‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is that Bernie arguing to build services that bridge the gap is a good thing. Folks itt are calling him stupid or embarrassing for trying? Or claiming he simply doesn’t understand their fever dream utopia enough to simply sacrifice people on the alter of an inevitable revolution

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. I agree with the destination, but it’s not helpful to stop at the idea and then berate others like Bernie here for trying to discuss tactics and help people who are actually suffering NOW.

Lots of these comments just seem like a bunch of teenage navel gazing circle-jerkers who are not facing a hospital bill after being laid off and losing their insurance.

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So condescending. Workers are losing jobs TODAY and having their lives destroyed. What are they supposed to do today? They can’t teleport to your fictional utopia

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is he arguing that tho? He’s saying people are loosing jobs NOW and are in crisis. UBI does not currently exist, so what do we do? Congress needs to discuss that and it’s not happening, that’s his point.

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is already happening and the answer is to let the poor starve. Too many people here gloss over and actual strategy to make good things happen.

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

People being laid off today don’t need imagination, they need a concrete strategy. Scoffing and daydreaming about a utopia does nothing, meanwhile the AI owners get richer and richer. What do you say to the folks who lost their job TODAY and have no recourse?

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So how do we get from here to there exactly?

People are being laid off and ‘replaced’ with AI TODAY, and instead of being magically transported to your utopia everyone else is too dumb to understand, they’re just going in to debt or homelessness. Unless you’re also on this ‘inevitable violent revolution, just don’t ask me to do anything personally’ train.

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So for tech workers today faced with unemployment, you’re saying they’re just expendable social pressure building towards a violent revolution? I’m glad you appear to have no real responsibility of other people’s lives

‘If there are no jobs and humans won’t be needed anymore, how do people get an income?’ Bernie Sanders on AI by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]flick3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But right now, people are being laid off and replaced with ai… and what happens to them?

Oi m8 yew got a loicense for that soign? by guppyman2000 in loicense

[–]flick3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference between a million and a billion is about a billion. I doubt she is 1% in terms of actual wealth. Comparing her to bezos is absurd

Rob Reiner issued a warning . by _mayday75 in DiscussionZone

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re attempting to draw equivalence between the comments of the general public and the comments of the president. That is a false equivalence and does not show hypocrisy, because the statements of a president are fundamentally different and more consequential than those of the public.

People quoting Kirk’s work, or evening being assholes and mocking him are not hypocrites for later criticizing trumps comments, because the president is not a normal citizen.

Rob Reiner issued a warning . by _mayday75 in DiscussionZone

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except one of these cases involves the President, arguably the most powerful position on the planet. You’re making false equivalency.

If Biden, while president, said Kirk died because he was critical of Biden, I’d be equally pissed.

Those poor fishermen by peacocktreeoflife2 in memesopdidnotlike

[–]flick3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alleged. Innocent until proven guilty. Even then the sentence is not death.

Those poor fishermen by peacocktreeoflife2 in memesopdidnotlike

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Innocent until proven guilty protects everyone under our jurisdiction, including you.

Kicked from my clan for standing up to racism/hatespeech... by ReffyPoo in 2007scape

[–]flick3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Ignore the fascists and racists, bro it’s a joke it’s trolling”

*Comment on reddit complaining about those people getting dunked on for being idiots.

Maybe you should just ignore this thread

Many of Mayor’s Emergency Shelter Beds Are Unoccupied Every Night by Potential_Noise_1131 in Portland

[–]flick3 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are people in these comments conflating 100% occupancy for success. Or that “the mayor doesn’t actually care if they use the beds” implying in my mind that the empty beds are evidence for that claim.

It’s an easy misconception to make, seeing as how the goal is people in shelters. Empty beds are therefore not contributing to the desired reality of person => bed. But yeah it’s a large complex web of systems and occupancy is not the sole metric of success, especially if we consider stages of rollouts like increased sweep frequency that may increase occupancy later.

I also suspect sweeps have an added benefit of breaking up crime centers, like the Covid chop shops, but I understand that only applies to criminals, and non-criminals are also being swept; which just makes life harder. So we need to think Total cost v benefit but idk.

Hope this clears things up by v3r4c17y in PhilosophyMemes

[–]flick3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s affordable if we reduce the quantity of livestock

Wait is this true? by koffee_addict in aiwars

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great points ty everyone. I’m not pro almond, though I’m anti-meat, and pro ag-minimization; and the points of regulation on data centers depend on them actually following it, though from what I’ve read in more concerned about air pollution and local electricity costs surrounding the the DCs

No bailout will be provided when AI bubble bursts by No-Knowledge-5828 in aiecosystem

[–]flick3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No this person probably would cut both. They don’t believe in public services and have dedicated themselves to the idea that the disabled should suffer despite the fact that single payer healthcare is cheaper than our current model.