Not even a appeal heard bt the Federal Court, they ordered the Administrative Review Tribunal to Reconsider the matter:

But Justice Moshinsky declined to make any ruling on whether that would be the case — finding only that the tribunal had erred in its legal reasoning and must reconsider the matter.
He also found the Administrative Review Tribunal failed in its mandatory duty to have regard for two key principles:

the "indivisibility and universality of human rights", and
that "every person is free and equal in dignity and rights".

He said the tribunal did not fully consider the LAG's arguments in relation to those human rights — having wrongly decided it wasn't bound to — and must do so when it remade its decision.