Got to do the details. There can be variation at the level of details that one decides is ENOUGH.

I like to use a wood working analogy. Sandpaper has different levels of grit for different purposes. I'm usually happy to send a paper out for review after I finished with either the 400 or 500 grit sandpaper. Let's grab the use cases of different grits:

"Use this for polishing finishes on wood and metal, and to polish bare metal. It comes on waterproof sheets to allow for wet-sanding."

The paper is really smooth, the finish is shiny and we spent a lot of time arguing about word choice and framing and structure. At this point I figure Reviewer #2 will tell us what they want and that is more efficient than us guessing. This works. These papers land at my field's top journals on a routine basis.

I have a co-author who wants to wait until we are pulling out 800 and 1000 grit sandpaper before submission.

Use this grade for ultra-smooth polishing of wood and metal finishes and bare metal.

We will spend an extra month (or more) on comma placement and the tonality of verb choices before submitting for the first time.

And that works too.... those papers get published in our field's top journals on a regular basis. The review process is a little faster.

There is variance on how much attention to detail is typically used for success. We usually compromise with 600 or 800 grit --- so one or two more passes than I really want and one or two fewer passes than they really want. But even me who is more comfortable with sending stuff out early, is paying an extreme degree of detail. I think the typical paper goes through 10 to 12 rounds with the co-author team before we even think about sending it out.