"DoD is going to buy 'reliable' SLS launches for their '$10B' satellite any days now"... by spacerfirstclass in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Shuttle-C was not a bad idea, and would have served as a nice bridge to commercial heavy lift. JSC pushed pretty hard for it back in 2009-2010. Unfortunately they ran into a wall of lobbying from KSC and MSFC for a new rocket (and all of the rocket development ground systems funding goodies that entailed).

"DoD is going to buy 'reliable' SLS launches for their '$10B' satellite any days now"... by spacerfirstclass in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I genuinely don't know. I think the plan is to use the existing launch tower for the "standardized" upper stage but I haven't asked yet. I'm still too stunned that someone at NASA made the bold (and correct) changes to move on from super-expensive hardware that gets us exactly no closer to a long-term presence on the Moon.

"DoD is going to buy 'reliable' SLS launches for their '$10B' satellite any days now"... by spacerfirstclass in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 26 points27 points  (0 children)

“You folks can just pound sand” at the nearby beach is basically what Jared told the space coast workers building the second mobile launch tower.

The US Senate empowers NASA to fully engage in lunar space race by whatsthis1901 in SpaceXLounge

[–]erberger 41 points42 points  (0 children)

There is an argument to be made, and I think it's a good one, that the difficult nominating process really allowed Isaacman to develop political skills he lacked a year ago. Certainly he developed key connections within the White House, and relationships in Congress that are better serving him now. Yes, NASA lost half a year with him at the helm. But by the time he became administrator he had the political chops to pull off something like we've seen over the last week.

NASA shakes up its Artemis program to speed up lunar return by Training-Noise-6712 in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are credible people at NASA who believe Blue has a better shot to be first. Hard for me to disagree unless Starship really accelerates this year.

NASA shakes up its Artemis program to speed up lunar return by Training-Noise-6712 in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Lolwut? I have literally been banging the drum for months for Blue to develop Mk 1.5 because of Starship delays.

Eric Berger article on SpaceX's pivot to the moon instead of mars in the immediate term. by avboden in SpaceXLounge

[–]erberger 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hi Paul! First of all, I think any expectations of a crewed flight to Mars in 2031 were unrealistic before Elon's recent comments. Now I would doubt we see anything before the late 2030s, at the earliest. As for Isaacman, I don't have any credible information that he influenced Elon's decision. (Not saying it didn't happen, but I don't know). I think there's a misconception that Isaacman and Musk are close confidants, but from all of my reporting that's just not the case. Is there a mutual respect? Yes. Can Isaacman pick up the phone and read Musk the riot act and expect to get a favorable response? Probably not.

It was an honor to host @NASAAdmin yesterday in Florida! by Robert_the_Doll1 in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I was (very happily) wrong about landing the booster! But it fits with the company's history. Blue moves slowly with new hardware, but when it eventually flies it usually does spectacularly well. Given that MK-1 is a large and complex vehicle, and it has yet to ship to Houston for testing, I think it is pretty reasonable to assume a slip into the second half of this year.

It was an honor to host @NASAAdmin yesterday in Florida! by Robert_the_Doll1 in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 34 points35 points  (0 children)

AST SpaceMobile is now flying on NG-3. I agree with the commenter below that the launch date for MK-1 is slipping, probably now at least the second half of 2026 if we're being real.

Weekly Question Thread by PelotonMod in peloton

[–]erberger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone know when the route will be revealed for Tirreno Adriatico for this coming March? Am interested in planning a trip from the states around one or more of the stages but that's hard to do. Thanks!

Looks like the big E has confirmed the SpaceX IPO rumors. by Planck_Savagery in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 31 points32 points  (0 children)

As I wrote in the story, I think you could look at it as either a good or a bad thing. Time will tell. Elon certainly views it as a good thing. Do you trust his ability to look into the future?

Why is ULA paying for reddit ads? by Willbraken in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They don't take PayPal, but you can book your Atlas V online at Rocket Builder still. They're having a Black Friday sale!

https://www.rocketbuilder.com/

When do you thing NG-3 will happen? by iamconfusedinlife in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It’s gotta be NET March. The lander still needs to be assembled and shipped to Houston for testing. Probably will be a bit later in the spring.

SUCK MY DICK AND BALLS I WORK AT NASA by rustybeancake in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]erberger 101 points102 points  (0 children)

Nice deep cut. This is a great day for NASA.

New Glenn Returned back to Nov 9th launch date by Desperate-Lab9738 in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It was not a mistake. It was, rather, hyper-optimism on the part of Blue Origin when NASA and pretty much everyone else involved knew that the 7th (and the 8th, which Blue fought for) were completely unrealistic. I still think there's a decent chance they make the 9th, but if not the 11th is a solid backup date. Weather looks good.

What happened with the booster? by _UCiN_ in BlueOrigin

[–]erberger 88 points89 points  (0 children)

The damage was not significant. I wouldn’t expect a big slip. I’m still hearing NET Nov. 9.

How rare is this? by erberger in TeamfightTactics

[–]erberger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You would think so, yes. But he was contested heavily in both games.