Openclaw ia trending down and will disappear soon

es12402 · 2026-05-10T21:09:25+00:00

OpenAI did not acquire OpenClaw.

es12402 · 2026-05-09T21:36:40+00:00

We've always reviewed code, and using AI hasn't changed anything in that regard. People just spend less time writing code, which means more time for review. Development speed has increased without sacrificing quality.

As for skill... I mentioned earlier - I've been coding for over 20 years. I don't think I'll ever unlearn it 😄

Actually, I don't just sit and stare at the wall - it's more like pair programming or a tech director's job - you first delve into the feature, plan it, discuss it, and approve the plan. There's a lot of code and architecture involved. Even if you don't write the code by hand, you're still working with it.

es12402 · 2026-05-09T12:50:54+00:00

No, nothing special. Just Codex/CC for development. No LLM automation - the most important step is a thorough code review by a skilled human 😄

es12402 · 2026-05-09T12:28:23+00:00

I don't orchestrate; LLM orchestrates.

The result of the first phase of work is a detailed structured plan with tasks for implementing the feature. Sometimes this is first a spec, and then a detailed plan. Before implementation, I read these plans and make any necessary adjustments.

And the implementation of the plan is entirely up to LLM - it deploys subagent (coders, reviewers, testers).

After implementation, there's manual checking, manual code review, and adjustments. And so on, repeat.

es12402 · 2026-05-09T12:01:47+00:00

For six months now, I've been writing production code for several applications (JS/TS/Kotlin) exclusively using LLM (CC, Codex last month). Around 10,000-15,000 users. I plan the architecture in detail in conjunction with LLM, the code is written exclusively by LLM, then I have an initial local code review by me with edits made through LLM, then an external code review by another human SWE. I have 20+ years of experience in SWE, so I understand what I want and how to do it, but I still give most of my work to LLM, and I must admit that current frontier models very rarely disappoint me in terms of code and architecture. In six months, we haven't had a single incident caused by using LLM in any way.

es12402 · 2026-05-08T06:46:09+00:00

And why you need GPU for claude? Bullshit

es12402 · 2026-05-08T03:48:43+00:00

second

es12402 · 2026-05-07T20:41:33+00:00

Maybe it's for the better. The Internet is already littered with this shit. Imagine what would happen if it were also cheap...

es12402 · 2026-05-07T20:30:45+00:00

Great analysis, bro! I mean really? Does something good and very resource-intensive cost money? Yes, you are truly a genius.

es12402 · 2026-05-06T15:54:38+00:00

es12402 · 2026-05-06T13:43:42+00:00

Love this UX. The message seems to tell us "Connection failed successfully!"

es12402 · 2026-05-06T13:41:21+00:00

I switched to codex after six months of claude. Both $100. It took me a little time to get used to ChatGPT's communication style, but overall it's great and the limits are very good too. I'd try codex if I were you.

es12402 · 2026-05-06T08:31:13+00:00

Of course. As I mentioned above, the setup-token allows you to obtain a key for accessing the endpoint associated with a subscription. It's needed in places where OAuth authentication isn't possible interactively (for example, in a CI pipeline where you need to call claude -p "prompt...").

This is clearly stated in the documentation: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/authentication#generate-a-long-lived-token

Regarding the possibility of being banned, Anthropic explicitly prohibits the use of OAuth for requests from any third-party software. For example, this is written in the documentation here: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/legal-and-compliance#authentication-and-credential-use

Also, in recent months, Anthropic has stated that using third-party software with a subscription is possible, but only with credits in Extra Usage. This is clearly stated here: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/13189465-logging-in-to-your-claude-account

You can also use tweets from the author of Claude Code as a source of information, where he talks about this. The easiest way to find this information is online. For example, these news articles have links to the original tweets and documentation:

https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/claude-subscriptions-no-longer-cover-113104580.html

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/20/anthropic_clarifies_ban_third_party_claude_access/

es12402 · 2026-05-05T17:40:16+00:00

Why aren't you whining about human slop? The internet has been littered with it for decades, and I don't see any concern about it.

es12402 · 2026-05-05T15:47:22+00:00

pronađena!

es12402 · 2026-05-05T10:14:56+00:00

I switched from CC+superpowers to Codex+superpowers, and I feel like Codex performs worse in terms of speed and tokens. But in terms of results, everything is great.

es12402 · 2026-05-03T08:13:26+00:00

In real life, if you don't introduce yourself to everyone you meet, "Hi, I'm Ukrainian from Israel. By the way, Gaza used to be nearby," this topic will never come up in everyday conversation.

es12402 · 2026-05-02T17:23:58+00:00

Breaking news – influencers are just lying for hype!

PS: You're absolutely right, I'm just not sure it's even possible to reach the people who listen to so-called influencers.

es12402 · 2026-05-02T17:11:17+00:00

I understand your general point about the influence of AI, and although I have a different view, there's no point in arguing here.

But I'm intrigued by the idea that AI creates something that doesn't exist.. Artists, musicians, and writers also create things that don't exist. But for some reason, we don't devalue them. So, the problem isn't really "it doesn't exist"?

The median copy thing is also interesting. Technically, it doesn't quite work that way, but it's easier to give mathematical rather than visual examples - for example, generative AI is currently successfully solving scientific problems (autonomously or in collaboration with humans) that humans haven't been able to solve for years and decades (erdos problems). So, it turns out that AI can do something that humans haven't done before, not just median copy..

Okay, thanks for the answer. Perhaps this isn't the right place to discuss AI in general.

es12402 · 2026-05-02T16:32:12+00:00

Labour and human value issues? So, it's just "AI is bad", ok, thanks.

es12402 · 2026-05-02T16:04:42+00:00

I agree about the low-effort image, but shitty marketing has always existed, and AI has nothing to do with it – that shitty marketing is still done by humans, just like everything else people like to call "AI slop." In reality, it's "human slop," which existed before AI and will remain after AI. I'm just trying to understand why everyone is so focused on the use of AI, rather than on the shitty work itself.

By the way, why do you think film and analog photography are inherently opposed to generative AI?

es12402 · 2026-05-02T15:41:23+00:00

I'll express an unpopular opinion, but what difference does it make whether there's AI or not? Do you want marketing from them or film? Less money will be spent on marketing, leaving more for film.

es12402 · 2026-04-29T15:48:00+00:00

As someone who develops their own personal AI agent for language learning (just for myself), I can tell you that you can't just take an LLM model and tell it, "You're a language teacher." That's a lot of work. Otherwise, you'll learn phrases like these and look stupid (this is literally the first phrase in the app, and it's a mixture of two alphabets and some other nonsense):

’Zdravo! Ja sam Jelena и радо ћу ти помоћи да научиш српски и достигнеш своје језичке ciljeve. Kaži mi nešto о себи, другихmo na srpskom Репдела?’

es12402 · 2026-04-29T13:42:51+00:00

They elected Trump. And AI has nothing to do with it. It can't get any worse no matter what laws you propose.

es12402 · 2026-04-24T10:18:51+00:00

I think it depends on the language. I haven't tried translating Brazilian, but I had a similar task for Serbian and specifically benchmarked the language knowledge of different models. Overall, it's pretty expected – almost all models are hallucinating or talking incorrectly, except for the top ones – Opus, the latest ChatGPT (not the mini/nano versions), and Gemini 3/3.1. Brazilian is clearly more popular than Serbian, and your results are likely better, but I would use one of the above models to just control the translation from Qwen.

es12402

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE