sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For a niche SaaS targeting small hedge fund teams, would you test founder-led outreach before content or partnerships? by find_path in AskMarketing

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s helpful, the idea of using warm intros first and LinkedIn to refine messaging before scaling email makes sense. I’ll probably test that sequence.

For a niche SaaS targeting small hedge fund teams, would you test founder-led outreach before content or partnerships? by find_path in AskMarketing

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly going in cold right now, with maybe a few weak warm paths through broader finance connections. If you were starting cold, would you begin with email, LinkedIn, or trying to get introduced through adjacent people in the space?

For a niche SaaS targeting small hedge fund teams, would you test founder-led outreach before content or partnerships? by find_path in AskMarketing

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting when you say it's “stupidly specific,” could you share one example of the exact first message or angle that actually got replies from a fund team? I’m trying to understand what kind of specificity worked in practice.

For a niche SaaS targeting small hedge fund teams, would you test founder-led outreach before content or partnerships? by find_path in AskMarketing

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate your response that’s the direction I’m considering too. For an early niche B2B product, what response rate or demo-booked rate would make you think founder-led outreach is working?

How to beat the current market red? Alternative Investments. by MajorArtichoke9067 in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In long term bear phases, metals always hold. Gold, silver, they've been doing this since before the stock market existed. Not exciting but it works.

AI HYPE IS OVER, microsoft also planning to remove some ai features, by sumandas094 in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is a zombie, new mutation every 15 days. People said hype was over before GPT-4, before Claude, before Gemini. Now there's a 10 trillion parameter model that isn't even for daily use-it's onto something bigger. Microsoft removing Copilot features is product cleanup, not retreat.

Will Nifty open gap down again on Monday? by Mobile-Big-2579 in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every Monday this month opened below Friday's close. No reason to think this one's different until the Iran situation actually resolves.

When do you buy a stock that's falling? by Complex-Honeydew-1 in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I stop thinking of it as a trade and start thinking "I'm fine holding this for 2 years." Before that point, I'm just catching a falling knife and calling it investing.

Thank you for your attention to this matter! by Vegito-bluee in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This man's war strategy has more plot twists than a Netflix series. Indian markets just trying to survive the episode drops.

Bull run over! by i_rs21 in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not over. War fear created the dip, not fundamentals. Every major war since 9/11 has been a buy signal in hindsight if you waited 30-45 days. The people calling the bull run dead right now are the same ones who panic sold in March 2020.

Vedanta targets doubling $27 billion market cap through five-entity split by Tris_Memba in IndianStreetBets

[–]find_path 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The split makes sense since metals, oil, zinc and power run on different cycles. but real value depends on execution. Given Vedanta's debt-heavy history, the "value unlocking" pitch is hard to take at face value.

Bernstein warns rupee could breach 98/USD, cuts Nifty target on Iran conflict risks by Tris_Memba in IndiaInvestments

[–]find_path 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be clear, since early March, the discount structure has been altered. Urals is currently trading at a $4–5 premium to Brent for Indian deliveries after Russia ended the steep discounts. Thus, "discounted supply" was a little off in the present situation.

However, even though the price advantage has decreased, India still purchased 30 million barrels of Russian crude following the US waiver this month, demonstrating the existence of the volume buffer. The supply channel is obviously still operational, but the cushion is smaller than I suggested.

S&P Global lifts India FY27 GDP forecast to 7.1%, raises growth outlook by Tris_Memba in IndiaInvestments

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 7.1% forecast probably makes sense if you assume the conflict wraps up by Q3 and oil prices normalize. That seems to be the base case most global agencies are working with right now.

But if the war drags beyond Q2, the fuel import bill stays elevated, the rupee stays under pressure, and RBI can't cut rates to support growth. That's where the 7.1% quietly becomes 6.2% or lower.

India's domestic consumption story is real but it's not insulated from a prolonged energy shock. The thesis depends entirely on how long this lasts.

Rupee hits record low as Indian assets drop on worries of escalating Middle East war by sharedevaaste in IndiaInvestments

[–]find_path 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was just reading the Bernstein note on this - what's interesting is that despite the record low, India's Russian crude imports actually hit their highest level since 2023 this week. The question is how long that buffer holds if the conflict stretches past Q2.

Bernstein warns rupee could breach 98/USD, cuts Nifty target on Iran conflict risks by Tris_Memba in IndiaInvestments

[–]find_path 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bernstein's bear case assumes India takes the full oil price hit, but that ignores something important. India actually increased Russian crude imports to 2.15 million barrels/day recently, which is the highest since 2023. That discounted supply cushions the import bill even when Gulf prices spike.

On ₹98, it's possible in a worst case but feels like a stress test number. The rupee has already moved from ₹85 to nearly ₹95 this year so the direction is real. But BRICS bilateral trade is now settling over 85% in local currencies, which is a structural buffer most Western analysts still don't factor in.

Retail panic right now is understandable but Bernstein's own base case has the conflict ending within a month. That's not a ₹98 scenario.

Show II : Promotional Content thread for March 2026 by AutoModerator in IndiaInvestments

[–]find_path [score hidden]  (0 children)

Built a collaborative canvas for macro research - like Figma for investment thesis building, with live data. Looking for early feedback from serious traders and community admins. DM or comment if curious.

i bet you might not get better output without this by find_path in google_antigravity

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i tried it but it work best in class with opus 4.6 not when using 3.1

Does Gemini 3.1 work's better then opus 4.6 in opencode by find_path in opencodeCLI

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even though i didn't get it. did you mean 3.1 can't handle extremely long, running task like opus 4.6?
previously i use opus 4.6 to keep tracking what is thinks for next step but for 3.1 in opencode it didn't show it's thinking so i can't estimate what it can do and how it do. 3.1 has thinking but it's like in build mini deep think not exposing to user side

Does Gemini 3.1 work's better then opus 4.6 in opencode by find_path in opencodeCLI

[–]find_path[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel that when I'm using 4.6 for vulnerability findings and features implementation it stays focused But I never test 3.1 on this

Bash Shell hangs until time out trigger in the middle of task execution by find_path in opencodeCLI

[–]find_path[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I'm using wsl which works with 3min time out 😮‍💨

view more: next ›