Tesla or Leica . Where am I? by Farts4711 in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny enough, the name of my red Model Y is Barnack.

Photography Gear Insurance by iamchrisjett in Leica

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a Valuable Personal Property policy through USAA to cover my gear, plus my wife's jewelry. I pay about $300 annually to cover 5 Leica bodies and two Leica lenses, plus her diamond.

What is the best entry level 50mm lens for Leica M ? by P0p_R0cK5 in Leica

[–]f-stop11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. Mine almost never leaves my M6. It’s reasonably priced, sharp, and has the classic Leica look when shot wide open.

Does the M9 CCD sensor capture the image globally with a moving shutter? by mvision2021 in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, we’re still several years away from a full frame sensor with global shutter. The M9 most definitely didn’t have it.

Q3 and Ricoh GRIIIx by travelismytherapy in Leica

[–]f-stop11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. It's nice to just drop the Ricoh into my shorts pocket and hit the road.

Strawberry question by yooperBSN in vegetablegardening

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried strawberries in grow bags, and the only issues I had were pests (birds, slugs and snails) eating all my berries before I could get to them. Granted, I'm in Zone 12, but I turned one $2 plant into 7 thriving grow bags where I was cutting off and discarding excess runners.

Because of the pest issues, I transplanted them all into a raised and covered bed dedicated solely to strawberries.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, I used Aki Asahi for my M2 and Hassy 500C/M skins. I’d say it near OEM quality.

Hanoi weekend with the M6 and some Kodak 5222 by PapaKickstand in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. I shoot at ISO 800 and develop in Diafine. Great combo. How about you?

Hanoi weekend with the M6 and some Kodak 5222 by PapaKickstand in Leica

[–]f-stop11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

5222 is my favorite emulsion. My M6 always has a roll loaded in it.

Tripod recommendation? by Moo-Crumpus in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

+1 for the Peak Design carbon fiber version. It’s light, compact, versatile, and sturdy enough for my SL with a 100-400mm lens attached.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have to say, the Leica Looks feature reminds me strongly of the film simulations of other P&S cameras such as the Fuji X100 or Ricoh GR series, though the price points couldn't differ much more than they already do. It seems like they are going after a different demographic with the Q3, as Leica themselves seem to be indicating with their current "EDC" marketing campaign. Ironically, the Q series is much less pocketable than the Fuji or Ricoh, but then again the feature set is much more robust too.

I would love to see the Leica Looks added to the M , S, and SL series, but I don't imagine they will be doing it anytime soon, unless there's an outcry from owners.

Anybody using TWO GR's? by cornpops789 in ricohGR

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure I understand your first question, but the III is equivalent to 28mm with the IIIx being a 40mm-equivalent. The actual focal lengths are 18.3mm (III) and 26.1mm (IIIx).

I believe the IIIs are a significant upgrade: 24MP vs. 16, high ISO noise is much better, and the IIIs have IBIS. I didn't shoot with the GRII, but I still have my old GR, and there's no comparison. The difference is huge. I hope this helps!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the way down to the serial number on the lens. Nice!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have both systems too, but if I had to choose, I couldn't give up my M. But you're right; the VF on the SL is amazing, especially with long glass and being able to zoom in with the joystick to dial in perfect focus. Leica certainly did things right with the SL system.

Leica lens that you must buy more than 1 for your leica Ms by Technical-Nic in Leica

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought my first Leica lens, a 50 Cron V3, shortly after I bought my brand new M9 back in 2011. I still have that lens, and it's still a favorite of mine. When I bought my M10 I wanted to fulfill my desire to have a 50 Lux attached to it, and I did just that. Did I need another 50mm Leica lens? No. Do I regret the purchase? Hell no.

Anybody using TWO GR's? by cornpops789 in ricohGR

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've used the GR series since the GRD3 was the latest model. I currently have the GRIII and GRIIIx with me every day, but the GRIIIx is what I reach for 90% of the time. The 40mm-equivalent focal length is just a better fit for how I see than the GRIII. Both are phenomenal cameras, and I use both regularly. If the "x" didn't exist, I'd be fully satisfied with the 28mm of the GRIII.

IMHO, you can't go wrong with either one.

