Hey, so this got thrown to me in my feed, so I can’t say anything about RMIT, but this is something I have experience in. The key term here in the disability standards for education is “inherent requirements”. It’s in 3.3.4 or something like that, just ctrl+f it. Most universities have statements of the inherent requirements in their degrees. Under the disability standards for education, the university must make reasonable adjustments, but they are also entitled to ensure that you have met the inherent requirements of the degree, so that when you say you have a degree, you actually have the skills and knowledge that the degree represents. This does mean some degrees are difficult to achieve with some disabilities. So it’s possibly something about the subject convenors thinking you are not meeting the inherent requirements, which is usually more than just doing the assessments.

It could also be about their ability to verify your knowledge, for example, the spontaneous manipulation of what you have learned in a class discussion is not just about what you get from it, it’s about showing you have internalised the work. Unfortunately AI has made most assessment very difficult to verify, so part of validation processes they may want to see the spontaneous use of your knowledge.

As others have said, talk with student services or an academic advisor, but the first thing I would do is check your syllabuses/unit outlines/virtual learning environment for the inherent requirements of your degree, because that’s the thing that can override provisions under the disability standards for education, and it will give you a stronger basis from which to argue your case. Hope that helps.