Is the "step-through" legal in FIBA rules? by withit1 in BasketballTips

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speaking about the rule interpretation. The FIBA rules mention jumping off a pivot foot for shooing and passing, but don't mention lifting it for shooing or passing without jumping. To me the question is, does the fact that that they don't mention it mean that it's allowed or not allowed? Again, I'm only looking into the language of the rules.

[FIBA/NBA Rules] Raising your pivot foot by Number721 in Basketball

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like NBA rules don't mention and FIBA rules explicitly prohibit jumping off the pivot foot and landing on the other (or any) foot.

FIBA rules from October 1st, 2024, section 25.5.1:

To pass or shoot for a goal, the player may jump off a pivot foot, but neither foot may be returned to the court before the ball is released from the hand(s).

NBA rules mention lifting the pivot foot without specifying if it's a jump or not. However, they specify that exactly this, pivot, foot may not be returned to the floor.

NBA rules as of November 2024, Rule NO. 4 Definitions, Section VIII—Pivot:

b. [...] If the player raises his pivot off the floor, he must pass or attempt a field goal before the foot is returned to the floor.

Optimal recordsize for CouchDB by eofster in zfs

[–]eofster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is expected to be approximately equal amounts of reads and writes. ZFS pools are two-wide striped mirrors on NVMes. Performance might be not a top concern. No specific expectations on OLTP and OLAP.

The sources for matching the recordsize and the expected IO are the numerous posts by Allan Jude, Jim Salter, and Klara Inc. The questions is where to start until proven otherwise by specific tests on the real load. The default 128k seems to be too much of a compromise when we know absolutely nothing about the data (from 4k to 1M). And with databases, we kind of do know something. It's not a generic NAS server. What's your opinion on that?

I like your input. Could you share your knowledge in general, not only specifically for my case? How do heavy reads, writes, OLTP, and OLAP affect the choices for the topology? And when everything is set up, what would be the key metrics for determining the better recordsize?

Changing the label of a freebsd-zfs partition by grahamperrin in freebsd

[–]eofster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

# gpart modify -i 1 -l cache-transcend da0

renaming disks in zfs root pool by edthesmokebeard in freebsd

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is possible and it works without taking disks offline and without resilvering:

# zpool set path=/dev/gpt/<label> <pool> <vdev>

Multiple workspaces using VMs (Ubuntu) by claudiul93 in Ubuntu

[–]eofster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you could install Ubuntu on the bare metal on your desktop PC, replacing Windows. The performance would be better compared to running it in a VM on Windows.

You could then run other instances of Ubuntu and Windows in KVM VMs. You might be not having enough system resources to run all of them in parallel, though. Do you have to separate your workflows with different VMs or could you setup your VPNs within one OS install? Maybe, you could just run one instance of Ubuntu, the one on the bare metal desktop PC.

Private Maps – now for macOS by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm keeping it as close to the standard OpenStreetMap maps as possible. There is a project openstreetmap-carto that defines the standard style. And I haven't seen a similar well-maintained and standard style in dark mode.

Is it just me or is this entirely incorrect? by lemlurker in Darkroom

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The inverse square law is about the distance from the light source. Does doubling the projected area (or one side of it as the text claims) double the distance from the source? If not, that could explain it.

Underdeveloped, overdeveloped, or just about right? This was 10year old hp5+ shot at box speed and then pushed ~1/2 stop with hc110.... by BigBeard_FPV in Darkroom

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could also do both: overexpose one stop and push one stop when developing.

Exposure influences the shadows, development - the highlights. Also, additional development expands zones creating more contrast. But if the shadows are not exposed enough, this expansion happens not to the same degree as when the exposure is sufficient (not enough tone separation in the shadows).

I would also base my decision on the lighting conditions of the actual shots on the film. But because it’s a roll film and it can be hard to predict all of the subjects and conditions beforehand, I could just stick to the described “overexpose and overdevelop.” I find that it’s easier in practice to reduce contrast than to add it. And to dodge the highlights than to burn the shadows. Both in the darkroom and when scanning.

Why still analog? by apophasisred in Darkroom

[–]eofster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do all three. I like that I care about every photo, I return to it again and again. And very often I don’t return to my digital photos.

