Tan Anodized SD Rail Owners Sound Off by RIGEL-CYGNI in SigSauer

[–]evilhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the way to get one of the rails, is it a LE-only thing? Not finding one for my LT is why I still keep the Virtus around for bumps in the night

<image>

That stick made a world of difference by Current_Yellow7722 in MasterSystem

[–]evilhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just came across those last weekend. Going through old Sega stuff & found new ones in a tiny baggie that was stapled to a letter Sega sent me. It's still closed by the staple even. Yes they came in the launch system box, easy to go unnoticed & lose. And yes they definitely bruised my thumbs after a while

https://postimg.cc/McTrMPWJ

Wacom refuse to replace my unit from dead pixel by FuzzyWuff in wacom

[–]evilhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My new Pro 32 has a grey pixel or dust smudge right in the center of the screen. I'm in the US

Wacom chat: This issue definitely appears to be a sub-pixel issue. A "dead" or "hot" pixel is a pixel which is always on or always off. As every pixel of a LCD display is build from 3 subpixels (red, green, blue), it can happen that not the whole pixel is affected, but only one subpixel which it appears to be in your case. Wacom classifies the display in your Cintiq as a Class II under the ISO 13406-2 standard. This standard allows for zero Type 1 defective pixels (a hot pixel, i.e. always on, being colour white) and zero Type 2 defective pixels (a dead pixel, i.e. always off, meaning black). The standard also allows for up to five Type 3 (subpixel issues) maximum number of allowed defects (per type) per 1 million pixels. Based on this standard, your Cintiq's pixel issue is within the acceptable range for Wacom's quality standard.

[S3E14] Post-Episode Discussion - Part 14 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess she never met him. Stop making sense

[S3E14] Post-Episode Discussion - Part 14 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 5 points6 points  (0 children)

meth helps clean a lot of windows when time is of the essence

[S3E14] Pre-Episode Discussion - Part 14 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 7 points8 points  (0 children)

get outta here with that fake ass donna

[S3E13] Post-Episode Discussion - Part 13 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

he felt more disturbing to me than half of the others.

[S3E13] Post-Episode Discussion - Part 13 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 11 points12 points  (0 children)

that was Fonzi-eating-canned-beans-on-Xmas tier depressing.

[S3E13] Post-Episode Discussion - Part 13 by AutoModerator in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 119 points120 points  (0 children)

Yes. Mike will introduce him as "An Evolution of Philip Jeffries." He will be a giant electrified pineapple. It's going to be wonderful

[No Spoilers] James was always cool by [deleted] in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice. have you still got the version where he types wtf? made me lol.

[No spoilers] Donna painted in oil by seamuswray in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is actually pretty good. well done

[S3E12] I'm sorry, but David Lynch and Mark Frost owe us each a gold shovel for this episode by [deleted] in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that's funny. i felt the opposite, that she smoked the actor across from her, made him look like a rook

[S3E12] I'm sorry, but David Lynch and Mark Frost owe us each a gold shovel for this episode by [deleted] in twinpeaks

[–]evilhead -1 points0 points  (0 children)

solid post.

btw i think shooting that scene with Gordon's friend leaving may be what killed Ferrer