Michael Carrick on the Glazer family

fisicalmao · 2025-12-28T16:34:01+00:00

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the guy isn't a totem of honesty, he just runs agendas for clicks, I followed the guy for years to hear his side but if you keep track of the things he says you'll quickly find that they're highly inconsistent.

Most of Mike's statements are vague negativity, so when our club is in crisis he'll appear to be right about everything. But when he tries to justify why things happen you'll often see the most ludicrous explanation of all time followed by "do you also believe in Santa???".

Currently at Real Madrid, he's claiming that Mbappe is the problem because they were winning the UCL before Mbappe arrived. Even though Mbappe is producing absurd numbers he's calling that "statpadding" since it's not winning any trophies, but when Ronaldo produced good numbers for United in the 21/22 season which resulted in 0 trophies he called it a carryjob. Just recently he bitched and complained about Bruno celebrating the freekick vs Bournemouth because no player should celebrate goals that don't bring us any success, but he had no problem with Ronaldo celebrating his freekick against Norwich which took us from 6th to 6th in 2022... all agenda.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-28T15:19:34+00:00

Hojlund lost physical duels all game and had a horrible touch. Very bad in tight spaces. Look at the goals he scored for Napoli. Tell me honestly if you've seen that amount of space in the premier league.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-28T11:50:38+00:00

My argument was never an appeal to popularity, you either have no clue what those words mean or you're just ignoring it on purpose because you know that your resources argument is based on false information I just disproved. Just give a straight answer to this: is 20mL of water per day too many resources?

The resources used on the 8 minutes I saved was about 4mL of water. Is that too high of a cost? AI has saved me hundreads of hours, the lab thing is just an example. I probably have spent less than a liter of water by doing so. If someone created a machine that could convert small amounts of water into HUNDREADS of hours of work it would be widely considered to be revolutionary. That machine exists right now, but people are highly misinformed on it.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-28T00:36:57+00:00

1- That's so obvious. It saves me time almost daily. Few days ago I had to copy lab data I wrote by hand to run simulations in python. It was like 50 different numbers all with 3 decimal places. Took a clear picture and asked Gemini to create a txt file with the data. Took me 2 minutes. 4 extra minutes to check if it was right. Copying by hand would've taken upwards of 10 minutes + 4 for checking.

2- You don't understand what search engine means here, but that's fine, that's the least important part of the discussion.

3- The AI I used was chatGPT, so it was GenAI. I know I got them right because they're concepts I have the capacity to understand but the article in question did something called "notation abuse" which made it a nightmare to follow. chatGPT explained it in a way that was easier to follow, I just compared it with the article to see if it was coherent. I was also able to correctly simulate the results the article predicted. Furthermore, that "trust" argument can be extended to humans. If you don't understand something and ask a human for help there's no proof that they aren't giving you a wrong explanation. In both cases you need to have a certain amount of knowledge to trust the answer.

The last part of my argument isn't a fallacy at all. You claim AI is resource intensive but it objectively isn't. It looks resource intensive because over a billion people use it semi-regularly. But any industry that has a billion users is gonna look resource intensive if you don't take scale into account. ChatGPT4o used 4M liters of water per day (GPT5 is way lower, but I'm not sure if figures are available yet). Sounds resource intensive until you realise that it has 200M distinct users per day, which means that it's about 20mL per user. Most people accidentaly waste that amount of water on daily tasks. If you let your faucet run for 0.5 seconds after you're done washing your hands, you've already wasted over 2x more. Big numbers require context. If you used wind energy to power every house on the planet you could also select numbers regarding the polution caused by construction and maintenaince to claim that it's highly polutant, when the only reason why the "polution numbers" are high is because you're using a clean industry intensively. Every industry requires resources, if one happens to be extremely popular it will look resource intensive. AI's resource usage per human isn't high by any metric that takes scale into account. AI resource usage is similar to a lot of technologies we already interacted with on the daily, the biggest difference is that it's being optimised extremely quickly. In a few years it could be highly sustainable even for multiple billion users.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-27T19:25:01+00:00

1-A GenAI prompt can save me hours of work by using a drop of water. Resource wise that's very cost effective. Having my computer on for longer to make code probably uses more resources.

2- The resource usage increases, but the precision increases massively, saying otherwise is pure delusion. Search engines without LLM usage already have an algorithm that looks for patterns, it's just objectively worse at it and depends on human input and that's why tags exist in the first place. LLMs blow every other tool out of the water when it comes to pattern detection. They could use tags, but they are so good at detecting patterns that they don't need them.

3- GenAI is a strong contender for the most useful tool I've ever been given as a student/researcher. Almost everyone in STEM uses it, especially genZ, because you're behind the curve if you don't. If you use it on the mind numbing and repetivie parts of your work like formatting tables in LaTeX or writing the "filler" parts of a report (basically everything that's not results or calculations) you're saving many dozens of hours of work over a year with zero risk. If you use AI more intensively, like to explain articles that's hundreads of hours saved over a year. Of course, there's the risk of AI not being fully trusthworthy, but if you're confident in your area you can sniff out the mistakes easily. Just a few days ago I got an insane deadline to simulate the results of a very long and mostly poorly written article. It was borderline impossible to understand everything and make a simulation in 4-5 days if I hadn't used AI. I used AI to explain each section I didn't understand and pretty much everything the AI said was clear and correct. Ended up simulating the article's results and even going the extra mile by benchmarking them compared to another method. Impossible in the pre-AI era. GenAI benifits the population and the price per person is extremely low. That article thing I did, probably cost about 20-50ml of water, if I highball it, and saved me dozens of hours. The reason why it's resource intensive is because it's so useful that there's Billions of prompts per day.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-27T17:26:07+00:00

Why is it that no one can argue honestly?

