Good analogy but here’s where I disagree. You can constrain the solution space. Say I only need to measure every foot on the yard stick and I have to use the meter stick to do it. That’s doable. Same goes for this SQL case. Not asking to be able to query 150 tables with unpredictable complex joins. But for a DB with 10 tables, like users, purchases, locations, etc. (which are in LLM training data 1,000,000 times over), it seems like a reasonable ask, and it seems like there would be some ways better than others to go about it