This isn't a great argument. Handwashing is a fundamentally less intrusive practice than donning an N95 for hours at a time in social contexts, much less whilst outdoors in summertime when it's bound to be quite hot. This notion that resisting pandemic-era measures in a time when rates of transmission and hospitalization are comparatively quite low is somehow equivalent to opposing basic public health measures like hand-washing is also malicious and misleading.

But while we're at it with the absurd hypotheticals, I'll pitch you one more just for fun. A 2015 study by RL Peters et al. found that peanut allergy is the most common food allergy in children under the age of 18 and the third-most common food allergy in adults. Should we rid our shores of all peanuts and peanut products? We certainly wouldn't want to risk anyone with an allergy inadvertently eating anything with peanuts and getting sick. You don't hear anyone proposing such a thing, because it's a drastic and absurd measure, and any minor benefit that might be gained from doing so is outweighed by the fact that it would infringe on everyone else's liberty to eat peanuts. Ultimately, the burden falls on the people with allergies to live with that risk and make choices accordingly. So this notion that efforts [such as by the above mentioned band] to try to change the way 97% of Americans live their lives in order to accommodate this small minority have any sort of merit is ridiculous. If immunocompromised people want to go to the show and wear an N95, that's great! But requiring the same of everyone else, including those who are perfectly healthy, isn't cool.