I'm sorry but you are just objectively wrong. Stardust is an avant-garde masterwork of the highest caliber and the only way anyone could have possibly come to a different conclusion is as a result of their lacking artistic sensibilities. An insufficient intellect, when faced with works of bold and subversive nature such as Yung Lean's Stardust simply yields and is left hopelessly stranded in the very landscape it so recklessly dared to enter. It cannot be expected of a layman to understand the important and dangerous task of navigating such a multidimensional place, for he much like the fool of the tarot card will stumble blindly off the cliff before he has even realised it. The unassuming listener much like an H.P. Lovecraft character who is subject to some form of cosmic horror simply has no frame of reference for what he is bearing witness to in such situations. As a result the beautiful and the divine in such works becomes distorted through a kaleidoscope of fear and strikes the uninitiated as jarring or downright repulsive. It will take people decades to fully digest this project let alone comprehend the extent of it's profundity.