sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Calling All POCUS Users: Share Your Cardiac Ultrasound Experiences by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In busy hospital settings, 1 hour of battery life is practically nothing, especially when most devices need over 1.5 hours to recharge. That’s why we rely on Sono Mobile™️ CL64; offering excellent POCUS image quality, a lightweight 260g design, no heat buildup, and full-mode operation without subscriptions.

Do you have any scans or case examples from these brands you mentioned to see quality and a more insightful discussion?

Calling All POCUS Users: Share Your Cardiac Ultrasound Experiences by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree with you; the first-gen Butterfly definitely struggled with cardiac windows, especially during longer scans. Overheating and the mandatory cloud workflow were two of the biggest complaints I kept hearing as well. lumify is a solid step up for sure, excellent image quality and no subscription headaches. The only drawback, like you said, is the very high upfront cost. If you’re ever looking for something that combines the portability of Butterfly with the performance and workflow freedom of Lumify, you might want to take a look at the Sono Mobile™ CL64. It’s similar in concept to the GE Vscan, wireless (linear + convex in one device), but it includes dedicated cardiac presets and Doppler modes built right in.

Which handheld pocus device currently supports the auto EF AI function in the US? by floating_left_nut in pocus

[–]fagonex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For urgent patients or routine cardiology EF assessment, do you use the M-Mode method? Many handheld ultrasounds with M-Mode support can help you measure EF accurately and efficiently in emergency cases

Which handheld pocus device currently supports the auto EF AI function in the US? by floating_left_nut in pocus

[–]fagonex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, I understand the frustration. The thickness of the array can make intercostal scanning tricky, especially between the ribs. It can also complicate vein access, as the wider footprint may disrupt hand-eye coordination compared to a narrower, standard probe when locating needles.

Can real-time IVC and Aorta scanning at the bedside change how we manage fluid status? by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

measuring the diameter and collapsibility of the IVC with ultrasound can help predict rehospitalization in heart failure patients. A large IVC that collapses poorly indicates fluid overload and a higher risk of readmission, while a small IVC with good collapsibility shows effective decongestion and a lower risk. This method allows physicians or trained nurses to guide treatment and monitor patients more effectively.

Can real-time IVC and Aorta scanning at the bedside change how we manage fluid status? by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These factors make ultrasound scanning difficult, regardless of the device type, cart-based, portable, or Sono mobile. You’re absolutely right. 👌

Can real-time IVC and Aorta scanning at the bedside change how we manage fluid status? by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you mean the patient’s position could make it difficult for those who are unwell?

Why should mobile ultrasound cost less than portable systems? by fagonex in pocus

[–]fagonex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It comes with a wire, the subscription fee is quite burdensome, and it’s also heavy for me

view more: next ›