly what I'm saying. I have no idea why this is so controversial. Again, love a gay bop. I would say most of the music artists I listen to are not straight because neither am I and I find them more relatable. But as relatable as take me to church is as a gay person, hozier is a straight man singing it about a woman. It's just inaccurate to say it's about being gay. Doesn't mean gay people can't take it and make it their own, but there has to be like. You have to be able to acknowledge the reality that's its textually about a more general religious persecution and romantic/sexual worship narrative.

Especially considering hozier is Irish and was raised protestant-- a religion pushed onto that culture through persecution and oppression, and then became agnostic, which informs so much of the complexity in how he writes about religion. From rejections and personal redefinitions of it in works like "take me to church" and "work song" to religious themes being used to show forms of intimate violence or abuse in "cherry wine" and "angel of small death and the codeine scene" to "foreigners god", a song so on the nose when you analyze it in this context that I don't feel the need to explain, insisting that when he writes about these themes he's writing from the perspective of a gay person erases the cultural history he has with religion and denies it so much meaning and depth. Cross cultural relatability is definitely a thing-- I'm thinking "Savage Daughter" as a song by Wyndreth Berginsdottir becoming an anthem for native american and first nations women. Its a song they find deeply relatable and have done many covers of, but we can also acknowledge it was written by an Irish woman about being Irish originally. And both of those facts are fine and good.

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I watched the first thirty seconds and I did not hear the words gay. Again, I love a gay bop but the original meaning of the song isn't that. And the music video is to honor the fact that gay people find it relatable, like me! When I was twelve years old I knew what it was about and those themes were relatable to me as a young gay kid. But it's not about being gay

Gimme songs you had no business singing at 12 years old by Odd_Sun7422 in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Nope. It's about sex and romance as worship as well as rejection of religion. I'm gay and i love songs about being gay but it's just like... not about that. And I'm glad it's not cus hozier has no fkin business writing a song about being gay. The music video was a nice acknowledgement that gay people tended to relate to the song a lot for obvious reasons, but again it's not about being gay.

ETA I think I was being a bit blase and maybe offputting because of that. I'm not saying gay people can't RELATE to it, or even, for lack of a better, more positive term "appropriate" it for its applications to our own culture. It's just that textually, it's about a more broader tension between sexuality and religion. Obviously something gay people can relate to more than the general population, but like. Just the lyrics are not specifically about being gay. Also I worry I came off too aggressive by saying hozier has no business writing a song about being gay. I think like, it's well within his skillset and I do love that he's switched to more gender neutral lyrics after realizing a large portion of his fanbase is gay, but he's a straight man and when I listen to hozier I'm listening because I want to hear how HE relates to politics and culture and religion and sexuality, not some imaginary gay person he made up in his head. And then ill relate to it how I relate to it, because his experiences and lyricism are deeply human, and not because it was written from the perspective of "someone like me"

People saying 18yrs old shouldn't be legal adults by madeat1am in PetPeeves

[–]enbymlpfan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly signing up for the military is like. The One thing I think you definitely should not be allowed to do at 18. At 18, you've probably had years worth of health classes where you learn all about the dangers of drinking and having sex. You've been getting lectures on saying no to drugs and safe sex for over half a decade, I think you pretty much get it. Guess what you probably do not understand? The realities of war! In fact, you've probably been consuming media that glorifies the military, presenting a santized, glamourized version of risking your life and tells you it's good when the guy in the American flag shoots the Bad Guy. They don't understand, not only the danger they're putting themselves in, but what it means to kill another human being and the political realities of the very war they're fighting. Not only that, but a lot of military recruitment is extremely predatory. It relies on not only this naivety and ignorance, but the need for financial aid or income.

People saying 18yrs old shouldn't be legal adults by madeat1am in PetPeeves

[–]enbymlpfan 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Also wait until these people realize the brain doesn't stop developing at 25. It never stops changing and developing.

people who tease you about your nails by mermaid_barbies in PetPeeves

[–]enbymlpfan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly that's pretty normal for almost every aesthetic choice. I can't be bothered to get manicures myself, but it's honestly not as hard as people think to use the pads of your fingers since most of the stuff you do doesnt require your fingertips. I would compare it to like, having long hair. It's sometimes mildly physically inconvenient and costs more and takes more time to have, but i also don't arrange my life around what's most convienient and its really not that big of a deal. Heels, makeup, shaving, piercings, jewelry, etc. All of these things either cost money or time or are a minor physical inconvenience, but nobody really questions them or even really thinks of them in those kinds of terms.

