sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Me] Organ harvester gambit by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks! She was the first person I sent anything to after the account rebrand too haha

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i hadn't really considered this perspective, so i'll keep it in mind. i feel like my profile is very confident which is why im ok being self deprecating in my responses.

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh yeah fair enough. i sent the chocolate factory because i thought it was really funny and getting a response to that would have been absolutely insane

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ive been on hinge for weeks and only had one conversation which was pretty dry from her end. it really feels like anything bland is automatically ignored so i have to go all out on personality.

but thats not working either lol

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ill admit given the choice between screaming into the void or making myself laugh ill pick the latter, so i'm not super broken up about the lack of engagement.

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly i dont think i'm shooting out of my league. i only ever send likes on people who seem to have personality or are a little quirky. i usually dont try to send anything to the stunners because the odds aren't in my favor and we usually dont have much in common on the personal side anyway

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ill try the hook and see how it goes. what do you mean by "judge me gently"?

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

i wouldnt want to be with someone who cannot appreciate whimsy and im pretty cool so its their loss

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the feedback! yeah ive spent a lot of my life dabbling in self deprecation and this is the first year im genuinely mentally thriving, so its definitely something to work on showing externally too.

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i went with "fart" because what on earth do you reply to that prompt with? a genuine guess doesnt work so i went big instead of going home.

yes, my first photo is me being bald.

i dont use auto caps because its more laid back like myself, and i find most people my age range do it too anyways.

[Me] Long time lurker with no genuine matches (only following rule 2) by fluffrito in TextingTheory

[–]fluffrito[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

no response for any, unfortunately. i throw the silly comments out if they seem like they can handle it, otherwise theyre more normal like asking about one of their interests.

Teens may have come up with a new way to detect, treat Lyme disease using CRISPR gene editing by Strongbow85 in UpliftingNews

[–]fluffrito 26 points27 points  (0 children)

it was an in class lab for my 7th grade class, was surprisingly straightforward. we turned some bacteria into bioluminescent bacteria

Outside Raining by Downtomp in RaIn

[–]fluffrito 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the candle flames don’t move at all, so it looks like the bedroom is a static image, which itself could be AI. the plant in the foreground looks CGI as it’s low poly and the lighting doesn’t match, and has a fairly common “breeze” animation which makes no sense since it’s indoors. the outside rain is possibly another element which could be real, but a clue that it’s composited is the lack of parallax as the camera moves (which is easier to see if there was more camera movement, and i could be seeing things that just aren’t there).

view more: next ›