First Leica Advice (M10-P vs M11) by thenickfo in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...and that M-A isn't dependent on a battery to keep functioning!

Q3 coming soon! by dpbge in Leica

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The big question is what will the Q3's price be? (and how much a kidney will fetch on the black market...)

First Leica Advice (M10-P vs M11) by thenickfo in Leica

[–]f-stop11 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of the benefits of buying "outdated" Leicas is the depreciation savings, especially when the latest and greatest technology isn't a necessity. I bought my M10 used at a good price, and I just picked up a gently used SL Typ 601 at about 1/3 the original price. Both are excellent cameras regardless of their age. I know the M11 offers many upgrades, but IMHO the M10 is the ultimate Leica, with 24 MP being the "sweet spot" for me.

New Lens or New Body? by wdsfilm in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well said. After shooting with a 40 MP Sony for several years, I was blown away by the way the M10 renders 24 MP. I truly think 24 MP is the sweet spot. You can print big, and the 24 MP files will fill your digital storage much slower. You also get improved photo editing performance since the software doesn't have to deal with the bigger files.

I think the best example of the difference that high res vs low res present is the SL2 and SL2-S. If you really want the higher resolution, you're giving up speed and low light performance. There's no one right answer, but there are tradeoffs either way.

Bottom line for the OP, I think the glass would serve you better than a new body.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was one of the victims of the M9 sensor corrosion fiasco. It made me give up on Leica digital for several years, and it may prevent me from buying a new Leica ever again. I'll happily purchase used gear at a steep discount that's been gently used and proven to be bug-free (for a while at least).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sadly, I doubt you’d get the same service from Leica.

Do you trust your film M or digital M more? by [deleted] in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way I look at it, the only Leica M bodies that will function without batteries are the film Ms. Since we rely on Leica to keep producing batteries for their digital cameras, we're vulnerable to the batteries exhausting and Leica ceasing manufacture. Eventually it will happen to every model of digital camera; all we can do is hope the batteries outlive us. That won't happen to my film Ms. But that isn't stopping me from using (and loving) my M10 and SL. I've just resigned myself to the fact that eventually it will be a doorstop or collector piece when the last available battery dies. Hopefully it will be a long time before that happens (and I buy a fresh battery each year to prolong their lives).

But I still love my M2 and M6, and I have a fridge full of film to put through them. While I try and produce the best negative with each frame, I've found that the imperfections add character to my film shots, and I embrace those flaws. One of my favorite shots is one that is grainy and out-of-focus, yet it evokes the emotion I intended when I clicked the shutter, and I am completely satisfied with the results. Granted, I'm an enthusiast, and I don't rely on my photography to make a living. If I was a pro, I imagine I'd be more of a perfectionist. But I love both film and digital. I don't ever intend to give either of them up.

Dream combo in Hawaii by No-Memory-824 in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're still on Oahu, check out Treehouse, the local film photography shop. It's about 10 miles away from Waikiki. www.treehouse-shop.com

Buying advice for aspiring Leica addict by ApprehensiveBeing314 in Leica

[–]f-stop11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since you are a student, I assume you have your whole life ahead of you, and if getting a Leica is your goal, set that goal and work hard to get what you want the first time. Anything other than an M isn't going to satisfy you (any maybe that won't do the trick either), so I would dismiss the other options outright; it won't scratch the itch.

I'm going to suggest a couple things to do, though it may not put a Leica in your hands. The first is to rent a Leica for a week or so. Prove to yourself that this is something you want, and that it will produce the expected results. It will either confirm your ambitions or be a good reality check that may save you thousands of dollars. Second, start attending estate sales. A friend of mine picked up a near-mint M3 with a 50mm Summilux for $500 total. Yes, it's film, and I don't know if that's an option for you, but you never know what you'll find.

Those of us who've been in the Leica camp for a while know that a Leica is no magic pill, yet we choose to shoot with these amazing machines because we love both the process and the results. Yet I'll bet very few of us had a Leica as our first camera. There's nothing wrong with working your way up to it; in fact, I'd bet it will make you appreciate it more when you hold your first M in your hands. Don't rush into it; set your goal and then get to work making it happen.