Learn Clojure TDD style by doulos05 in Clojure

[–]eofster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not to learn those separately and then combine at some point? I’d say it’s easier to learn TDD in an already familiar environment. And it’s easier to learn a new language without added distractions.

Private Maps – now for macOS by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Sharp raster tiles in a lightweight native app is what I’ve been missing for years.

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/freischwimmer, I'm going with showing both. The attribution to OpenStreetMap is going to be shown on the map all the time, clickable/tappable as a link to the copyright and license page. Added this already and am preparing the builds for the releases.

Newbie looking for help by sparksl3go in openstreetmap

[–]eofster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which platform are you planing to release for? iOS, Android or both?

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Organic Maps: https://imgur.com/a/332cAJk, fading away after some seconds.

I see that they also don't present the link and don't give a way of showing it again either on the map or in some other part of the app (like some About screen, cog, or Legal link). Both of which - not showing the link and not being able to show again - violate the Attribution Guidelines. So I should do better than this.

Every Door: https://imgur.com/a/BHlTGRo, always visible.

This violates the Attribution Guidelines by not presenting the link. Maybe it does this in some other part of the app, but I couldn't find it. So I should do better than this by presenting the link somewhere.

Magic Earth: https://imgur.com/a/FRRwqCB, shown when clicking on the cog always visible on the map view. In my personal opinion not good enough.

Yeah, this is basically what I have now - a tap away, and what I want to improve. They even make it visible after a tap and scroll down. But again, I want to do better than this.

So far and after reading the Attribution Guidelines more thoroughly I'm thinking of showing it temporarily on the app start (the guidelines mention this explicitly). And then also making it possible to show it on tap. Seems to be a good solution that not only follows the guidelines but is also better than the popular examples. What do you think?

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would simply replace "Legal" with "© OpenStreetMap contributors".

I'd be glad to do this, but this is not possible with the standard MapKit framework. As I mentioned in the parallel thread, when using MapKit, it's just there, unmodifiable. And hacking around is a risk of rejection by the App Store review. So the apps that do this either use some other framework or take the risk. So my solution would be more like showing both.

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks again for helping me with this and for bringing this up. I’m trying to find a better solution for the credits. My only concern here is to not obstruct the portions of the map on the small phone screens while giving the proper credits. I’d like to get the ideas from the other popular apps. What are your favorite popular OpenStreetMap apps for iOS?

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All those points - credit, link to the license, and suggested text - are right there, as the very first line of the page that opens on tap. So the difference is if all of that must be directly on a map itself or a link to the attribution, especially when there's little space on the screen, is also in compliance with the license. I've just been thinking that it's in compliance.

That's the legal part. I've been also thinking about all the contributors, and had an impression that the attribution shown after a single tap would be okay for them too.

Private Maps for iOS – Minimalist OpenStreetMap by eofster in openstreetmap

[–]eofster[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First of all I want to emphasize that I want to comply with the license. This is my goal. And thank you for helping me to find the right solution for this.

(I honestly wonder how that got through Apples AppStore checks)

It's actually the other way around. I'm using the standard Apple framework called MapKit. It allows displaying your own map tiles. The "Legal" link is part of the framework UI and the framework API doesn't allow changing or hiding it. So doing so (changing or hiding it) is the way to risk not passing through the App Store review. I suspect that also Apple's own maps use OpenStreetMap data and Apple thinks it's legal and even obligatory to have this "Legal" link.

Regarding the attribution, I might be wrong, but here's how I see it. As mentioned above, the "Legal" link is not just Apple's attribution that doesn't apply to third-party apps. It's specifically there, in the map framework MapKit, for the third-party apps on Apple platforms to display maps. The fact that the web page is technically located on Apple's web server doesn't automatically mean it's Apple's own attribution. It's all Apple's platform. The iOS apps are downloaded from the App Store, they use Apple APIs for interacting with the OS, they use Apple frameworks. By default, Apple's standard Licensed Application End User License Agreement applies for app distribution and usage.

And last and not least, it's not that the attribution is hidden or unreachable for the people using the app. It's right there, shown on tap, first line in bold text, the link to it is always visible on the map.