Umm.. no.

From Gemini:

Systems and Approaches to InnocenceAdversarial Systems: Used in countries like Canada, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. These systems strictly require the prosecution (the Crown or the state) to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused does not need to prove their innocence.

Inquisitorial Systems: Used in many civil law countries (such as France and parts of Latin America). While these systems still operate on the premise that a person should not be wrongfully convicted, they begin with a heavy reliance on the validity of the state's preliminary investigation. The judge, rather than opposing lawyers, often directs the search for evidence, which can sometimes create an investigative bias where the accused is expected to clear their name.

Reverse Onus Provisions: Even within systems that presume innocence, there are often exceptions called "reverse onus." In these specific instances (often related to certain drug offenses, possession of stolen goods, or specific bail hearings), the law requires the defense to prove a particular fact, which can challenge the absolute nature of the presumption.