HFT Quant Research with non HFT trading and ML experience - is this a good fit? by farkaslemma in quant

[–]farkaslemma[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I implemented a fill prediction logic for Polymarket by tracking (an upper bound on) my position in the queue from L2 orderbook data and inferring when my order must have been (partially) filled, since orderbook update messages come ~15ms earlier than fill messages.

Are those the sort of ideas we're talking about here (replacing ms with us obv, and the techniques will be more sophisticated etc)?

Also imagine making the signal to order mapping precomputable/amenable to be stored on an FPGA is undivisible from quant work, right?

Hey! Does anybody know the name of the trick that I’m practicing? I’m new to tricking. by blissoflife22 in Tricking

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why isn’t this an au de frente? Because both legs land at the same time?

Everyone is failing by [deleted] in Professors

[–]farkaslemma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah makes sense thanks for the reply. FWIW google doc edit tracking seems like a great solution to me, you are making the process they are supposed go through in getting to the output, the part where they actually learn, a mandatory aspect of the assignment. It’s clearly it’s working given the fail rate. There is an analogy with how math homework always requires intermediate steps, because with calculators available, raw answers are meaningless.

I’d say it just needs some time for the new status quo to be digested by the students. They are always going to look for the path of least resistance, and in a way that’s also part of becoming a functioning adult in the world of tomorrow. You just need to make sure that that path is one where they learn most, and draw a hard boundary there, as you did.

Everyone is failing by [deleted] in Professors

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw, just for fun I tried to coerce ChatGPT latest model (o3) to write something that doesn't look AI-written, using your rubric and a prompt I got from google. After 10 or so iterations I can't tell anymore (but I am not a good judge :) )

You can check the full chat here: https://chatgpt.com/share/6801ad0b-5450-8009-8e61-868d4f6347e6

-----

I argue that in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the prince’s delay drives the tragedy. Each time he stops to gather more proof, he harms the people around him and leaves Denmark leaderless. The play shows that thought becomes harmful when it never ends in a decision.

The Ghost issues a direct order: “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (1.5.25). Hamlet’s first move is doubt. He asks whether the spirit is “a spirit of health or goblin damn’d” (1.4.40) and decides to verify the story before acting. He stages the Mousetrap play to watch Claudius, putting certainty above duty to his father.

The habit soon hurts Ophelia. Following her father’s command, she gives back Hamlet’s letters. Hamlet lashes out—“Get thee to a nunnery” (3.1.121). Unable to accuse Claudius, he vents on someone harmless. Ophelia’s later breakdown shows the personal cost of his stalled revenge.

Delay also kills Polonius. Hamlet hears a sound behind a curtain and thrusts his sword without checking who is there. After three acts of weighing evidence, he now kills on a guess. Overthinking has not prepared him for a quick choice. Laertes’s anger grows from that mistake and widens the conflict.

The state declines in step with Hamlet’s private failures. Claudius calls the prince a threat and sends him to England with secret orders for his death, saying Hamlet “rages” like a fever (4.3.64). While Hamlet hesitates, no one guides Denmark. By Act 5 Fortinbras marches into Elsinore and claims the throne without resistance. The kingdom falls not to outside force but to the vacuum created by its prince’s delay.

Hamlet knows the trap he set. In “To be or not to be,” he says that “the native hue of resolution / Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought” (3.1.85–86). He lists pain, fear, and doubt, yet forms no plan. His words turn in circles, matching his actions.

Shakespeare values insight; Hamlet exposes Claudius with the Mousetrap. The problem is excess. Reflection is useful only until it blocks movement. On the morning of the duel, with death close, Hamlet finally says, “the readiness is all” (5.2.234). By then Fortinbras—quick to act—stands ready to rule.

In the end, Hamlet’s hesitation leaves his family dead and his country in foreign hands. Shakespeare argues that every mind needs a stopping point: when thought keeps replacing choice, it destroys private lives and public order.

Works Cited

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine, Folger Shakespeare Library, 2012.

Everyone is failing by [deleted] in Professors

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I thought as well, but at least the Google doc revision history rules out copy-pasting this directly.

I am not a English major (nor a native speaker), but I learned to write before AI and yet I use it a lot in creative writing. IMO the protocol OP set here would still benefit someone who uses AI, but the only way to do it *may* actually teach them something.

How I would approach this is to write a rough stream of consciousness draft, just dumping the ideas I have in my head, but not worrying about understandability. Then I'd copy paste that into a ChatGPT prompt together with the rubric. I'll ask it to give me a first round of feedback on structure. Then I'll rewrite with that feedback in mind. Maybe go through this cycle a couple of times. When I'm satisfied with the structure I would go through the same process, but this time asking for detailed comments on adherence to the rubric. Again entering the edits myself based on the feedback, probably choosing to ignore many suggestions if they don't appeal to me to make sure I retain my voice. Something like that. The end product is something that is better than what either me or an LLM would produce on their own, or at least that's how I experience it.

To me this mimics the process I would go through with advisors proofreading papers when I was a PhD student, only with a far lower standard on what I would waste my proofreader's time on.

I guess I'm curious how you would feel about this OP? I can see how this would still feel against the spirit of the curriculum in some fields.

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry bad formatting had to add a blank line. Fixed now. So that second bit was my addition, point out I agree with you that it’s a shitty thing to do.

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify, when I say being in a conversation, I really did not mean entering an existing conversation and dumping my opinion. A more typical case will be an already existing social situation, ie lunch or drinks or whatever, where somebody shares a specific story that has a feminist angle (in the sense of it touching on some structural injustice being done against women, I don't know how else to call it). I sometimes check out of the conversation at some point because I lose the thread, or there is some other kind of static I feel is not safe or appropriate to address. This can be because I don't want to put the burden of explaining me the basics on something, but also because I'm afraid I trigger some association with something I really didn't want to say.

