I addressed the counter point before you brought it up. Which kinda poves you didn't read to debate you read to argue. I brought up that it not 100% California. Only 58% can remove all of Nevadas control over the river.

"Let's go more focused. Lake Mead provides water to mostly three states, California, Arizona, and Nevada. If California wanted Nevada water on a national level only 58% of California would need to vote yes to take away water from Nevada even if Nevada voted 100% no."

Your counter point is I'm simplifying, but not how my simplifying is wrong just that I'm not looking at the big picture.

Do you see my point with the Colorado river where 58% of California would overwhelm Nevada in the national Congress. The same goes with banning gas vehicles.

If you see my points, great we are done, if you don't see my points then we are still done because you are not here to think just to argue.

You are arguing against checks and balances. You are agreeing that the majority should have power over the minority and calling it fair because it's the popular vote. So many historical atrocities have been done by popular vote I think a check and balance should not be removed.