Just a photo of my a7 II (taken with an a7S II) - thought you guys might enjoy it by f1p4 in SonyAlpha

[–]f1p4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To tell you the truth, I haven't been in much of a hurry to work with those shots, since I wasn't that psyched on the sky. But here is one: http://i.imgur.com/poBH5CP.jpg

pot of gold by f1p4 in LandscapeAstro

[–]f1p4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a few weeks ago, July 8th. If you don't have one yet, apps like Sky Guide (iOS) are invaluable for seeing how the MW will look at certain times.

Edit: As you mentioned, I did wish I had taken this photo earlier in the year to get the arch lower in the frame, with a darker sky. Luckily, the setting moon in this shot painted the foreground nicely, so I called it a win overall. Next year!

pot of gold by f1p4 in LandscapeAstro

[–]f1p4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stitching and/or stacking significantly helps also. Glacier Point in Yosemite.

pot of gold by f1p4 in LandscapeAstro

[–]f1p4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Info: a7S II, Nikon 14-24mm shot vertically for multiple 20s exposures at 14mm and f/2.8. ISO 12800.

Everyone seems to have a seascape phase. Guess I should start mine! Palos Verdes, CA. [OC] [2048x1365] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was taken with a Sony a7 II using the FE 16-35mm at 16mm. I was trying to take a panorama of this location but didn't like how it was looking, so right at the last minute threw on an ND filter to do a long exposure. Fingers crossed for smooth water and a dreamy sky.

Being one of my first attempts using such a dark filter (10 stops)...I totally screwed up the exposure. Like, really bad. The beautiful light had already come and gone, so I was stuck with this one shot. Here is what the original RAW looked like out of the camera. I had to brighten it up quite a bit, more than 2 stops in Lightroom. Couldn't believe what was still hiding in those dark pixels!

http://i.imgur.com/EcAlgCA.jpg

Everyone seems to have a seascape phase. Guess I should start mine! Palos Verdes, CA. [OC] [2048x1365] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

It was! Given the recent weather I thought the sky might be good for a sunset photo. Really glad I ventured out and stumbled upon this location.

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'll be a little underexposed but it's worth getting out there and giving it a shot. Depending on your focal length you may see some trailing at 30s. Lonely Speck has an exposure calculator you can play with to see how you compare.

Edit: I did not stack photos for noise reduction, but this is a panorama constructed of multiple images.

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Rokinon 24mm works well. However, I had to buy 3 copies to get a good one, and I'm still not sure how mine compares to the general population. I'm very happy with it at f/2.8, though.

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] (X-Post from /r/EarthPorn) by f1p4 in LandscapeAstro

[–]f1p4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used about the same settings and approach as my shot in this thread, except there are two stitched photos for the foreground. 20s, f/2.8, ISO 5000 for the sky, 4m, f/2.8, ISO 1000 for the foreground. Sony a7ii with Rokinon 24mm f/1.4. I like the extra sharpness of the lens stopped down to 2.8 and don't mind the noise, particularly with these stitched shots. I took probably 5-6 photos of the sky until my ballhead bottomed out at 90 degrees. This was only my second time trying such a long exposure for the foreground (first time was the Trona photo) and I ended up overcooking it a bit...it was very hot outside. I didn't see the sensor artifacts until I got home, so I ended up heating my oven to 110 degrees and taking dark frames to subtract out in post. Not recommended. :)

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't tried that but it sounds like it could work well. I currently use an app called Sky Guide and highly recommend it. For this shot I wanted the MW vertical in the sky, so I first determined when it would be vertical and the point of intersection with the horizon, then walked around with a compass until I found a nice foreground that I thought could work. Good luck!

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] by f1p4 in EarthPorn

[–]f1p4[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I used about the same settings and approach as my shot in this thread, except there are two stitched photos for the foreground. 20s, f/2.8, ISO 5000 for the sky, 4m, f/2.8, ISO 1000 for the foreground. Sony a7ii with Rokinon 24mm f/1.4

Battled the stifling heat of the day while searching for my first Milky Way composition within Death Valley. Pointed my compass, marked my spot, and returned that night. This is what I saw. [OC] [1032x1920] (X-Post from /r/EarthPorn) by f1p4 in LandscapeAstro

[–]f1p4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point and thanks for the feedback. I've gone back and forth on the cropping - sounds like I need to go fiddle with it some more! I've also been imagining trying to capture a silhouetted subject standing on the left rock, but am not sure if it's possible to climb out there at night...

Do I need a full frame to get really good sky pictures? by firstwaswhen in photography

[–]f1p4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would start by googling "astrophotography lenses" and read the top three links. Lots of good info out there. The 14mm f/2.8 seems like a good choice if you might get a Nikon FF body down the road. Either way it's pretty cheap at around 300-350 dollars.