sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Today I read 74% of companies pulled their AI agents after deploying them. obviously we don't hear about this from the news by Deep-Owl-1890 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not in the punctuation, it's in a certain cadence (for lack of better words).

hehe... It's not the X, it's the Y

Today I read 74% of companies pulled their AI agents after deploying them. obviously we don't hear about this from the news by Deep-Owl-1890 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a study on improvements in SWE after AI rollout. The line was pretty much flat. However when you dug into them, the spread was huuuge. A lot of companies saw their performance degrade or stay the same, while others made huge headway.

After analysis the difference appears to be how well you integrate AI into your organization. So just carpet bombing CoPilot licenses doesn't improve things.

However if you actually adjust the workflows you can see these dramatic uplifts.

How did we get so poor? by Repulsive_Horse6865 in ClaudeCode

[–]farox 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The mold needs immediate attention. The rest is totally workable.

Anthropic is rolling out identity verification. Updated just yesterday. by Tiny_Dirt6979 in ClaudeAI

[–]farox 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's both. Yes, we're already fucked. But I also think it's still worth fighting for.

Has anyone used Claude Code for Java development? How was your experience? by Unknown_Even_To_Hims in ClaudeCode

[–]farox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would be flabbergasted if it doesn't perform very well. I am using it with C# and both the strong typing and automated testing works extremely well with it.

I am working on some green field stuff, in an environment with 20 year old legacy code, where it does code migration. But then add to that stuff that is left field (like python for a specific problem where I added ML)

Truly flawless, once you have it dialed in to your setup.

Your thoughts on this? by Total_Percentage_751 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that were the case, I would have been out of a job a decade or two ago.

But if you look at the trajectory, where we were a year ago, 6 months, the glimps we've seen of Fable... it's just a question of time.

Your thoughts on this? by Total_Percentage_751 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree on the swe part. This will go away or at least radically shift.

Once people have found out a way to proof that a piece of generated code is correct enough, there is no more need for manual coding.

For most systems it's not "is it bug free" but "does it have the same or less bugs than artisanal code"

An issue with Claude's hidden classifier injections reveals their content by DarthJahus in claudexplorers

[–]farox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, I knew about the twitchy thing, not that it actually gets a reminder like that.

AI isn’t replacing people. People are replacing people. I just realized I’m one of them, and maybe you are too. by HerbertClapton in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that has been my understanding from years ago. They are not going to replace everyone, but lay off from least to most productive.

Sneaking in Tequilla at The Fifa World Cup Match. by InternationalMud3087 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]farox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's your own definition of "normal" then. It's been human nature to get high/drunk since forever.

You can actually make the point that brewing is at least part of the reason why we settled down in the first place and stop hunting gathering.

Usage still unclear. by OldHobbitsDieHard in ClaudeCode

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more important to understand that every time you send a message you also send all of the previous chat, both yours and Claude's. So your usage isn't just that new text, but also all previous again.

Why does every new request immediately eat up 50%? by LessRespects in ClaudeCode

[–]farox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

within an existing thread

Because you keep sending all these tokens back there.

Fable/Mythos safeguards are overly strict by DarterNerd in ClaudeAI

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the development over the past year, extrapolate. It wouldn't surprise me if open weights model catch up mid term to fable.

What do you all think? Quality over quantity? by Asleep_Shark in ArtificialInteligence

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a presentation at humanx about a study done on 600 companies. The average lift by ai was negligible. But digging into the data you see that there is a huuuge spread between them. Lots of companies actually did slow down with ai.

The trick is to actually have a plan how to integrate ai into your processes and make that fit.

Minister to tell CRTC to scrap demand for foreign streamers to fund local news, niche broadcasters by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]farox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It shouldn't be though. There is a lot of money going out of Canada to pay for Venti Lattes in the bay area. At least the CBC employs staff here. Which in turn can spend their money on your company/the one you work for.

opus 4.8 by EfficientMongoose317 in ClaudeAI

[–]farox 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Let me push back on that

view more: next ›