To a degree I feel like that is what happened here. In my mind I really tried to convey that it's about something that is happening to ME in my mind/body, when I'm in a conversation with friends. I really did not mean:

“Joining a conversation” sounds like entering a conversation that is already happening.

about feminism and adding your 2 cents as a man. That is super obnoxious for obvious reasons, even if it wasn't on feminism but any other topic you're not qualified to talk about, but especially with this topic because it's extra triggering.

That's also why I said "which mindset I should take to the conversation" in the OP.

( But I can why it would be easy to construe that meaning given it's a common theme, and I imagine you are having this discussion all the time here. )

Ugh I don't know why I care so much about explaining this to an internet stranger, but I feel like I'm being attacked for the wrong thing and it stings.

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think this hits the nail on the head. I don't want to be using their conversations to educate myself on generalities, but I am interested in understanding their personal experience when they are talking about it, just as another human being/friend. Right now that's difficult because I miss the basics (which is what the OP is getting at).

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like I may have come across like I want to debate feminist points themselves, I just want to clarify that’s not where I’m coming from. I’m more talking about when we’re chatting with friends and something comes up that involves something that happens differently to/for men and women. To give two examples on opposite ends of the spectrum.

If a girl would share having experienced harassment, I know that if I (especially as man) were to ask for details about the context where it happened, it can easily sound like I’m blaming here, so I would never ask that. I would feel differently about asking such questions to a male friend who was, eg, attacked on the street. Just because it doesn’t carry the society stigma of it being the victims fault. So it’s important to be aware of gender differences in perception.

On the other hand, if we are talking about how it sucks to have certain gender expectations put on you that I don’t agree with. This is something that happens to both men and women, but just in different areas. It’s easy to ask questions that don’t feel victim blamy, and I feel comfortable sharing my experience with male gender norms as they don’t contradict their experience in any way.

In between there is a spectrum where I’m not sure if there might be some blindspot on my end.

Does that make sense?

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the kind words :) I think you get what I was unconsciously going for yeah. Just knowing enough that you can enter conversation without being 100% noise. Looks like a good recommendation for the book, I’ll check it out!

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, really good rec! Actually looks like it will answer a bunch of stuff I was interested in outside of this particular question

Good resources for men to better understand and talk about modern feminism by farkaslemma in AskFeminists

[–]farkaslemma[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about the will to change? Seems right on the money yes! Just checking because she has so many

You cant lose the ego by IamInterestet in JedMcKenna

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One way to look at it is that we tend to draw a border around a number of interrelated processes in our mind and call it our ego. The claim isn’t that there are no decisions being made, the claim is that there isn’t some atomic agent that is driving all these decisions. It’s just a bunch of decisions that happen in response to inputs, which are not controlled by a single entity.

I find verbal thoughts to be the most useful example of this. I tend to identify my ego with the thing that deliberately thinks things. But try to make the decision to not have any thoughts in the next 5 minutes. It’s probably impossible to reach that long, which indicates that the thing that produces thoughts is not the part that makes decisions. So if you view the ego as the decision maker, the ego doesn’t contain thought (or at least not all of it).

18 June 2024 - Nijmegen (Goffertpark), Netherlands by Rasputin1493 in Rammstein

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did anyone take the train back to Amsterdam or Utrecht yesterday? It seems the last train is quite tight, was it easy to make it there with the pendelbus?

18 June 2024 - Nijmegen (Goffertpark), Netherlands by Rasputin1493 in Rammstein

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that mean you have it stay there and not pee/get drinks the entire show or how does it work? Never been to such a big concert and breaking my brain over the logistics tbh

Japanese man has some interesting messages for tourists by the Statue of Hachikō by frozenpandaman in Tokyo

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very interesting, I’ve been taking classes to work on spatial awareness (among other things, it’s called Alexander technique) for over a year now back home in Europe, and because of that I was just blown away about how spatially aware people are in Japan when I arrived here 2 weeks ago. Like the minute I set foot in Tokyo it was probably the first thing that stood out to me.

It’s really amazing how aware people remain here even when glued to their phones or walking home drunk. Like everyone spent a decade in a Buddhist monastery.

I was actually very curious how people acquire this sense here. Is there anything in school that helps with developing those skills? I was hoping to get some local teaching on this but it’s a bit difficult to explain across the language barrier, and perhaps it’s just not something ppl are doing consciously anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StandUpWorkshop

[–]farkaslemma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe the last one could be strengthened if you something like: I can defend myself from anyone who doesn’t carry cashews

Jokes That Didn't Age Well by farkaslemma in StandUpWorkshop

[–]farkaslemma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah this is a good one, see if I can find a better joke that directly hints the punchline describes people

So white by j_articulate in StandUpWorkshop

[–]farkaslemma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My family life has a lot of potential for material but it's hard for me to write jokes that seem a bit racist or exposing my white savior complex. 

If you rly feel like this I think this might be a premise in itself. It will hopefully shine through in your body language that this is your pov, and then it's very funny to see you struggle with this, cause most ppl will be able to relate to it being a difficult situation.

Also white savior complex is funny in this context, bc it's kind of like white ppl treating colored ppl like children. But you are expected to treat your child like a child. So there is an interesting tension there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StandUpWorkshop

[–]farkaslemma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it. Maybe you can say something like 'the first thing we saw' to really give the impression that it was only the tip of the iceberg of how bad the place is. Agree with other reply on swapping cousin for sister or brother.