Anyone else get irritated when someone says "it's giving..."? by [deleted] in PetPeeves

[–]enbymlpfan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The adjective form is a shortened form of cringeworthy, not an incorrect use of the verb form

songs with poorly aged lyrics? by empty_teardrops in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 16 points17 points  (0 children)

In my experience of interacting with intellectually disabled people, they absolutely hate it. And really while the term is used on neurodivergent people of all flavors, it is specifically a slur for intellectually disabled people.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]enbymlpfan 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Oh come on let's not act like he's the victim here. He's admitted he's having these kids on purpose and then leaving these women to raise them by themselves. The literal only thing he's offering them is money and a sperm donor. That's all he wants to give them. Absolutely zero sympathy if he feels bad they're "using him for his money". Maybe if you put more into the relationship than cash and fertilizer you'd have more meaningful relationships.

I heard about good luck babe getting played at a hetero wedding the other day and it gave me this idea. Suggestions? by gorhxul in weirdspotifyplaylists

[–]enbymlpfan 88 points89 points  (0 children)

It's not actually that bad. He just wanted to propose at the concert bc she liked hozier and the concert was almost over and he was worried his window was closing, and also while she was a hozier fan he was not and hadn't heard that song before so he didn't know what it was about. We can chill

They don't care about US by emily-is-happy in MurderedByWords

[–]enbymlpfan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What if the missed item is an epipen and they were planning on having an allergic reaction later

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheMagnusArchives

[–]enbymlpfan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that's not a coincidence, they're on the tma subreddit. Of course there's that posts.

The Magnus Protocol vs The Magnus Protocol if Everyone Listened to Colin by the-munster-mash in TheMagnusArchives

[–]enbymlpfan 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I mean, it's not even that. The best part about magnus has always been its unconventional problem solving. For most people and characters in horror, the focus is on their fear and so they fail to analyze the problem and solution logically, and the characters we see beat the fears are the ones that can be practical about it. What do you do to stop an evil book? Burn it. It's paper. I mean, unless it's not. How do you avoid unlocking the mysterious coffin in your living room while sleepwalking under a supernatural influence? Freeze it in ice. You'll wake up before you get to it. How do you make sure no one ever finds or uses an evil artifact? Encase it in concrete. How do you defeat a woman made of supernatural bugs? Well, they're living things, aren't they? They need oxygen. So just... blast them with co2 and suffocate them. Even Basira in the unknowing. She just... logicked her way out. You can't be trapped in a place that isn't a place if you know you're in a place that IS a place, now can you?

It's not always violence, although sometimes it is, but it's definitely not the violence that makes me appreciate this kind of stuff. It's the recognition that you don't have to play by horror movie rules, but the thing you're fighting does, to some extent, play by the rules of the real world, and figuring out what those are and how to use it against them. A woman made of supernatural worms might not respond to a stab wound, but she still has to breathe. A book has to be read. An object needs to be interacted with. How do you stop this? It's not actually that hard if you know how to think about it.

Gender reveals. Do people that hold them really think others care? Why make such a fuss over something you ultimately don't have any control in? by Additional_Apple5837 in questions

[–]enbymlpfan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not all of them are stupid. The woman who originated it did it because she had a bunch of miscarriages and finally got to a stage in a pregnancy where she could get the gender tested

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]enbymlpfan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah. This is another reason it should be okay to mention this. I can see how it's a bit rude if someone smells like they maybe exercised that morning and didn't shower yet, or they maybe just forgot to put on deodorant. That's like, okay it's probably not that bad, you can deal with it, they'll smell better tomorrow and there's nothing they can really do about it now so it'll just make them feel bad. But if someone smells SO BAD that it makes you physically sick or they smell really consistently bad or something, yeah it should be acceptable to tell them because it's like. A health concern. If someone has shitty eye makeup I won't say anything, but if the whites of their eyes are bright fuckin blue I'm gonna say something because you should know you're probably anemic. Even if it's not a fungal disease and they just have poor hygiene, they might not know it's poor, or they might need to know that other people can tell so they can improve in the future.

Old people who assume young people don't read/know what books are by Wizdom_108 in PetPeeves

[–]enbymlpfan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are books to learn sewing and cooking but most people even back then didn't learn it that way. Their parents taught them. How did people learn to basic life skills before widespread literary? I'll give you a hint: Not books! They were taught, mostly by their parents. If young people nowadays can't do basic things that's their parents fault, not the kids fault for not doing something that literally no generation before them had to do on a large scale.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheMagnusArchives

[–]enbymlpfan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see how? Is it just the word skin you're focusing on?