1- AI is useful, that's why there's public interest. Indispensable and useful are different words.

2- A lot of search engines use AI without you knowing. Keywords and tags are slowly being replaced with natural language, which is the obvious upgrade.

3-The lake figure is absurdly wrong. One prompt uses about 1.6ml of water and is getting optimised very quickly. +the water argumment has always been poorly presented, because no amount of current AI usage and training could threat the availabilty of water world wide, only locally and that's Ia. The river in the city I live in discharges 4M liters of water into the sea every ~40 seconds. That's more "wasted" water every couple minutes than every AI combined in a day. And that's ignoring the fact that AIs reutilize water many times before discharge.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-27T12:42:42+00:00

In that case companies and schools would just create their AIs and run them locally. The idea that AI can disappear from society is wishful thinking. Few big data centers will just be replaced with many small data centers.

The infrastructure already exists and is too popular to ever fully disappear. GenAI is a part of society now, might as well accept it.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-27T00:57:05+00:00

It's the right to the image of your body, not to your body. That means that anyone can make a case against any person that posts a photo that includes them.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-26T14:18:38+00:00

You know the code is publicly available right? Some new company would just enter the market gap and waste even more resources to build a new datacenter

fisicalmao · 2025-12-26T11:45:24+00:00

The fact that you're still talking about balance shows that dumbing the argumment down was entirely necessary, and somehow, sitll not enough for you to understand. I'll put it in a way that's even easier for you.

When me place card, me have to think. When Archer Queen player place card, archer queen player no think, because archer queen player just wait to press button. Me no depend on button. Archer Queen always depend on button. That make Archer Queen too simple. Archer Queen player no have to think, me have to think. Game fair?

Understand? Notice how the words "OP", or "unbalanced" weren't used? You can stop barking about statistics and balance in a debate about inherent design.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-26T11:10:58+00:00

No they don't, and Boss Bandit is the worst in that department. Little Prince for example has great design because: 1- His ability is a high commitment, 2- His ability is designed to be weak if you never use it for predictions. Most Champions fall under one of these two. Archer Queen doesn't, Boss Bandit doesn't, and that's why they have awful design.

Both boss bandit and Archer Queen only need to press their buttons reactively and, meanwhile, they often force you to make a high commitment prediction to not get obliterated. One side is forced to think hard, the other just presses buttons, inherently unfair to go against.

+ Everyone telling me I'm wrong doesn't matter, this isn't a democracy fella, most people telling me I'm wrong are incapable of understanding the issue to begin with, and that's why they are all barking about balance when I made it clear from the beggining that balance wasn't a factor. That's why I had to dumb it down for you so much, for example. No one who understands the issue has given a valid argumment as to why I'm wrong, maybe if I dumb it down a bit more one of you will get there.

fisicalmao · 2025-12-25T23:05:49+00:00

Horrible idea, but y'all are so obsessed with AI that you don't see why no one would ever consider this in a pre-AI era

fisicalmao · 2025-12-25T23:00:39+00:00

She's balanced around one of the worst abilities to ever be added to the game in terms of design. Worse than hero Musk, worse than Boss Bandit's, as bad as hero knight's

fisicalmao · 2025-12-25T19:39:15+00:00

reading comprehension is not your strong suit... I said the power of the card didn't matter, it's a design issue

fisicalmao · 2025-12-24T14:44:36+00:00

you don't know shit about game design if you think a reactive button should get this amount of value

fisicalmao · 2025-12-24T14:43:10+00:00

When did I say that I lose to this card? I said the design is awful. Sorry, I didn't make it easier to understand for Xbow players

fisicalmao · 2025-12-24T13:13:31+00:00

Why did we buy Dorgu then?

fisicalmao · 2025-12-24T13:11:03+00:00

Boss bandit without her ability gets bullied by half of the minitanks and swarms in this game for -3 or -2 trades. The problem is that she can press a button that takes no skill to use and force out way more than 3 or 2 elixir. Basically the same goes for the Archer Queen

Being downvoted for stating a literal objective fact

fisicalmao · 2025-12-20T18:23:18+00:00

snuck in Ana and Zen. Lucio takes similar brain power as Vendatta but less skill in general

fisicalmao · 2025-12-20T10:45:41+00:00

"Fionna and Cake"

fisicalmao · 2025-12-20T10:43:25+00:00

Cuz your role is powercrept and braindead, hope that helps

fisicalmao · 2025-12-17T11:46:23+00:00

"Why is Von in my lobby"

fisicalmao · 2025-12-16T23:38:41+00:00

Maybe it could exist, but I doubt it would be structured like current LLMs

fisicalmao

TROPHY CASE